Did Russian Interference Affect the 2016 Election Results?

really? so Mueller was not going to confirm no collusion by his findings? why not?
maybe because he had no proof of a conspiracy and had to he had no evidence.

He still weaseled the "can't exonerate" obstruction junk for the Dems to continue to kick around
for political damage to Trump

They are going to at least say there was evidence of obstruction or something negative. If they are going to design an entire campaign to get rid of Trump they are not going to conclude he did nothing wrong--that defeats the purpose.
 
Why DID OBAMA LET IT HAPPEN...DESPITE MONTHS OF FOREWARNING????

Obama cyber chief confirms 'stand down' order against Russian cyberattacks in summer 2016


https://www.yahoo.com/news/obama-cy...ssian-cyberattacks-summer-2016-204935758.html


WHY ISN'T THE DUNCE-O-CRAT HOUSE "INVESTIGATING" THAT???!!!

That has been discussed. Both Obama and McConnell did not want to raise the issue because it would appear to be interfering in the election or appear to be trying to influence the outcome.
 
neither do you.........no matter how much you squirm about exoneration, Mueller says they did NOT conclude the President committed a crime.......so, when you say he did, his two year investigation says you're a fucking liar.......

You are lying. Mueller said he could not indict a sitting president. That was the rules of the justice department. His list of obstructions that Trump may have committed disproves your absolutely wrong post again. He said that his department was not the place to get justice for the American people. He saw the power of the house and senate as the proper system to deal with a crooked president.
 
How about you just post that last sentence, first paragraph, page 66. It certainly does not agree with what you are trying to sell.

Not true, doesn't come close to invalidating the facts, the Russians were all over the Trump campaign

Mueller explained, he didn't have the actual evidence to establish direct planned coordination, but he heavily documented Russian involvement in Trump's campaign and the campaign's use and eagerness for that help
 
really? so Mueller was not going to confirm no collusion by his findings? why not?
maybe because he had no proof of a conspiracy and had to he had no evidence.

He still weaseled the "can't exonerate" obstruction junk for the Dems to continue to kick around
for political damage to Trump

Thanks Sean
 
That has been discussed. Both Obama and McConnell did not want to raise the issue because it would appear to be interfering in the election or appear to be trying to influence the outcome.

Imagine the "deep state" conspiracies Sean and the demogogues could fabricate if Obama did raise the issue? Especially if it cost Trump the election
 
Imagine the "deep state" conspiracies Sean and the demogogues could fabricate if Obama did raisehe issue? Especially if it cost Trump the election

The Yahoo article has a link to the book. It says when Daniel started efforts to secure state voting systems the red states resisted because they did not want federal interference. Also, that Russia thought Hillary would win and was not trying to flip votes as much as weaken her position.

It was also an attempt to delegitimize the election which seems to have worked based on the opinions of a lot of our posters--that Trump is not the legitimate president.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/stand-obama-team-blew-response-russian-meddling-100024634.html
 
You are lying.
I gave you the quote......unless you are arguing that what I quoted isn't in the report its obvious I am not lying.......and, if I am not lying, it is equally obvious you are.......so the question becomes, WHY are you lying when it is so obvious that you are?......

Trump may have committed

no.....he gave a list of offenses Trump COULD have committed and then stated he found no evidence leading him to conclude that Trump had committed any crimes......even if he had said Trump MAY have committed any, he concluded that he didn't.....
 
definitely

Russia has been using false propaganda campaigns quite successfully since 1917, or they wouldn't bother

weird how right wingers defend Russia and Putin at every opportunity, eh?
.
I haven't heard any defense of Russia. Only doubts that the election results were changed which neither side can produce any evidence of. Did Russian interference affect the 2018 election results? The government has brought prosecutions for interference in that election.

Since Russian involvement sought to delegitimize the election and many of our posters have said Trump is not the legitimate president, their propaganda obviously worked on the anti-Trump people, also. After all, they did not think Trump would actually win.

Why did Obama tell the security people to "stand down" in their efforts to counter Russian interference?

https://www.yahoo.com/news/stand-oba...100024634.html

What is your evidence it affected even one vote? They also intervened on behalf of Sanders, does that mean some voted for Sanders because of Russian propaganda?
 
Not true, doesn't come close to invalidating the facts, the Russians were all over the Trump campaign

Mueller explained, he didn't have the actual evidence to establish direct planned coordination, but he heavily documented Russian involvement in Trump's campaign and the campaign's use and eagerness for that help

Why are you afraid to post the last sentence, first paragraph on page 66? It completely invalidates your left wing and conspiracy talking points.
 
Why are you afraid to post the last sentence, first paragraph on page 66? It completely invalidates your left wing and conspiracy talking points.

It has already been posted, a favorite of Trumpkins attempting to rationalize Trump accepting, using, requesting, and then denying help from a foreign nation antagonistic to the US in his election campaign
 
Back
Top