Assange dragged out of Embassy and arrested in London

Holy smoke, what a dick!
you should look at what the previous Ecuador leader said about this guy Moreno- Calls this guy a fascist.
Ecuador doesn't give a shit about a free press;s ability to publish- but Americans do.
https://theglobalamericans.org/2018...the-soul-of-ecuadors-and-latin-americas-left/
The extent of Ecuador’s apparent shift in direction was highlighted by the June 2018 visit by U.S. Vice-President Mike Pence, whose warm tone included not only discussions regarding expanded U.S. security assistance and commercial ties, but also consideration of a possible future bilateral trade agreement between the two countries.
^so who knows?
But you can be sure Moreno doesn't give a rat's ass about any press principles - just getting in good with Pence
 
Yes, listening this afternoon to the reasons, it seems the guest became abuse & ignored repeated warning not to continue fucking w/other countries etc & then the Prez of Ecuador got his shit hacked, thinking, maybe rightly so, it was the ungrateful "guest'....
That's the party line - but Moreno's word is not trustworthy.
seems to me 9 years of contact but no one else by Assange except in the embassy would gin up a few conflicts that can be hyped to a pretext of removal of Assange. Moreno has no use for him - allow the Brits in
 
One if lol.

Assange is on record claiming it was a leak and not a hack.

Will it suck if he can prove it?
why didn't Mueller approach him with an offer to ask him directly?
I'm sure he could have offered use immunity if nothing else.

But the Russiaphobes are all ginned up with "Wiki is an arm of Russian intelligence" cudgel to attack Putin
 
why didn't Mueller approach him with an offer to ask him directly?
I'm sure he could have offered use immunity if nothing else.

But the Russiaphobes are all ginned up with "Wiki is an arm of Russian intelligence" cudgel to attack Putin

It’s just one of the things that never made any sense about it.

Assange was a pivotal character in any collusion case since the email release was done through Wiki. And nobody wants to talk to him? They go after Stone hard, but they don’t even talk to Assange?

The only explanation I could come up with was they *didn't want to* talk to him.
 
It’s just one of the things that never made any sense about it.

Assange was a pivotal character in any collusion case since the email release was done through Wiki. And nobody wants to talk to him? They go after Stone hard, but they don’t even talk to Assange?

The only explanation I could come up with was they *didn't want to* talk to him.
in other words Assange didn't fit into Mueller's narrative
 
Assange will first face sentencing for failing to surrender to authorities on sexual assault charges in 2012.

Meanwhile, one of the Swedish women who accused Assange of rape has requested the case be reopened, further complicating the legal case against him.
 
Assange will first face sentencing for failing to surrender to authorities on sexual assault charges in 2012.

Meanwhile, one of the Swedish women who accused Assange of rape has requested the case be reopened, further complicating the legal case against him.

in other words Assange didn't fit into Mueller's narrative

I wonder if JPP liberals will "forget" their unbridled glee over Assange's arrest yesterday if they find out what Sean Langan reported.

:thinking:
 
Assange will first face sentencing for failing to surrender to authorities on sexual assault charges in 2012.

Meanwhile, one of the Swedish women who accused Assange of rape has requested the case be reopened, further complicating the legal case against him.

I saw that. No double jeopardy protection.

Looks like some people want him silenced quickly now that the Mueller report is about to be released.
 

Documentary filmmaker and former Taliban hostage Sean Langan, who has spent more than 50 hours with Assange in the past year.

According to Langan, Assange said Trump's associates are intellectually incapable of masterminding a complex collusion scheme with the Russians.

http://tinyurl.com/Assange-thinks-Trump-is-simple
 
Documentary filmmaker and former Taliban hostage Sean Langan, who has spent more than 50 hours with Assange in the past year.

According to Langan, Assange said Trump's associates are intellectually incapable of masterminding a complex collusion scheme with the Russians.

http://tinyurl.com/Assange-thinks-Trump-is-simple
no one has EVER come up with a scenarios for collusion.. It's farcical.
What would Putin do? ( and thus begats the "WIKI is a Russian asset" crap)

Can you even imagine how this was supposedly conspired? the Russiaphobes never detail how this plot was set up
 
It’s just one of the things that never made any sense about it.

Assange was a pivotal character in any collusion case since the email release was done through Wiki. And nobody wants to talk to him? They go after Stone hard, but they don’t even talk to Assange?

The only explanation I could come up with was they *didn't want to* talk to him.

Assange is "on record" stating firmly ... that the Russians were not his source.

I think that if Assange could be "bought off" ... he would have "sold out" a long time ago.

Now, "they" can use a stick instead of a carrot.
 
Last edited:
https://chicago.suntimes.com/opinion/julian-assange-wikileaks-free-press-first-amendment/
...the language of the indictment against Assange suggests that the Justice Department may be throwing too wide a lasso, trying to rope in and criminalize a legitimate practice of journalism.

“Assange knew that Manning was providing WikiLeaks with classified records containing national defense information of the United States,” the indictment states. “Assange was knowingly receiving such classified records from Manning for the purpose of publicly disclosing them on the WikiLeaks website.”
To which we would ask: So what? The New York Times, in receiving the Pentagon Papers from an anonymous source and publishing them, did exactly the same thing.

As the Supreme Court ruled in 2001 in the case of Bartnicki v. Vopper, the First Amendment protects publishers against legal liability for publishing political information that is lawfully obtained, even if the publisher’s source obtained the information by illegal means.

Why have the courts taken such a staunch stand in defense of the First Amendment? Because our nation’s founders made clear their belief in a free press as a check against a tyrannical government. And history has validated that belief.

The publication of the dryly pessimistic Pentagon Papers, for one, was pivotal in turning public opinion against the Vietnam War.

Is Assange some kind of journalist? Or has he been working as an agent of a foreign power, Russia?

And are President Trump and his Justice Department even on the same page on this?
 
no one has EVER come up with a scenarios for collusion.. It's farcical.
What would Putin do? ( and thus begats the "WIKI is a Russian asset" crap)

Can you even imagine how this was supposedly conspired? the Russiaphobes never detail how this plot was set up

The conspiracy theory is crap. All Putin had to do was to prey upon the naivety of vast numbers of potential voters.
 
The conspiracy theory is crap. All Putin had to do was to prey upon the naivety of vast numbers of potential voters.
so you're in for Russian meddling? Is that like what we did for Yeltsin? the Euromaidan?

Russia didn't accomplish anything -it's meager efforts were swamped by a $billion election
 
Back
Top