It sounds like you're trying to avoid my point.
I didn't in the least. You made two points by the way.
1. Freedom of association
2. It's a sales pitch for the right and a loser for the left
I addressed both over the course of the last several pages if you are a careful reader.
1. Is a battle between conflicting positive and negative liberties, and I professed my belief your positive liberty argument is a figleaf over ugly prejudice
2. I agreed, and that your win is short termed and helped by hyperbolic bullshit and fear not reality.
And while I'm making these concessions, hasten to add none of these bootstrap brilliant private business moguls (LOL) , individual liberty dudes care to acknowledge
these businesses are open to that nasty concept called "the public." Apparently owning a business includes an absolute right to trammel everyone with whom
ones does business. Razor blade burgers on sale now! The second you concede one cannot do whatever the fuck one wants just because they own something,
that is the second that argument loses, because then we are not debating the fact that you are a prostitute, we are negotiating the price. I say not discriminating
against hair you hate that happens to be worn 99.999999 percent by black people is not too high a price.
You can't do business with the public and arbitrarily discriminate against blacks.. This is not a new concept, it's a refinement.