It’s time to call them all traitors and lock up all who threaten election officials r

SmarterthanYou said:
what do you think the bill of rights actually does? do you even really know?

No one can read our Constitution without concluding that the people who wrote it wanted their government severely limited; the words "no" and "not" employed in restraint of government power occur 24 times in the first seven articles of the Constitution and 22 more times in the Bill of Rights.
Click to expand...


And yet we have EXTENSIVE powers outlined in Articles I, II and III of the constitution, including the federal government's ability to regulate interstate commerce, the legislative branch's power to tax and spend, the judicial branch's ability to determine constitutionality of the laws, the power to declare war, etc.

Just because the word "no" appears a lot in a document doesn't mean the entire document is about negative rights. Dumbfuck.
 
blackascoal said:
Trump and his horde of traitors should be identified as such and the toy soldiers who threaten election officials should be locked up on felony charges. Threatening government offices of the United States is a felony, and it’s long past time for Trump traitors to face the consequences of their actions.

Imagine if armed mobs of African-Americans showed up at the homes of election officials threatening them and their families. Many would be shot and others would be locked up facing 5-10 year penalties.

Time to stop coddling traitors to democracy and this nation.

There is no legitimate argument for claiming the election was stolen when Trump lost by 7 million votes and hasn’t made ONE legitimate argument that can hold up in court.

tHEY ARE TRAITORS.
Click to expand...

You first, what are you waiting for?
 
SmarterthanYou said:
if you require the government to tell you what the constitution means, you're a failed american and a traitor

the government was not made the exclusive or final judge of the extent of the powers delegated to itself. - thomas jefferson.
Click to expand...

The judiciary is responsible for determining which laws comport with the constitution, dumbass.

lol @ barstool, shooting-range constitutional scholars who do nothing but cherry-pick bullshit they don't understand.

Jefferson also was a proponent of executive power when he became president, which was pretty well confirmed when he expanded the physical size of the country by 150% with the stroke of a pen (the rights and lives of natives be damned).
 
archives said:
If one wants to get technical, no the Bill of Rights is not part of the original Constitution, as you know it was an addendum, wasn't written at the Convention, and was actually ratified three years after the Constitution was ratified

As was explained to you previously, you are confusing natural rights and political rights, assuming they are the same, and the bottom line with any of it is reason, rights are based upon reason, not desire
Click to expand...

the constitution and bill of rights was ratified to limit the new federal government. the bill of rights lists a few natural rights that the federal government has zero power or authority over. EVERY SINGLE PIECE OF HISTORICAL DOCUMENTATION MAKES THAT VERY CLEAR.
 
Jerome said:
He probably confuses the constitution and the Declaration. Those 3%ers are FAMOUSLY fucking retarded. My neck of the woods is choc-full of those broke-ass, armyboy drag-queen douchebags.
Click to expand...

your boyfriend bought you some new knee pads, go use them and stick your tongue back in his ass
 
Jerome said:
And yet we have EXTENSIVE powers outlined in Articles I, II and III of the constitution, including the federal government's ability to regulate interstate commerce, the legislative branch's power to tax and spend, the judicial branch's ability to determine constitutionality of the laws, the power to declare war, etc.

Just because the word "no" appears a lot in a document doesn't mean the entire document is about negative rights. Dumbfuck.
Click to expand...

limited government, limited powers, coward.
 
Jerome said:
The judiciary is responsible for determining which laws comport with the constitution, dumbass.
Click to expand...
the very first thing you got right since i've seen you on this board, fuckstick

Jerome said:
lol @ barstool, shooting-range constitutional scholars who do nothing but cherry-pick bullshit they don't understand.
Click to expand...
you're the one who needs the government to tell you what it means, not I, moron

Jerome said:
Jefferson also was a proponent of executive power when he became president, which was pretty well confirmed when he expanded the physical size of the country by 150% with the stroke of a pen (the rights and lives of natives be damned).
Click to expand...

Jefferson became a hypocritical bastard when he realized that those limited powers he campaigned for limited his ability as president, as all tyrants come to find out and as all tyrants brainwash pussies like you in to believing that the constitution limits the people.
 
Concart said:
No they cannot be unlimited. The court has decided this. So do you refuse to acknowledge the role of the court? The Constitution does not bestow rights.
Click to expand...

It's clear that that douchebag doesn't understand the Constitution, rights that were derived from the Constitution, courts, and the law. I'm always surprised at how so many people develop such forceful opinions about politics and then join political discussion sites without knowing about politics.
 
Diesel said:
It's clear that that douchebag doesn't understand the Constitution, rights that were derived from the Constitution, courts, and the law. I'm always surprised at how so many people develop such forceful opinions about politics and then join political discussion sites without knowing about politics.
Click to expand...

the founders disagree with you. they knew rights come from humanity, not the government or a piece of paper..........i'm always surprised at how so many people blindly and ignorantly accepted that it was ok for the government to tell them they dont have rights, or all rights can be regulated........
 
Micawber said:
Long overdue on the traitor tag, Bac man... Repukes would cut their shriveled nuts off to save white America
from pluralism.
Click to expand...

They shit on the Constitution daily and then play lip service to it. Republicans don't give a flying fuck about the country or the Constitution. They're literally trying to remove democracy from the political system.
 
Concart said:
OMFG you are a complete moron. We have three branches of government so that those three branches can do EXACTLY what you claim they were not intended to do. You are totally worthless. It's sublime.
Click to expand...

We also elect our representatives to limit their tyranny, unlike the monarchy we freed ourselves from. Only they don't want the people to elect the representatives. They want those representatives chosen by those limited courts. :laugh: These people are hypocritical, low-information trash every second of every day.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
federally? the federal government has no power to decide on abortion rights, period. that all comes down to state constitutions...........and most of those have no power over it either.
Click to expand...

That's not what the SCOTUS said. They do sometimes make bad decisions, but they are still the law of the land whether we like them or not.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
the founders disagree with you. they knew rights come from humanity, not the government or a piece of paper..........i'm always surprised at how so many people blindly and ignorantly accepted that it was ok for the government to tell them they dont have rights, or all rights can be regulated........
Click to expand...

I think there are some good reasons to limit rights. We have different political philosophies, but your political knowledge is inadeqaute.
 
blackascoal said:
Imagine if armed mobs of African-Americans showed up at the homes of election officials threatening them and their families.
Click to expand...

wasn't that called, "the summer of 2020"?.......

0747ab29-2121-46dd-84f2-973f41bcadc4-Racial_Injustice_Portland_--_AP_--_8_1_20.jpg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top