Decent people don’t crush the head of a baby, then sell the body parts as PP did/does, Annerica hating Iolo sock.
You appear to assign death to a child who will grow up to be poor.
A “poverty” test for the unborn.
How quaint.
'Unfathomable': Franklin Graham slams Christianity Today for demanding Trump removal
- Thread starter Grokmaster
- Start date
Decent people don’t crush the head of a baby, then sell the body parts as PP did/does, Annerica hating Iolo sock.
You appear to assign death to a child who will grow up to be poor.
A “poverty” test for the unborn.
How quaint.
Darth Omar
Russian asset
Ok, let’s take your ‘optimistic’ view of things to its logical conclusion.
At what point does it become ‘reasonable’ to just off these individuals that are doomed to a miserable life? Wouldn’t we be doing them a favor if we just gassed them? Moreover, since they are doomed to be an economic burden on society it makes even better sense.
Wait a minute. This is starting to sound a little too familiar, isn’t it. Deliver me, from your abortion ‘logic’.
It makes no sense to argue with people who claim to be channeling God's verdict on an issue.
I could as readily write a bible I say was hewn into stone on Mount Nebo and in it the real God commanded
us to not be fruitful and not multiply and to have abortions of each 3rd female until the age of 13.
It would likely take eons for the devout of my religion to determine this is not a very rational plan, provided
I extracted enough wealth to run an intergenerational propaganda campaign with all the pomp and circumstance
of the Vatican.
There are humans, they have behaviors, and competing interests in a material natural world filled with joy, and disease
and trappings and families. There is no sky daddy saying how conflicts should be resolved. All the religious rights
arguments come down to edict from a sky daddy, so stop pretending your arguments are based in science or reason.
I know, scientifically speaking, a fertilized egg has no psychological attachment to its own existence as it
can't think, see, detect itself etc. It hasn't even grown a fucking head.
I could as readily write a bible I say was hewn into stone on Mount Nebo and in it the real God commanded
us to not be fruitful and not multiply and to have abortions of each 3rd female until the age of 13.
It would likely take eons for the devout of my religion to determine this is not a very rational plan, provided
I extracted enough wealth to run an intergenerational propaganda campaign with all the pomp and circumstance
of the Vatican.
There are humans, they have behaviors, and competing interests in a material natural world filled with joy, and disease
and trappings and families. There is no sky daddy saying how conflicts should be resolved. All the religious rights
arguments come down to edict from a sky daddy, so stop pretending your arguments are based in science or reason.
I know, scientifically speaking, a fertilized egg has no psychological attachment to its own existence as it
can't think, see, detect itself etc. It hasn't even grown a fucking head.
Iolo/Penderyn
Verified User
The only answer, as you know, is to get shot of you exploiting buggers and establish a system based on human need. The only 'burden on society' is you vermin gobbling up the surplus, as you also know. In a decent society,obviously, there would be very little call for abortion.
Darth Omar
Russian asset
Why do you keep injecting religion into a science debate?
saltydancin
Verified User
Nazi Germany soldiers with Jewish babies from Mengele's Angel of Death baptize thine eyes defamations of the parents of Jewish children for that Catholic Church Kristallnacht Christiananality pedophilia business abortions factory in another Christ existed before God fetus rite....
Ideally not having an unwanted pregnancy is best, barring that having abortion as early as possible up until the end
of the first trimester is the next best, but concededly arbitrary, reason based solution to an insoluble issue.
Penderyn's point about the life a child and mom will lead is well taken, but I'd amplify it by saying as long as we are deciding, shouldn't we be humble
enough to concede the woman should have a bigger say in the matter? And her personal doctor? Then the husband considered by her secondarily?
In the decision making tree how far down must be the state when invading vaginas to save fertilized eggs which could become their babies is concerned?
of the first trimester is the next best, but concededly arbitrary, reason based solution to an insoluble issue.
Penderyn's point about the life a child and mom will lead is well taken, but I'd amplify it by saying as long as we are deciding, shouldn't we be humble
enough to concede the woman should have a bigger say in the matter? And her personal doctor? Then the husband considered by her secondarily?
In the decision making tree how far down must be the state when invading vaginas to save fertilized eggs which could become their babies is concerned?
SORRY DUMBFUCK, but ANY BIOLOGIST ON THE PLANET CONCEDES THAT ONCE CELLS ARE BEING REPRODUCED, LIFE EXISTS.
NO USE ARGUING WITH IDIOTS WHO LIE FOR A LIVING....AND IGNORE SCIENCE....
saltydancin
Verified User
Leave that judgement to SCOTUS Rehnquist's Christ existed before God immaculate drug conception to confirm Federal Lynching KKK churchstate of hate fabricated misnomer immaculate conception that a Washington, D.C. born retired WW II Pentagon staff sergeant to Ike was Islam as Christiananality's pedophilia law of the land as Mengele Angel of Death defamations in Islamophobia Islamidiotocracy.
I always liked his father...
Perhaps a paternity test is needed to see if perhaps jerry farwell isn't his real dad.......... or one of the crocked jimmy's???
You are a classic example, providing one. trumps can do no wrong.
As trump said, he bought your loyalty so stay in line bitches.........
Trump’s evangelical supporters have pointed to his Supreme Court nominees, his defense of religious liberty, and his stewardship of the economy, among other things, as achievements that justify their support of the president. We believe the impeachment hearings have made it absolutely clear, in a way the Mueller investigation did not, that President Trump has abused his authority for personal gain and betrayed his constitutional oath. The impeachment hearings have illuminated the president’s moral deficiencies for all to see. This damages the institution of the presidency, damages the reputation of our country, and damages both the spirit and the future of our people. None of the president’s positives can balance the moral and political danger we face under a leader of such grossly immoral character.
AMEN
Christianity Today's SOON-TO-BE-GONE-EDITOR DOES NOT SPPEAK FOR ANYTHING REMOTELY CLOSE TO A SIGNIFICANT AMOUNT OF CHRISTENDOM....
To bad for you that now the Christian "left" is on the rise... You are like your fathers the Pharisee, using the law to force others & put yokes on them you yourself are unwilling & unable to carry...........
Better get use to it.......
