"John Bolton willing to testify in Trump's impeachment trial"

Trump said a lot of stuff, the majority of which turned out to be a lie or fabrication, few outside of the Fox bubble believe anything Trump says, he wasn't correct then, nor is he correct now, otherwise he would let anyone on his staff testify to set the record straight

I find these claims from leftist liars ironic; the PHONY media and Democratic Party of the Jackass have been LYING about the man since his election.
 
There doesn't need to be any more evidence presented at trial Arsecheese; that was the House's job. But thank you for proving what a weak, stupid and pathetic case the Democratic Party of the Jackass has.

Really, so new evidence that surfaces before a trial begins or even during that trial can't be considered cause a Grand Jury already indited the person?
 
I find these claims from leftist liars ironic; the PHONY media and Democratic Party of the Jackass have been LYING about the man since his election.

Yeah, yeah, yeah, we know, Democrats are still mad Trump got elected, and even if true, that anger would be pale in comparison to the hate the right felt and expressed when America elected a black guy President, twice, and by substantial majorities each time
 
And that vindicates Trump? If that is Trump's defense he is in trouble, that is like taking the word of a guy with a gun pointed at his head saying he never felt intimidated

Trump doesn't need vindication. He hasn't been charged with any high crimes or misdemeanors.
 
We already have it you ignorant stooge; he clearly said there was NO pressure to do anything. :rolleyes:

Did he say it under oath? Did he say it in a Court of Law?

And as I just told your comrade, if that is Trump's defense he is in trouble, that is like taking the word of a guy with a gun pointed at his head saying he never felt intimidated
 
Hello Darth,

Trump said there was no collusion, no conspiracy and it was a hoax.

Right on all three counts.

Why don’t you believe him now?

You'd believe him if he said he never promised to release his taxes.

Most people do not like being lied to.

Trump fans are strange about that.
 
Really, so new evidence that surfaces before a trial begins or even during that trial can't be considered cause a Grand Jury already indited the person?

What evidence has been provided that justifies impeachment shit-for-brains? You don't get do-overs in elections or impeachment. You don't get to add to the evidence after an impeachment vote.

Trump will be tried on the articles and evidence provided; assuming Pelosi will ever present them to the Senate. That means, he will not get convicted, he will win re-election and you morons will lie, cry and flail for another four years.
 

Fiona Hill testimony details stunning meeting, John Bolton ...
https://www.businessinsider.com › fiona-hill-testimony-details-stunning-me...
Nov 8, 2019 - "You go and tell Eisenberg that I am not part of whatever drug deal Sondland and Mulvaney are cooking up on this," Bolton said, according to ..
 
Yeah, yeah, yeah, we know, Democrats are still mad Trump got elected, and even if true, that anger would be pale in comparison to the hate the right felt and expressed when America elected a black guy President, twice, and by substantial majorities each time

They also voted in majority for someone other than the IMPEACHED ONE.
 
Fiona Hill testimony details stunning meeting, John Bolton ...
https://www.businessinsider.com › fiona-hill-testimony-details-stunning-me...
Nov 8, 2019 - "You go and tell Eisenberg that I am not part of whatever drug deal Sondland and Mulvaney are cooking up on this," Bolton said, according to ..

Which would be one of the questions addressed at Bolton, why did he describe it as such
 
Yeah, yeah, yeah, we know, Democrats are still mad Trump got elected, and even if true,

Why do you pretend otherwise? Is it because you are patently stupid, or just a lying dishonest buffoon?

that anger would be pale in comparison to the hate the right felt and expressed when America elected a black guy President, twice, and by substantial majorities each time

How about some evidence of the "hate" shown towards Obama that even remotely compares to the blatant, despicable hatred shown by the PHONY media and Democratic Party of the Jackass towards Trump?

Did House Republicans publicly call Obama a grifter?
Did House Republicans publicly call Obama a Traitor?
Did House Republicans publicly call Obama a mobster?
Did House Republicans publicly call Obama a criminal?

You lying leftist hypocrites need to STFU, seriously.
 
Did he say it under oath? Did he say it in a Court of Law?

Why should he? Is there a criminal trial going on we don't know about? Has Trump been charged with anything criminal?

And as I just told your comrade, if that is Trump's defense he is in trouble, that is like taking the word of a guy with a gun pointed at his head saying he never felt intimidated

Trump doesn't need a defense; he has the facts on his side. Democrats have a clown show and hyperbole. That is why they will FAIL to win in 2020 and FAIL to convict Trump of anything.

No shit-for-brains; we don't impeach Presidents because we don't like them. Dunce.
 
What evidence has been provided that justifies impeachment shit-for-brains? You don't get do-overs in elections or impeachment. You don't get to add to the evidence after an impeachment vote.

Trump will be tried on the articles and evidence provided; assuming Pelosi will ever present them to the Senate. That means, he will not get convicted, he will win re-election and you morons will lie, cry and flail for another four years.

Once again, so are telling us that new evidence that surfaces before a trial begins or even during that trial can't be considered cause the person was already indited?

And by the way, they can impeach Trump again tomorrow, another House Committee reveals evidence Trump abused his office on another matter and the whole process can begin again, there is one and done rule
 
Back
Top