Trump's Spiritual Adviser: Sure, Jesus Was A Refugee, But He Didn't Do Anything Illeg

You were the one who chose scripture to make a point, don’t want to discuss it, don’t use it.

Oh my goodness......here we go. The thread was started on a religious note. I used a Scripture to make point, yes. That was all. It only means something to those who believe the Scriptures. To those who may not have the same "belief" as I do, it means nothing...it only makes it a jumping off point for fleshly arguments, not a spiritual discussion. As I've stated many times, the Bible is not a book of fleshly intellect. It is the Word of God and as the Bible states, "It is spiritually discerned."
Christians are admonished to not get into arguments and fights of the flesh over spiritual matters. It only "leads to strife and confusion." I'm merely trying to prevent a fight over something that God himself tells believers not to fight about in the first place with those who do not believe. Got it?
Peace :cool:
 
He came for the express purpose of doing the Father's will. The Lamb of God who takes away the sins of the world. He prayed that powerful prayer the night before He was to go to the cross. He cried out, "IF you are willing...". He wasn't looking for loopholes. This was to emphasize total fleshly AND spiritual submission to the will of the Father. He came first as the Lamb, He will return as the Lion.

It's the extreme act of humility. No matter what we pray for, it mustn't be more important than the will of God for us. I may pray for many people and situations, yet always acknowledging that it's God's will that I most want to see accomplished.

where do you crazy goyim come up with this crap about a man god?


 
Not really, it seems he didn’t really want to lay down his life willingly, that it was his Father’s will not his.

Sounds to me as though the god of the Bible is saying:

"Okay, I can easily forgive your 'sins' (the things you've done to offend me)...but I won't do it unless you first torture and kill my son."

That seems reasonable to...anyone?

Seriously?
 
Oh my goodness......here we go. The thread was started on a religious note. I used a Scripture to make point, yes. That was all. It only means something to those who believe the Scriptures. To those who may not have the same "belief" as I do, it means nothing...it only makes it a jumping off point for fleshly arguments, not a spiritual discussion. As I've stated many times, the Bible is not a book of fleshly intellect. It is the Word of God and as the Bible states, "It is spiritually discerned."
Christians are admonished to not get into arguments and fights of the flesh over spiritual matters. It only "leads to strife and confusion." I'm merely trying to prevent a fight over something that God himself tells believers not to fight about in the first place with those who do not believe. Got it?
Peace :cool:

In a way you are correct, Stretch.

Those people who blindly guess that stuff is true...should go with it.

Those not blindly guessing that stuff is true...get a pass on it.

But if you post the stuff you blindly guess to be true here in the forum...people ARE going to comment on it.
 
Whatever. We're headed for a discussion on false teachers and false doctrine now. So I won't continue because it will only stir up strife and no amount of Scriptures will suffice. As you've already said, "Your belief, not mine,...".
:cool:

“The Bible is the word of God"
"How can you be sure it's the word of God?"
"Because the Bible tells us so"
"Why believe the Bible?
"The Bible is infallible"
"How do you know it's infallible?"...

(Return to top)
 
Sounds to me as though the god of the Bible is saying:

"Okay, I can easily forgive your 'sins' (the things you've done to offend me)...but I won't do it unless you first torture and kill my son."

That seems reasonable to...anyone?

Seriously?
I find it confusing. A omnipotent god chooses this method to redeem people, it makes no sense, there are so many alternatives.
 
Oh my goodness......here we go. The thread was started on a religious note. I used a Scripture to make point, yes. That was all. It only means something to those who believe the Scriptures. To those who may not have the same "belief" as I do, it means nothing...it only makes it a jumping off point for fleshly arguments, not a spiritual discussion. As I've stated many times, the Bible is not a book of fleshly intellect. It is the Word of God and as the Bible states, "It is spiritually discerned."
Christians are admonished to not get into arguments and fights of the flesh over spiritual matters. It only "leads to strife and confusion." I'm merely trying to prevent a fight over something that God himself tells believers not to fight about in the first place with those who do not believe. Got it?
Peace :cool:
Yes, so, again, don’t use scripture if you don’t want it challenged and don’t want to discuss it.

Got it?
 
Paula White: Con Artist


Paula White, Donald Trump’s “spiritual adviser,” is, like him, a prosperity gospel con artist. Her version is religious, his is secular, but they operate the same way, by fleecing credulous, desperate people of their money in a highly efficient manner. Listen to her version of the scam:

the dumb southern goyim love to get conned



http://www.patheos.com/blogs/dispatches/2016/07/12/paula-white-con-artist/
 
In a way you are correct, Stretch.

Those people who blindly guess that stuff is true...should go with it.

Those not blindly guessing that stuff is true...get a pass on it.

But if you post the stuff you blindly guess to be true here in the forum...people ARE going to comment on it.

I never anywhere said other people can not discuss it. That would be stupid...this is a forum meant for discussion.
I merely was stating why I would not continue the discussion with Phantasmal whom I have absolutely no dislike for at all...he (or she) makes terrific thoughtful posts here all the time. I'm only responsible for my own behavior and use wisdom as to just how long a Biblical discussion should continue with another person.
So go for it. Rip Christ apart, curse God and his Word, trash me, let all the usual venom flow and verbal religious wars continue.
As the wise King Solomon said, "There's nothing new under the sun."
 
I find it confusing. A omnipotent god chooses this method to redeem people, it makes no sense, there are so many alternatives.

We are to come to God by faith, not fleshly reasoning. That's why he said that "wise men will stumble over it." (his plan of redemption by loving us and dying for us while we were yet in our sin). :)
 
We are to come to God by faith, not fleshly reasoning. That's why he said that "wise men will stumble over it." (his plan of redemption by loving us and dying for us while we were yet in our sin). :)

It works for you, I find it to be the reasoning of an ancient people who thought killing and burning animals was a way to get right with their god.
 
Yes, so, again, don’t use scripture if you don’t want it challenged and don’t want to discuss it.

Got it?

LOL!
A religious thread is started........but don't use Scripture. :laugh:

And, you stillllllllllllll miss the point. :palm:
If a discussion of Scripture is by like minds of 2 believers, that's fine. If one of the 2 does not believe AND has no interest in accepting God's Word as an agreed upon foundational basis of truth for a discussion, then it's best to let it go rather than to have a fight. ;)
 
Strange how Jews know more about the goyim's religion then the goyim knows about Judaism , and no, not what they are taught by their goyim leaders
 
Back
Top