California becomes first state to ban hairstyle discrimination

Originally Posted by Text Drivers are Killers
Another freedom taken from us. A private business should be free to refuse service or employment to anyone for any reason.!!

You can so long as your business is the KKK and you are open only to your KKK buddies on your KKK land serving KKK piss water.
Then you would only have to look at ugly fat white guys with no hair at all! Wouldn't that be splendiferous!
 
You can so long as your business is the KKK and you are open only to your KKK buddies on your KKK land serving KKK piss water.
Then you would only have to look at ugly fat white guys with no hair at all! Wouldn't that be splendiferous!

Better than looking at a bunch of oily, greasy black boys flashing their EBT cards.
 
I have several NA friends in both real life and in the cyber world. The thing about their children -- especially boys -- wearing braids and having issues with school personnel is a problem in a lot of areas, including Canadian schools.

I can imagine that is the case. Especially kids. They aren't very developed and can be cruel, much like our colleagues here to the right. The difference is the
biological excuse.
 
I can imagine that is the case. Especially kids. They aren't very developed and can be cruel, much like our colleagues here to the right. The difference is the
biological excuse.

Is that the excuse you use in refusing to acknowledge your inferiority?

Maybe that's the one OwlWoman uses to justify hiding.
 
Then you didn't think about OWH's metaphor.

And California thinks people in your public restaurant should also. Public establishments should not be treated by their owners like a Southern gated community in 1945
with restrictive covenants.

Alright, but don't be surprised when this drives more people to the Right.
 
I bet CFM didn't feel the same way about what is or is not appropriate dress when he was a greasy stoner in high school wearing cut off jeans
 
Alright, but don't be surprised when this drives more people to the Right.

Like I said, you could be right. Society will advance, by and by, with our benevolent shepherding. I've sent my
cattle dogs to fend off the orange hyena that has led you astray.
 
Probably, with your help that is, lots of breathing into paper sacks, clutching of pearls and imagery of black savages screwing virgin white girls
and very little reading of statutes. I know the game.

Eventually civilization wins though. That's why California leads and you people inevitably follow.

It sounds like you're trying to avoid my point.
 
I bet CFM didn't feel the same way about what is or is not appropriate dress when he was a greasy stoner in high school wearing cut off jeans

Never was nor did either of those, BOY. But do keep dreaming that you're not inferior to me.
 
Like I said, you could be right. Society will advance, by and by, with our benevolent shepherding. I've sent my
cattle dogs to fend off the orange hyena that has led you astray.

Society will advance despite inferior beings like you in it.
 
I can imagine that is the case. Especially kids. They aren't very developed and can be cruel, much like our colleagues here to the right. The difference is the
biological excuse.

It's not so much the other kids making fun of a young man with a braid, it's the adults who should know better. Another issue that has been a problem with NA students is wearing a symbol of their nation or clan as part of their graduation garb. Alaska recently passed a law allowing indigenous students to combine traditional symbols with their official graduation stuff. Here NMU is pretty lenient. My friends who just graduated in May wore their medallions, eagle feathers, beadwork. A couple of examples:

wsEqBos.jpg


The girl on the right majored in physics, can you tell? lol
 
You can so long as your business is the KKK and you are open only to your KKK buddies on your KKK land serving KKK piss water.
Then you would only have to look at ugly fat white guys with no hair at all! Wouldn't that be splendiferous!

Under federal anti-discrimination laws, businesses can """refuse service to any person for any reason""", unless the business is discriminating against a protected class.

At the national level, protected classes include:

Race or color
National origin or citizenship status
Religion or creed
Sex
Age
Disability, pregnancy, or genetic information
Veteran status



Long hair,tats etc are a choice and not listed ! IDIOT
 
Last edited:
...which miraculously is more productive than any.

Isn't it amazing the paradox? Were you aware that in history the most egregiously repressive regimes ever were the MOST productive?
The USSR practically carried the industrial revolution. They mopped the floor with us!

grok some on it while hyperventilating

The Soviet economy was in the gutter. Its only real accomplishment was outproducing Germany during the war. The Nazis, meanwhile, were the only economy to really escape from the Depression prewar. Now, China has a fairly impressive economy at the moment. Command economies can sometimes accomplish feats in the short term. Fascism improved Italian productivity, although, that's not really a feat considering how unproductive Italians are known to be.
 
It's not so much the other kids making fun of a young man with a braid, it's the adults who should know better. Another issue that has been a problem with NA students is wearing a symbol of their nation or clan as part of their graduation garb. Alaska recently passed a law allowing indigenous students to combine traditional symbols with their official graduation stuff. Here NMU is pretty lenient. My friends who just graduated in May wore their medallions, eagle feathers, beadwork. A couple of examples:

wsEqBos.jpg


The girl on the right majored in physics, can you tell? lol

Two affirmative action beneficiaries.
 
It sounds like you're trying to avoid my point.

I didn't in the least. You made two points by the way.

1. Freedom of association
2. It's a sales pitch for the right and a loser for the left

I addressed both over the course of the last several pages if you are a careful reader.

1. Is a battle between conflicting positive and negative liberties, and I professed my belief your positive liberty argument is a figleaf over ugly prejudice
2. I agreed, and that your win is short termed and helped by hyperbolic bullshit and fear not reality.

And while I'm making these concessions, hasten to add none of these bootstrap brilliant private business moguls (LOL) , individual liberty dudes care to acknowledge
these businesses are open to that nasty concept called "the public." Apparently owning a business includes an absolute right to trammel everyone with whom
ones does business. Razor blade burgers on sale now! The second you concede one cannot do whatever the fuck one wants just because they own something,
that is the second that argument loses, because then we are not debating the fact that you are a prostitute, we are negotiating the price. I say not discriminating
against hair you hate that happens to be worn 99.999999 percent by black people is not too high a price.


You can't do business with the public and arbitrarily discriminate against blacks.. This is not a new concept, it's a refinement.
 
So freedom is now for the right wing conservatives a one way street in which every tom dick and harriet can discriminate. How nice is that. Righties need to wear a hat that says 'we discriminate based on anything at all' so that we know who they are and just how un-American they are. We'll still serve them as we are still Americans, they on the other hand are....

Maybe you should tell that to the military or a hospital.
 
Back
Top