Trump uses his own staff as assassination bait

T. A. Gardner said:
12-66cc87336cc06__700.jpg
Click to expand...

We're not the ones who worship, defend, and vote for a conman and failed TV game show host, Beulah.
 
Did "Trump use his own staff as assassination bait"?



No.

The claim is a sensationalized framing of a real security operation, not evidence that Trump deliberately used staff as “assassination bait.”


In July 2026, after the NATO summit in Ankara, Turkey, U.S. security officials responded to what they described as a credible Iranian assassination threat (linked to the ongoing U.S.-Iran conflict and prior Iranian plots against President Trump stemming from the 2020 Soleimani strike and later events).

President Trump publicly boarded the older Air Force One (the legacy VC-25A), then was secretly moved via an airport catering truck to a smaller Air Force C-32A (a modified Boeing 757).

The older plane continued as a decoy carrying the White House press pool and some staff/aides who were not informed. President Trump and a small group (including close aides like Dan Scavino, Walt Nauta, Natalie Harp, and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth) flew separately to Britain.


Key reported details:


  • The Washington Post first reported the operation (based on materials reviewed, citing "a U.S. official familiar with it, and another person with knowledge"). This has been repeated by the New York Times, Reuters, CBS, WSJ, NPR, and others.
  • Senior officials (e.g., Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Stephen Miller, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, communications director Steven Cheung) remained on the original plane. Reporters were kept in the dark and told to close window shades.
  • President Trump said he followed Secret Service and military recommendations: “I go by Secret Service and the military… They wanted me to go on a different flight… I do what they say.”

Critics (Democrats) have described the decoy plane’s passengers as unwitting “bait” or “collateral damage,” arguing the operation put staff and journalists at risk without their knowledge while prioritizing the president’s safety. Outlets like the Daily Beast and Esquire used strong language along those lines.


This was a deception/protective operation of a type used before (e.g., a Clinton-era precedent with an unmarked jet and decoy Air Force One).

Presidents are the primary protectee; contingency plans routinely prioritize extracting the president.

No missiles were fired, and the threat assessment came amid heightened Iranian hostility.

There is no evidence of a deliberate plan to sacrifice staff as bait rather than a rapid security response to intelligence about a specific threat to Air Force One.


In short: A real, classified protective switch occurred due to a reported Iranian threat, leaving some staff and the press on the decoy plane.

Calling it “using his own staff as assassination bait” is a charged characterization of standard (if dramatic) presidential security practices, not a verified intent or established fact.
 
Cypress said:

With Trump Secretly Evacuated, Imperiled Air Force One Became a Flying Decoy​

In response to a threat against the jet last month, the president was clandestinely removed in a catering container. But the plane was sent into the skies anyway with government employees and reporters onboard.

The government has on rare occasions engaged in sleight of hand to safeguard presidents from possible jeopardy, particularly for journeys to hazardous locations. The Trump team’s ruse in Ankara, however, stands out not only for its misdirection but also for the way it shifted the evident peril to others.


www.nytimes.com

With Trump Secretly Evacuated, Imperiled Air Force One Became a Flying Decoy

In response to a threat against the jet last month, the president was clandestinely removed in a catering container. But the plane was sent into the skies anyway with government employees and reporters onboard.
www.nytimes.com www.nytimes.com
Click to expand...
So?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top