How else do the Norwegian's, etc get all that reindeer sausage. I bet legion is daft enough to think they get it sourced from Santa.
The elves have a butcher shop on the side. You haven't seen Rudolph in any recent films, have you?
How else do the Norwegian's, etc get all that reindeer sausage. I bet legion is daft enough to think they get it sourced from Santa.
The NRA nuts teach that liberals want the abolishment of gun rights. So they get them to believe all we liberal hunters, want this despite where we stand on guns. Just keep the friggen one man arsenal stuff out of the hands of the mentally ill. Is that so hard to compromise towards. They just give more slippery slope BS, like they give for all issues they demand a certain way on.
You might want to check into that for yourself shoog, for once.
The Scadi's are quite fond of guns. And healthcare are it turns out.
All progressive liberals don't get the vapors over firearms.
I own a few myself.
I offered a proposal early on: Democrats should shut the fuck up over guns if Republicans will shut the fuck up over abortion.
Other than that, I stay out of the gun argument, one way or another.
Why don't you make a list of which do and which don't?
So let me ask you, if a case as such reaches the Supreme Court and this supposed right to openly carry becomes a decision to allow Alaska's or Florida's gun laws to apply to your State would you still be apathetic on the issue?
by the 9th circuit, no less.
A federal appeals court ruled on Tuesday that the U.S. Constitution’s Second Amendment protects a right to openly carry a gun in public for self-defense, rejecting a claim by Hawaii officials that the right only applies to guns kept at home.
The extent of the right to gun ownership protected by the Second Amendment is one of the most hotly contested debates in the United States, where life has been punctuated by a steady stream of mass shootings.
The ruling issued by a three-judge panel on the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, based in San Francisco, came a year after the U.S. Supreme Court declined to rule either way on the carrying of guns in public.
Two of the three 9th Circuit judges voted to reverse a decision by the U.S. District Court in Hawaii that state officials did not infringe on the rights of George Young, the plaintiff, in twice denying him a permit to carry a gun outside.
“We do not take lightly the problem of gun violence,” Judge Diarmuid O’Scannlain wrote in Tuesday’s ruling. “But, for better or for worse, the Second Amendment does protect a right to carry a firearm in public for self-defense.”
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-...ion=true&utm_medium=Social&utm_source=Twitter
How else do the Norwegian's, etc get all that reindeer sausage. I bet legion is daft enough to think they get it sourced from Santa.
It is an inane decision especially since it used the Heller case as a precedent, that one goes in the hall of fame for stupidity
Because I asked Lum to do it.
Because I asked Lum to do it.
You posted it as a rhetorical question, as if you know the answer. But, as you say, no proof, no truth.
Are you daft enough to think Norway is a Communist or Socialist-controlled nation?
Doesn't the Constitution apply to every state?
I asked you. I'll understand if you are reluctant to answer.
Who are these "Scadis"?
Are they related to Communist or Socialist-controlled nations somehow?
You posted it as a rhetorical question, as if you know the answer.
So you say.
Will you rise up? I am waiting.
You are free to remain as ignorant about the world at large as you choose hon. Look the other way.