Obama administration sought to "destroy Donald Trump" prior to the 2016 election.

'They're All Liars': Pirro Blasts Obama, Clapper, Comey for Trying to 'Destroy Donald Trump'

I for one am sick and tired of these liars, leakers and liberals attacking our President when they are the ones who tried to frame him.

In her Opening Statement, Judge Jeanine Pirro said Americans must come "face to face" with recent evidence showing that the Obama administration sought to "destroy Donald Trump" prior to the 2016 election.

On "Justice," Pirro said there is "hard evidence that the deep state planned to take down our duly elected president," adding that those responsible go from "President Obama, on down."


http://insider.foxnews.com/2018/05/...bama-clapper-comey-tried-destroy-donald-trump

... and he doesn't have a birth certificate either .. Donald Trump has conclusive proof. :rofl2:
 
Hello Legion,

Hello Legion,

You think President Obama said that the: "FBI investigation was just an insurance policy?"

Why would anybody think that?

Is there some sort of quote of him saying that which has been taken out of context?

May we please see a source for that?

You misunderstand which individual said what. I suspect you did so intentionally.

You claimed Obama said it right here:

I didn't say they "never thought he would win" and the "FBI investigation was just an insurance policy". Obama and Peter Strzok said it.

Right there. That's where you said 'Obama and Strzok said it.' Now you're not willing to show where Obama said it, only Strzok?

Or is it that you are trying to hold Obama responsible for what Strzok said?
 
Hello Darth,

There is no evidence of collusion lol.

The President's son, working on the candidate's campaign prior to the election, meets with Russians to get dirt on the opposing candidate, dirt which was subsequently released just before the election, apparently by the Russians, and you don't think this is evidence of collusion?

You are entitled to your own opinions, just not your own facts.

Because that right there is what we call evidence of collusion. It may not be the strongest evidence, but it is evidence. And I bet there is a lot more that Mueller is sitting on. I just hope he spills that pot o beans long about September!

When we get the truth out there maybe the voters of this nation will wise up before the next time they go to the booth.
 
Hello Darth,



The President's son, working on the candidate's campaign prior to the election, meets with Russians to get dirt on the opposing candidate, dirt which was subsequently released just before the election, apparently by the Russians, and you don't think this is evidence of collusion?

You are entitled to your own opinions, just not your own facts.

Because that right there is what we call evidence of collusion. It may not be the strongest evidence, but it is evidence. And I bet there is a lot more that Mueller is sitting on. I just hope he spills that pot o beans long about September!

When we get the truth out there maybe the voters of this nation will wise up before the next time they go to the booth.

Everyone in that meeting stated it was about Russian adoption and not Russian collusion.

Unless you have evidence they were lying, you have no evidence of collusion.
 
Hello Legion,

Perhaps there was no collusion between Trump and the Russians.

All the contacts between Trump operatives and Russians were mere coincidence! Yeah, that's it.

Hang on to that.

Hey. Nice diversionary question:

Trump hasn't been suspected of spying on anyone's campaign using federal resources, has he?

He has not been in an election since he held that power.
 
Comey announced the emails while they had started checking on Daffy. When he announced her email problem, Comey should have mentioned Trump was also being investigated for his horrible corrupt campaign.

McCain gave the pissgate dossier directly to Comey. Comey then arranged for its release to the press as a verified gpv't intelligence report.

:dunno:

The Clinton emails surfaced under a completely separate investigation, that could not be covered up, ... of Carlos Danger's diddling of young girls.
 
McCain gave the pissgate dossier directly to Comey. Comey then arranged for its release to the press as a verified gov't intelligence report. The Clinton emails surfaced under a completely separate investigation, that could not be covered up, ... of Carlos Danger's diddling of young girls.

He didn't actually "diddle" them, did he?
 
'They're All Liars': Pirro Blasts Obama, Clapper, Comey for Trying to 'Destroy Donald Trump'

I for one am sick and tired of these liars, leakers and liberals attacking our President when they are the ones who tried to frame him.

In her Opening Statement, Judge Jeanine Pirro said Americans must come "face to face" with recent evidence showing that the Obama administration sought to "destroy Donald Trump" prior to the 2016 election.

On "Justice," Pirro said there is "hard evidence that the deep state planned to take down our duly elected president," adding that those responsible go from "President Obama, on down."


http://insider.foxnews.com/2018/05/...bama-clapper-comey-tried-destroy-donald-trump

And Mitch McConnell was hellbent on stopping Obama. Just how politics works. Bitter hyperbole is practically mundane these days.
 
Hello Legion,

What I said was that I didn't say either thing. Obama said one thing and Strzok said another.

That's the opposite of what you previously said.

There's a record of what you said. If you really want everyone to believe you didn't say it, maybe you should go back and edit your post #27, which I quoted.

Your post #27 currently says:
Obama and Peter Strzok said it.
 
That's the opposite of what you previously said.There's a record of what you said. If you really want everyone to believe you didn't say it, maybe you should go back and edit your post #27, which I quoted. Your post #27 currently says:

Here's the post you seem determined to mischaracterize in its entirety:

I didn't say they "never thought he would win" and the "FBI investigation was just an insurance policy". Obama and Peter Strzok said it.
 
Hello hvilleherb,

'They're All Liars': Pirro Blasts Obama, Clapper, Comey for Trying to 'Destroy Donald Trump'

I for one am sick and tired of these liars, leakers and liberals attacking our President when they are the ones who tried to frame him.

In her Opening Statement, Judge Jeanine Pirro said Americans must come "face to face" with recent evidence showing that the Obama administration sought to "destroy Donald Trump" prior to the 2016 election.

On "Justice," Pirro said there is "hard evidence that the deep state planned to take down our duly elected president," adding that those responsible go from "President Obama, on down."


http://insider.foxnews.com/2018/05/...bama-clapper-comey-tried-destroy-donald-trump

"Jeanine Ferris Pirro (born June 2, 1951) is an American TV personality, former judge, prosecutor, and Republican politician in New York. Pirro is currently the host of Fox News Channel's Justice with Judge Jeanine. She is known for her staunchly pro-Trump commentary.[2]"

Wiki

The 'Opening Statement?'

Not a testimony.
Not under oath.
Not even in a courtroom!

This is a TV Judge!

I find it mind boggling that people believe this reality-TV garbage over the real news.

This isn't news.

It's just another talking head telling you what she thinks will keep you riveted to your device long enough so they can hit you with a commercial!

Pure tabloidism.

What garbage.

Sure is amazing how easy it is to get the right wing to swallow a hook.

Ya couldn't cram a better health care system down their throats, but THIS. This, they swallow like they can't get enough of it.

Simply amazing.
 
Hello Legion,

Here's the post you seem determined to mischaracterize in its entirety:

I didn't say they "never thought he would win" and the "FBI investigation was just an insurance policy". Obama and Peter Strzok said it.

Yeah. I keep thinking you said:
Obama and Peter Strzok said it.

But I'll get it right yet. You've patiently explained that when you said "Obama and Peter Strzok said it," you actually meant that 'Obama said one thing and Strzok said another. ' I'll get it. No problem. It just throws me off when you say one thing and then later claim it's the opposite. I struggle with those kinds of things. You understand. It's my bad. Really. But I'll try to keep up with your latest. The latest supersedes all previous statements, correct?

Actually this is very good practice, really. It makes it easier to keep up with the statements coming out of the Trump administration.
 
Hello Legion,

I wasn't aware "the main stream news" said it. It appears that you said it.

I did say it. So did the main stream news. That's where I got it. That's why I said the mainstream news said it.

Hey! Here's another fascinating tidbit:

The two are not mutually exclusive!

It is actually possible for the main stream news to say something, and then a listener tells someone else what he heard on the mainstream news. Then they both would have said the same thing. And one of them saying it does not exclude the other from saying it. Imagine that!
 
Hello Legion,

Are you anticipating that he will do what Obama is suspected of having done?

Obama is not suspected of having done what you or President Trump claims.

President Obama is not a suspect in any investigation.

President Trump IS.
 
Back
Top