When you start asking "why?", their defense falls apart

[LV426]

Conservatives on these boards are using every rhetorical trick they can to avoid answering for what is spelled out in the Mueller report.

They are arguing the validity of the report itself, the credibility of Mueller, everything except the contents of the actual report.

When you start asking the "why" questions...i.e. why did Manafort share polling data with Russian spies? Why did Trump's counsel try to tamper with Flynn? Why did Trump order his son to lie about the June 2016 Trumnp Tower meeting with Russians? Why, why, why...that's when the Conservatives cease defending Trump and start attacking you. Attacking you for asking WHY these people did what they did.

Conservatives have no answer for the "why" because the "why" explains everything.

So that's why none of them want to read the Mueller Report...it answers the "why" and doesn't allow them to falsely equivocate.

 

[Teflon Don]

Why did Mueller not indict ANYONE for conspiracy or obstruction?

WHY

WHY

WHY

WHY

WHY

WHY

WHY

WHY

WHY

WHY

WHY

WHY

WHY

WHY

WHY

WHY

WHY

WHY

WHY

WHY

WHY

WHY

WHY

WHY

WHY

WHY

WHY

WHY

WHY

WHY

WHY

WHY

WHY

WHY

WHY

 

[LV426]

Why did Mueller not indict ANYONE for conspiracy or obstruction?

Because as Mueller said himself, OLC & DOJ guidelines prevented him from indicting the President.

It's been posted dozens of times, yet you still don't know that.

Why?

 

[Getin the ring]

Why at e the forum nut**bags still talking about a closed case

why
why
why
why

Look LVnutbags426,

if you want to be the head clown we have no problem with that, can we call you clucko the clown though, please?

 

[Tranquillus in Exile]

Why did Mueller not indict ANYONE for conspiracy or obstruction?

WHY

Why didn't the government indict anyone in the Capone mob for racketeering or murder?

I guess they mustn't have been racketeers or killers, eh?

 

[Ichabod Stain]

mueller said he found no prosecutable crimes, and recommended no prosecutions.

 

[Getin the ring]

mueller said he found no prosecutable crimes, and recommended no prosecutions.

yea I know, right?

Isnt really that hard to follow is it

 

[LV426]

Why at e the forum nut**bags still talking about a closed case

How is it closed when you can't answer the questions as to why these people did what they did?

 

[LV426]

mueller said he found no prosecutable crimes, and recommended no prosecutions

That is not what Mueller said at all.

Post the part of his report that says that. I'll wait.

 

[Getin the ring]

look I personally hope the Democrats keep investigating, essentially making fools of themselves right on up to the 2020 election.
I really do, and I think they will I see no evidence they have learned anything from the past.

I think you know it's a losing cause, that has no possible outcome even resembling anything positive for the left.

It's a hail Mary, and I understand, we all understand what hail Mary's mean right? you're losing, you're behind and you have nothing to lose

good luck

 

[Ichabod Stain]

How is it closed when you can't answer the questions as to why these people did what they did?

mueller closed it. he's done. he's out. nut up and impeach or not. that's basically his recent parting message.

 

[LV426]

look I personally hope the Democrats keep investigating, essentially making fools of themselves right on up to the 2020 election.

The only fools here are the ones defending Trump, but refusing to explain why he and his people did what Mueller outlines in his report.

You're going to carry that baggage with you forever.

Not sure if you truly realize the implication of what you're doing.

 

[LV426]

I really do, and I think they will I see no evidence they have learned anything from the past.

You defend Trump from a report you haven't read, and can't explain the details of.

So your post seems like projection.

 

[Truth Detector]

When you start asking "why?", their defense falls apart
Conservatives on these boards are using every rhetorical trick they can to avoid answering for what is spelled out in the Mueller report.

LIE and LAME. You just described yourself. You're the willful idiot who is claiming that Russia gt Trump elected. Nothing could be further from the truth or much more retarded that that.

The only thing you prove every day is what a shrill, lying, low IQ, leftist asshole you are.

Page 173 V I: Ultimately, the investigation did not establish that the Campaign coordinated or conspired with the Russian government in its election-interference activities.

Barr: Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein and I have concluded that the evidence developed during the Special Counsel's investigation is not sufficient to establish that the President committed an obstruction-of-justice offense.

 

[Truth Detector]

Because as Mueller said himself, OLC & DOJ guidelines prevented him from indicting the President.

It's been posted dozens of times, yet you still don't know that.

Why?

Page 173 V I: Ultimately, the investigation did not establish that the Campaign coordinated or conspired with the Russian government in its election-interference activities.

Barr: Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein and I have concluded that the evidence developed during the Special Counsel's investigation is not sufficient to establish that the President committed an obstruction-of-justice offense.

 

[Truth Detector]

Why didn't the government indict anyone in the Capone mob for racketeering or murder?

I guess they mustn't have been racketeers or killers, eh?

WRONG; they could not find evidence or proof. What crimes has Trump been indicted or charged with?

 

[Truth Detector]

How is it closed when you can't answer the questions as to why these people did what they did?

Because of this dumbass:

Page 173 V I: Ultimately, the investigation did not establish that the Campaign coordinated or conspired with the Russian government in its election-interference activities.

Barr: Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein and I have concluded that the evidence developed during the Special Counsel's investigation is not sufficient to establish that the President committed an obstruction-of-justice offense.

 

[Truth Detector]

That is not what Mueller said at all.

Post the part of his report that says that. I'll wait.

Page 173 V I: Ultimately, the investigation did not establish that the Campaign coordinated or conspired with the Russian government in its election-interference activities.

Barr: Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein and I have concluded that the evidence developed during the Special Counsel's investigation is not sufficient to establish that the President committed an obstruction-of-justice offense.

 

[Truth Detector]

The only fools here are the ones defending Trump, but refusing to explain why he and his people did what Mueller outlines in his report.

You're going to carry that baggage with you forever.

Not sure if you truly realize the implication of what you're doing.

Amusing that you lack the awareness to comprehend that it is you who is the moron.

Page 173 V I: Ultimately, the investigation did not establish that the Campaign coordinated or conspired with the Russian government in its election-interference activities.

Barr: Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein and I have concluded that the evidence developed during the Special Counsel's investigation is not sufficient to establish that the President committed an obstruction-of-justice offense.

 

[Truth Detector]

You defend Trump from a report you haven't read, and can't explain the details of.

So your post seems like projection.

It's not about defending Trump you shrill willful idiot. It is about defending the truth. Something that is lacking in ALL of your whiny lie filled posts.