Why does it have to be the FBI?

Please tell me about the insensitive and mysogynistic behavior you are seeing right now. Because, I have to be honest with you I haven't seen any of it. Now if your standard is that by even questioning her is sexist then yeah. But, I haven't seen any politician say anything negative about her. On the contrary she has been treated with kid gloves.

Don't think for a minute that part of the calculation as Ford plotted with her lawyer and democrats was that as soon as this came out Trump would go on a twitter rampage and they would be able to focus on his tweets and try to pressure the Flake types. But Trump has been the man.

You can't just make these statements without backing them up. Well, you can. I can't stop you. But you can't expect me to take you seriously

Full Frontal did a whole thing on it last night - it was funny/tragic, and you can probably find it on youtube. Just a lot of "hey, who hasn't assaulted someone at 17/boys will be boys" kind of stuff.
 
Full Frontal did a whole thing on it last night - it was funny/tragic, and you can probably find it on youtube. Just a lot of "hey, who hasn't assaulted someone at 17/boys will be boys" kind of stuff.

Seriously?

Full Frontal? that is what you get your fucking news from?

No wonder you are so misinformed.

Provide the link
 
Seriously?

Full Frontal? that is what you get your fucking news from?

No wonder you are so misinformed.

Provide the link

You can do your own homework. And all she did was show clips of people talking. We've had posts like that on this board, too.

It's amazing how insensitive that stuff sounds.
 
Please tell me about the insensitive and mysogynistic behavior you are seeing right now. Because, I have to be honest with you I haven't seen any of it. Now if your standard is that by even questioning her is sexist then yeah. But, I haven't seen any politician say anything negative about her. On the contrary she has been treated with kid gloves.

Don't think for a minute that part of the calculation as Ford plotted with her lawyer and democrats was that as soon as this came out Trump would go on a twitter rampage and they would be able to focus on his tweets and try to pressure the Flake types. But Trump has been the man.

You can't just make these statements without backing them up. Well, you can. I can't stop you. But you can't expect me to take you seriously

Also, just to be clear - it wasn't politicians or pundits attacking the alleged victim. It was excusing the behavior in general, IF it's true.
 
Also, just to be clear - it wasn't politicians or pundits attacking the alleged victim. It was excusing the behavior in general, IF it's true.

So you are backtracking on your claim?

What's the point? I'm not going go convince you of how insensitive and misogynistic Fox, talk radio & many on the right are coming across as right now. It's worse than it was w/ Hill.

I think it's a base-motivator, personally. But Grind gets upset when I make predictions, so...

You specifically called out Fox and Talk Radio. But no corroboration. Should we launch an FBI investigation before you confirm what you claimed?
 
So you are backtracking on your claim?



You specifically called out Fox and Talk Radio. But no corroboration. Should we launch an FBI investigation before you confirm what you claimed?

How is it backtracking?

WHERE did I say that they were attacking the victim? Please provide the verbiage.
 
So you are backtracking on your claim?



You specifically called out Fox and Talk Radio. But no corroboration. Should we launch an FBI investigation before you confirm what you claimed?

dear fucking idiot

Fox is already being investigated by the FBI for working with the Russians


they just kept repeating the Russian fake news stories


fuck you very much
 
How is it backtracking?

WHERE did I say that they were attacking the victim? Please provide the verbiage.


Are you fucking on drugs or something?


Here is your post

What's the point? I'm not going go convince you of how insensitive and misogynistic Fox, talk radio & many on the right are coming across as right now. It's worse than it was w/ Hill.

I think it's a base-motivator, personally. But Grind gets upset when I make predictions, so...

I specifically asked you for an example of Fox and or talk radio being "insensitive and misogynistic" and all you could come with was you watched something on Full Frontal but refused to provide a link. Maybe you need the FBI to fully investigate first?

:dunno:
 
Well, why does it have to be the FBI?

Simple:

Lying to local law enforcement is not a felony. In fact, the penalties for lying to local PD vary depending on the jurisdiction, are at the local prosecutor's discretion, and could be just a fine.

However, lying to the FBI is a felony. So it's pretty obvious why Conservatives don't want their people talking to the FBI; because Conservatives simply can't help themselves from lying to federal agents. They all saw what happened to Flynn, Manafort, Gates, and Papadopolous when they lied to the FBI, and they don't want that to happen again.

So there's a lot of bad faith posturing going on, like your bad faith question here.

You obviously know that there's no federal statute when it comes to lying to local law enforcement; a cursory Google search would reveal that.

So that begs the obvious question; why are you acting in bad faith?

The answer is because you simply don't know how to act any other way.
 
Are you fucking on drugs or something?


Here is your post



I specifically asked you for an example of Fox and or talk radio being "insensitive and misogynistic" and all you could come with was you watched something on Full Frontal but refused to provide a link. Maybe you need the FBI to fully investigate first?

:dunno:

You said I was backtracking. I never said they were attacking the alleged victim - what they've been doing is more of the "boys will be boys" stuff, and excusing the idea of alleged assault because it was so long ago.

I never do your homework requests. It's not backtracking.
 
You said I was backtracking. I never said they were attacking the alleged victim - what they've been doing is more of the "boys will be boys" stuff, and excusing the idea of alleged assault because it was so long ago.

I never do your homework requests. It's not backtracking.

typical bullshit by you

You throw out some unsubstantiated claim. When you are asked to back it up, you whine and move the goal posts. Why are you defending yourself against accusations I never made?

I asked you to provide proof of Fox and Talk Radio doing the things you claim they did. You simply said "I saw it on Full Frontal"

Maybe you should call for a full FBI investigation before you provide proof of what you say :)
 
typical bullshit by you

You throw out some unsubstantiated claim. When you are asked to back it up, you whine and move the goal posts. Why are you defending yourself against accusations I never made?

I asked you to provide proof of Fox and Talk Radio doing the things you claim they did. You simply said "I saw it on Full Frontal"

Maybe you should call for a full FBI investigation before you provide proof of what you say :)

shut the fuck up Fox addict

you have zero credibility
 
typical bullshit by you

You throw out some unsubstantiated claim. When you are asked to back it up, you whine and move the goal posts. Why are you defending yourself against accusations I never made?

I asked you to provide proof of Fox and Talk Radio doing the things you claim they did. You simply said "I saw it on Full Frontal"

Maybe you should call for a full FBI investigation before you provide proof of what you say :)

I didn't move the goalposts. You said I was backtracking; I'm not. I just don't do homework for you.

Because I don't care. I'm not lying. I've seen it since this started - on this board, there was a poster who said 99% of dudes would be in trouble if they were held accountable for what they did at 17. I think that's in incredibly untrue & insensitive remark to make. It's really along the lines of, "hey, who hasn't done this kind of thing."

But like I said, I don't care. We were talking about what potential voters are seeing. I think those who want equal treatment for women are seeing a much different dialogue nationally right now than those who are simply trying to defend the nominee at all costs, and I think if there is any backlash that comes out of this, it will be toward the right of the spectrum.
 
I didn't move the goalposts. You said I was backtracking; I'm not. I just don't do homework for you.

Because I don't care. I'm not lying. I've seen it since this started - on this board, there was a poster who said 99% of dudes would be in trouble if they were held accountable for what they did at 17. I think that's in incredibly untrue & insensitive remark to make. It's really along the lines of, "hey, who hasn't done this kind of thing."

But like I said, I don't care. We were talking about what potential voters are seeing. I think those who want equal treatment for women are seeing a much different dialogue nationally right now than those who are simply trying to defend the nominee at all costs, and I think if there is any backlash that comes out of this, it will be toward the right of the spectrum.


Yes you are BACKTRACKING


In your initial post you called out Fox News and Talk Radio specifically. When asked for specifics, all you can point to is some folks in the general population and on this board. That isn't Fox News and Talk Radio.

You are backtracking on providing examples of Fox News and Talk Radio. Hey, if you want to play the game of making unsubstantiated claims and use the "I don't do your homework for you", I am good wit it :)
 
Yes you are BACKTRACKING


In your initial post you called out Fox News and Talk Radio specifically. When asked for specifics, all you can point to is some folks in the general population and on this board. That isn't Fox News and Talk Radio.

You are backtracking on providing examples of Fox News and Talk Radio. Hey, if you want to play the game of making unsubstantiated claims and use the "I don't do your homework for you", I am good wit it :)

so here's some nitwit bragging about his Fox addiction

beyond stupid
 
Yes you are BACKTRACKING


In your initial post you called out Fox News and Talk Radio specifically. When asked for specifics, all you can point to is some folks in the general population and on this board. That isn't Fox News and Talk Radio.

You are backtracking on providing examples of Fox News and Talk Radio. Hey, if you want to play the game of making unsubstantiated claims and use the "I don't do your homework for you", I am good wit it :)

Seriously, you don't know what backtracking is.

I watch a fair amount of cable, including Fox, and I listen to talk radio. I hear & see stuff, and write about it.

I can't link the past moment in time when I was listening or seeing stuff; we don't have that kind of technology yet. And no, I'm not going to go trying to search youtube to find a moment on Fox that I saw on Monday.

It's silly. If you're not hearing that, it's not my problem. It's out there. I'll probably hear some more of it tonight when I'm watching cable again. I'll set up a camcorder and try to download to this site for you.
 
Seriously, you don't know what backtracking is.

I watch a fair amount of cable, including Fox, and I listen to talk radio. I hear & see stuff, and write about it.

I can't link the past moment in time when I was listening or seeing stuff; we don't have that kind of technology yet. And no, I'm not going to go trying to search youtube to find a moment on Fox that I saw on Monday.

It's silly. If you're not hearing that, it's not my problem. It's out there. I'll probably hear some more of it tonight when I'm watching cable again. I'll set up a camcorder and try to download to this site for you.

Got it spanky. It is ok that you are backtracking.

Maybe you should call in the FBI to investigate ;)
 
They haven't played me at all. Both sides do the same thing. I've been on record here saying that Kav will likely be confirmed, and frankly, unless something more compelling comes out on this, I think he should be. If Kav doesn't get confirmed, chances are someone as or more conservative will be ultimately. This isn't really a battle they should waste time on.

Outside of simply letting the process of this accusation play out. I'm not saying that if he's guilty, he should slide through. But there isn't enough there right now, without corroborating witnesses or other evidence, to create more than a he said/she said.

ok that's a overall reasonable answer from you. kudos.
 
Back
Top