The burden of proof does not rest upon me, as you'd know if you understood basic concepts of discussion.
Who's "us", BTW?
I see. So if I quote someone. even if I fail to attribute the words to them, and present them as having some validity then you think I don't have to defend anything they said? That is the standard you are setting here?
Interesting that you think I am the only one that reads your posts. But then I suppose that could be true.