Under pressure FBI Director Kash Patel claims agency has ‘evidence’ that 2020 election was stolen from Trump: ‘Stay tuned this week'

Agreed.

But Damo is the worst of the children as i often think, like with this topic, he is not just being dishonest, like many magats, and is duped like a child.

For instance I actually think Damo is gullible enough to believe that if Dems agreed to all changes but kept winning that the magats would say 'ok we trust this result' and not what we see in the video I posted above where magats demands 'stop count' when Trump is ahead but 'count every vote' when he is behind.

You have to be a child to not realize it and instead put the onus on Dems to keep capitulating until magats have 'confidence '.
LOL He's under a lot of stress and constant stress can have an adverse effect upon one's psyche.

Key Takeaways​

  • Chronic stress can make you feel tired and anxious.
  • Stress from work and relationships can affect your health if not managed.
  • Common signs of chronic stress include aches and pains, headaches, and trouble sleeping.
1777054885103.png
 
cute. But they are saying that they overcame the cheating in the years he won, and we're not able to overcome the cheating in the year that they had "emergency mail in ballots" everywhere.
Of course. There's always an excuse/explanation. That's how a good conspiracy theorist keeps rationalizing their conspiracy theory.
 
Of course. There's always an excuse/explanation. That's how a good conspiracy theorist keeps rationalizing their conspiracy theory.
Or dismissing a rational concern. If you want to dismiss a rational concern you just make up "questions" like the one that I responded to... folks who like the way it is glom on and think they are sage. It's called gaslighting, one side of the political aisle is better at it than the other.
 
Or dismissing a rational concern. If you want to dismiss a rational concern you just make up "questions" like the one that I responded to... folks who like the way it is glom on and think they are sage. It's called gaslighting, one side of the political aisle is better at it than the other.
I don't think she was saying anyone overcame cheating. I think her point is that there is no cheating by calling out that Trump won when other presidents were overseeing election security at a national level.
 
I don't think she was saying anyone overcame cheating. I think her point is that there is no cheating by calling out that Trump won when other presidents were overseeing election security at a national level.
I think she is using gaslighting to dismiss a rational concern. You will also see, "no evidence of 'widespread' cheating" constantly repeated as a reason to dismiss the concerns and the requests for better reassurance, such as simple voter ID.

When you reject what 78% of voters think is reasonable, you need strong gaslighting programs.
 
I think she is using gaslighting to dismiss a rational concern. You will also see, "no evidence of 'widespread' cheating" constantly repeated as a reason to dismiss the concerns and the requests for better reassurance, such as simple voter ID.

When you reject what 78% of voters think is reasonable, you need strong gaslighting programs.
layers of weasel words.
 
I think she is using gaslighting to dismiss a rational concern. You will also see, "no evidence of 'widespread' cheating" constantly repeated as a reason to dismiss the concerns and the requests for better reassurance, such as simple voter ID.

When you reject what 78% of voters think is reasonable, you need strong gaslighting programs.
You act as if bringing to facts to bear ("no evidence of widespread cheating") is wrong and gaslighting when the gaslighting is pushing an idea that despite that FACT, there still is fraud that needs to be dealt with and that the measures like Trumps voter suppression bill, thinly disguised as just 'new id requirements'.

The entire narrative, just like the Jan6 one, is gaslighting pushed by the right with no such comparable thing on the left.

And yet here you are pushing a lie.
 
The 2020 election faulted due to election fraud.

If anyone truly believes that Joe Biden legitimately received 81.28 million votes in 2020, then I have some oceanfront property in Arizona to sell you.
Present the evidence that convinced you
 
No. I think the strenuous objection to any change that would produce such confidence produces far more erosion. When 80% of the voters think something would be good, but one party strenuously fights against it to protect the status quo it hurts far more than Patel saying this...
What is that blather

Present your evidence
 
Back
Top