Don’t be ashamed, you’re a conspiracy theorist lol.
There are worse things. Embrace it.
I'm for a full investigation, Opie. You're the conspiracy theorist who is afraid to embrace the facts.
Don’t be ashamed, you’re a conspiracy theorist lol.
There are worse things. Embrace it.
I'm for a full investigation, Opie. You're the conspiracy theorist who is afraid to embrace the facts.
Really lol?
What facts are those? Don’t change the subject.
Facts stemming from an investigation.
Was Ashli Babbit the only pro-Trumper there and all the rest were Antifa/BLM?
Were any Antifa/BLM in the crowd?
Who organized the militias and what was the plan?
There are lots of questions remaining unanswered and you're the one against finding them.
For someone who raised this argument you seem to know not much about it.
Watergate took four years, if I remember correctly. They need an airtight case in order for it to be prosecutable.
Doesn’t work.
Indict him for simple conspiracy to commit a crime and add the bigger indictments later. Get him behind bars. Why don’t they do it?
Or are there ‘complicating factors’ at play with Rhodes?
It is the only thing that has ever worked in the past. It does not work every time, but randomly arresting someone and hoping the evidence presents itself in the future is a lot less likely to work.
Conspiracy is always a tough case to make. It is tougher here, because there is no direct benefit, and possible not even direct orders. If he paid someone to commit crimes, that would be easier (but still tough). He suggested they commit crimes, which is a tough case.
Any judge would know this was a tough case, and give favorable bail. The defense attorney would know it is a weak case, and push for a speedy trial. Cases like this tend to fall apart on the first day.
Imagine how stupid a prosecutor would feel if a week after the case was dismissed he finally got the co-conspirators to testify against Rhodes.... Remember, there are no second bites at that apple.
There are complicating factors in any conspiracy trial of defendants not directly involved with the crime.
If they can’t get anything else on him, oh well. No harm done.
Double jeopardy means that if they cannot get a conviction, without any evidence, then he gets to walk free. It does not matter how much evidence they get six months from now, he is forever free. That is a huge amount of harm done.
An indictment is just a charge. They can charge him for jaywalking. Double jeopardy only applies to actual trials. You can’t try a person twice for the same offense.
You are failing to respond to my point. Once a prosecutor gets an indictment in a case that cannot be supported, the defense is going to immediately start pushing for a speedy trial. Without the evidence, that speedy trial will be quite speedy indeed. Then there is no second bite at the apple.
My book won an award
Talk to Capitol trespassers in solitary confinement about a speedy trial and get back with me. What is it, six months and no trial date? Where is the ACLU?
Talk to Capitol trespassers in solitary confinement about a speedy trial and get back with me. What is it, six months and no trial date? Where is the ACLU?
All these convictions WILL be overturned...
Somehow I doubt it.
Talk to Capitol trespassers in solitary confinement about a speedy trial and get back with me. What is it, six months and no trial date? Where is the ACLU?
Agreed. Son of the Revolution is living in a fantasy world.