A primer and discussion of the 14th Amendment, Section 1.

[Grokmaster]

That term is defined in federal naturalization law as those, for example, who are children of foreign ambassadors or diplomatic personnel. So the kid of a ambassador born in the U. S. is not a citizen.

It refers to ANYONE who is the CITIZEN OF ANOTHER NATION, such as ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS....

 

[Flash]

It refers to ANYONE who is the CITIZEN OF ANOTHER NATION, such as ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS....

But any person born in the U. S. is a citizen unless they are employed by a foreign government in a diplomatic capacity. Over 300,000 children are born in the U. S. each year to illegal immigrants--all of them are citizens.

 

[Micawber]

You best pipe the fuck down then.

Rather you should pick the pipe up so you can dream you are one. Clearly you care.... a lot.

 

[Micawber]

Yes...is there something about "ANY" you don't understand? That's a pretty significant qualification but think about it. Why shouldn't all people in our nation, regardless of their legal status, have the right to due process and equal protection before the law? It would be uncivilized not too.

The civility test has been nullified by Trump.

 

[Micawber]

They can’t stand the fact that our Constitution requires our government to give Due Process to All Persons.

To not stand it, one would think they would first seekingly determine what it means, its origin, its internal logic and divisions.

Ain't happening, not here, not with these morons. Shall we dig again into the well tilled soil of procedural versus substantive at all? Why bother?
These people are fucking morons. Trump Trump Trump! That's the beginning middle and end of their thinking.

 

[Poor Richard Saunders]

This was the intent of the Founding Fathers and is worded to include “all persons born or ...”

I hardly think the founding fathers had any intent because they were dead and they didn't write the 14th amendment.

 

[Sailor]

Rather you should pick the pipe up so you can dream you are one. Clearly you care.... a lot.

??????????? If you are trying to challenge me as to if you are in fact an attorney or not, please try. I have no problem proving you are liar again, "counselor".

 

[USFREEDOM911]

To not stand it, one would think they would first seekingly determine what it means, its origin, its internal logic and divisions.

Ain't happening, not here, not with these morons. Shall we dig again into the well tilled soil of procedural versus substantive at all? Why bother?
These people are fucking morons. Trump Trump Trump! That's the beginning middle and end of their thinking.

[translation]--Micawber melting down-->

<---[/translation]

​