Former Secretary of Labor Robert Reich explains what the Constitution's Emoluments Clause is and how Trump is entangled in it.
But in the end, nothing is ever going to come of it, bottom line, to prove such you have to have financial records, and Trump knows full well that any request for financial data is going to be tied up in the Courts for years, and even as we are seeing now with the lawsuits he is losing, they are eventually going to go to the SCOTUS, and he didn't put Brett there cause he thought he would make a good Justice
Sad, but that is the reality, and in the meantime Trump is doing his best to make sure he profits as much as he can off of being President
nothing will come of this because to do so will require saying our first president is guilty of the same violation. the courts will eventually rule that nobody today has a better understanding of the constitution so to claim the same exact activity is all of a sudden a violation would be laughable
Your not going to try to tell us that because George was a farmer at the same time he was President that makes him guilty of using the office of the President to make money are you?
Former Secretary of Labor Robert Reich explains what the Constitution's Emoluments Clause is and how Trump is entangled in it.
Former Secretary of Labor Robert Reich explains what the Constitution's Emoluments Clause is and how Trump is entangled in it.
Trump has the SAME BUSINESSES GE GAD BEFORE TAKING OFFICE...TO WHICH HE IS ENTITLED.
Trump is whore who is always for sale. But what makes him really disgusting is that he is a thieving lying whore.
Then why is he LOSING MONEY AS POTUS, UNLIKE THE OBAMAS and CLINTONS, WHO BECAME MILLIONAIRES IN THE WHITE HOUSE?
Then why is he LOSING MONEY AS POTUS, UNLIKE THE OBAMAS and CLINTONS, WHO BECAME MILLIONAIRES IN THE WHITE HOUSE?
nothing will come of this because to do so will require saying our first president is guilty of the same violation. the courts will eventually rule that nobody today has a better understanding of the constitution so to claim the same exact activity is all of a sudden a violation would be laughable
Your not going to try to tell us that because George was a farmer at the same time he was President that makes him guilty of using the office of the President to make money are you?
Did they donate their salaries ?
Did they donate their salaries ?
Lame!