Who told you that it was “in the eyes of God”?
Interesting Question: Can You Be A Strong Conservative And Support Gay Marriage?
- Thread starter rhym3pays
- Start date
Who told you that it was “in the eyes of God”?
Wow! A network TV show caused all that?
Funny how government being involved in marriage was a non-issue for Thumpers until gays started getting married.
It looks like you wish to deny marriage to those who don’t wish to have families. Restrictive little person, aren’t you?
SmarterthanYou
rebel
yes.
The Federal Government is not charged to incentivize anything. Correct?
Yet here it appears you're supporting it.
Truth Detector
Marriage is not a right nor is it defined as one in our constitution.
How is my statement in conflict of that amendment?
Marriage is not a right nor is it defined as one in our constitution.
How is my statement in conflict of that amendment?
You ignore the meaning and intent and basically argue that marriage is meaningless and that children are of no concern to a civilized society. It's an asinine argument lacking any historical factual basis.
"A prudent question is one half of wisdom." William James
The answer: not entirely.
A summary of our federal charter is named the preamble to the Constitution of the United States. It says:
One obvious example of such incentive: U.S. military conscription. President Trump may not conscript. But Nixon did, for a while, before he ended the draft during his truncated administration.
Well asked TD.
The answer: not entirely.
A summary of our federal charter is named the preamble to the Constitution of the United States. It says:
So in promoting the general welfare, incentive is not forsworn.
One obvious example of such incentive: U.S. military conscription. President Trump may not conscript. But Nixon did, for a while, before he ended the draft during his truncated administration.
What was the purpose of marriage? You'll find your answer there.
Name one good reason gays need to marry?
SmarterthanYou
rebel
its in conflict because your statement seems to indicate that we only have the rights that are defined within the Constitution/BoR, whereas the 9th makes it clear that we the people have so many more rights that aren't listed.
Cancel 2020.1
Canceled
By "the whole enchilada," do you mean equality and freedom for all people, instead of only for heterosexuals?
There were multiple reasons.
Among European royalty, marriages were sometimes used to consolidate & expand power, by marrying kingdoms together.
Most people got married in June because they took their yearly bath in
May and still smelled pretty good by June. However, they were starting
to smell so brides carried a bouquet of flowers to hide the body odor. Hence the custom today of carrying a bouquet when getting married.
Among European royalty, marriages were sometimes used to consolidate & expand power, by marrying kingdoms together.
Most people got married in June because they took their yearly bath in
May and still smelled pretty good by June. However, they were starting
to smell so brides carried a bouquet of flowers to hide the body odor. Hence the custom today of carrying a bouquet when getting married.
The 14th has NOTHING to do with marriage, nor does the Constitution. That's an absurd argument.
History. Who told you it wasn't?
Once again you get the facts and history wrong. It wasn't an issue until an activist agenda was passed by an activist court.