Florida man found guilty of manslaughter in parking lot shooting that led to 'Stand Y

This is how racism works folks


Place your self in the murdered mans position FIRST in these situations folks


if the Man had been white every one of you would have done that immediately


but he was black so INSTEAD you placed your self in the murders place to view the incident


we want black men to take care of their families RIGHT?????


and this man DID


his family was being ATTACKED AND HARRASSED


AND FOR SOME DAMN REASON YOU COULD NOT SEE THAT FROM THE BEGINING?
 
he is blocking the mans access to his car with his children inside and is standing very close to the woman blocking her from going somewhere else

He approached their CAR they did not approach HIM


who was threatening whom ?


and they were RIGHT to be afraid for their children's lives huh

Dear Fucking Idiot,

So in retard land, where you reside, words are more threatening than being physically assaulted? One person used words. The other person committed an assault. Yes retard, shoving someone to the ground is assault, even if the person is exchanging words with your girlfriend. He didn't push the guy to the ground so he could leave. He did it because he was angry and he was also much bigger and stronger, so he felt he could. And why doesn't someone have a right to "approach" someone else? I think the jury got it right, he didn't need to shoot the guy. But that doesn't make the victim blameless.

Fuck you very much and bite a dead mule's cock.

-Sirthinksalot
 
Its easy to have an opinion on the topic when you're somewhere else and dont know the facts. Transcripts are way too expensive. Try the case of austin bodahl and daniel kelly. Kelly won in court. It cost him a whole sixty dollars and the prosecution its career.
 
so a black man has to just let crazy fucks scream at them and block their access to their own car with their children inside?

you people are fucking racists
 
Dear Fucking Idiot,

So in retard land, where you reside, words are more threatening than being physically assaulted? One person used words. The other person committed an assault. Yes retard, shoving someone to the ground is assault, even if the person is exchanging words with your girlfriend. He didn't push the guy to the ground so he could leave. He did it because he was angry and he was also much bigger and stronger, so he felt he could. And why doesn't someone have a right to "approach" someone else? I think the jury got it right, he didn't need to shoot the guy. But that doesn't make the victim blameless.

Fuck you very much and bite a dead mule's cock.

-Sirthinksalot

Its not about an equal match of force. Men are innately weapons themselves and by the sounds of it the shooter felt he was being threatened by a weapon. You dont roll up on someone in a threatening manor. You're issuing a threat of consequences, you have to be prepared for consequences. He wasnt prepared, who was the noun you used. Junky nazi.
 
Its not about an equal match of force. Men are innately weapons themselves and by the sounds of it the shooter felt he was being threatened by a weapon. You dont roll up on someone in a threatening manor. You're issuing a threat of consequences, you have to be prepared for consequences. He wasnt prepared, who was the noun you used. Junky nazi.

who rolled up on whom you fucking idiot?


he walked out of the store to see some ASSHOLE MAN threatening his wife and children and blocking his access to his own vehicle


But hes was Black and the people he was protecting are black so your racist fucking ass sides with a murderer
 
NO ONE APPROACHED THE MURDERER


the man was walking back to his OWN VEHICLE and was killed for keeping the guy away from his family and his car
 
Its not about an equal match of force. Men are innately weapons themselves and by the sounds of it the shooter felt he was being threatened by a weapon. You dont roll up on someone in a threatening manor. You're issuing a threat of consequences, you have to be prepared for consequences. He wasnt prepared, who was the noun you used. Junky nazi.

I think you meant to reply quote evince, not me. I didn't use the word "prepared".
 
Here's some interesting points mentioned by our friends at SF

>prosecution played slow motion version of the security footage to make it seem like he waited longer before shooting
>testimony about the PCP in his system was banned by the judge
>testimony about the drugs in his pocket was banned by judge
>sheriff who said it was a legal shooting was banned from testifying by judge
>prosecutor called drejka a "right wing nutjob" and said "a real man doesn't carry a gun"
>his prior felony arrests for assault was banned from being mentioned by the judge
>some woman who claims drejka once threatened her was allowed to testify even though there is no police report or any evidence to back up her story
 
the guy was keeping him from getting in his own car asshole and screaming at his wife


but to you racists


black people have NO RIGHTS
 
who rolled up on whom you fucking idiot?


he walked out of the store to see some ASSHOLE MAN threatening his wife and children and blocking his access to his own vehicle


But hes was Black and the people he was protecting are black so your racist fucking ass sides with a murderer

Where is your evidence that he was "threatening" and not merely "scolding"? Words have meaning, retard.
 
The murderer told the POLICE that the victim lunged at him right before he shot him

the man was backing away to HIS OWN CAR

the murderer was threatening this mans children, wife and vehicle


he had a right to protect his family and property
 
Where is your evidence that he was "threatening" and not merely "scolding"? Words have meaning, retard.

where is your proof the man on the ground felt threatened asshole


The man protecting is family felt threatened


WHERE WAS HIS RIGHT TO STAND HIS GROUND?
 
Back
Top