Under pressure FBI Director Kash Patel claims agency has ‘evidence’ that 2020 election was stolen from Trump: ‘Stay tuned this week'

So we go from the claim that the postmark never matters, to in the extremely rare possibility that the USPS smudged the postmark, the valid voter is not punished? What control over the postmark does the voter even have?

What is the purpose for this "cheating"? Why would Democratic voters mail in their ballots late, on the 0.01% chance the postmark would be smudged? They lose 99.99% of their votes for what reason?


The whole point of owning a 2019 Yaris is I do not have to wax it. I get the inside detailed, and they offer to detail the outside for a steep discount, but I am not interested. Who am I showing off for?

A week or two ago, a branch fell on my car. It put a nasty little dent in the roof. I did not care, because the car's operation was not effected.

I have a huge amount in my Roth. I have no problem paying for my kids college. I have a large amount saved for a rainy day. I have some very interesting investments that every now and then pay off big. Those are the important things. Owning a car to impress people I do not know has no importance to me.
Moving goalposts is a RWNJ speciality.
 
I think she is using gaslighting to dismiss a rational concern. You will also see, "no evidence of 'widespread' cheating" constantly repeated as a reason to dismiss the concerns and the requests for better reassurance, such as simple voter ID.

When you reject what 78% of voters think is reasonable, you need strong gaslighting programs.
It’s lies Damo

Fix your head on straight
 
cute. But they are saying that they overcame the cheating in the years he won, and were not able to overcome the cheating in the year that they had "emergency mail in ballots" everywhere.
Mail in ballots are not a problem

It’s fucking lies Damo
 
I think she is using gaslighting to dismiss a rational concern. You will also see, "no evidence of 'widespread' cheating" constantly repeated as a reason to dismiss the concerns and the requests for better reassurance, such as simple voter ID.

When you reject what 78% of voters think is reasonable, you need strong gaslighting programs.
Your team lies to voters about what’s in the bill

Why do you just keep backing liars
 
Patel isn't saying "stolen".
Patel acknowledges that the 2020 election was stolen; you can go with that.

Would you like to continue with your affidavit-denying gymnastics and general denial of eye-witness testimony?
 
Mail in ballots are not a problem
Mail-in ballots are a huge problem; they induce massive cheating.

Democrats cannot win without cheating. Point to a Democrat win and I'll point to massive Democrat cheating in which you will only be able to quibble that the massive cheating perhaps doesn't qualify as "massive".
 
Patel acknowledges that the 2020 election was stolen; you can go with that.
Sure, a lot of people say the 2020 election was stolen. I'm still waiting for evidence to show it.
Would you like to continue with your affidavit-denying gymnastics and general denial of eye-witness testimony?
There's no gymnastics. Lots of people think they say things, including that crazy chick that was with Giuliani in Michigan. People thinking they see something doesn't mean they actually saw what they think they saw.

I mean, the president claimed his lawyers had the proof 6 years ago when he called Georgia. Where is it?
 
When we discuss politics nowadays, the start is that Trump and his people tell lies casually and often.There is no possible debate like adults. It gets very stale.
 
I'm not ignoring the evidence.
Yes, you are ignoring all of it, while deluding yourself into believing that there simply isn't any there. We've been over this many, many times. Eyewitness testimony is the highest form of evidence, and the mountainous eyewitness testimony is incontrovertible. All you have in response is "Nuh-uh" and to deny the overwhelming, incontrovertible evidence before you.

I am pretty sure I've seen all the evidence,
You had to work overtime to convince yourself that all of your ignoring of the evidence was really just a complete lack of evidence.

which is why I don't believe it's stolen..
... and voila! The self-delusion is complete.
 
When we discuss politics nowadays, the start is that Trump and his people tell lies casually and often.There is no possible debate like adults. It gets very stale.
When we discuss politics, conservatives tell the truth, and leftists only lie, e.g. "Trump and his people tell lies casually"
 
Yes, you are ignoring all of it, while deluding yourself into believing that there simply isn't any there. We've been over this many, many times. Eyewitness testimony is the highest form of evidence, and the mountainous eyewitness testimony is incontrovertible. All you have in response is "Nuh-uh" and to deny the overwhelming, incontrovertible evidence before you.


You had to work overtime to convince yourself that all of your ignoring of the evidence was really just a complete lack of evidence.


... and voila! The self-delusion is complete.
You deleted what I said about the "eye witness" evidence. That wasn't an accident.

And the people you say are eye witnesses actually aren't eye witnesses. Eye witnesses see and event, like a car accident, and try to remember details of the event. In the ass of your "evidence", the people witnesses something that they interpreted to be x, but is very likely to not be X.
 
Back
Top