Omicron Not the Last Variant - Thank Righties for the Next One

My assertion is that a natural infection with the SARS-COV-2 virus is not the same in any way to the natural immunity from a smallpox, a measles, a mumps, a chickenpox, or even an influence infection.
Your assertion ignores and discards microbiology.
The virus is not some weaponized Chinese creation.
Unknown.
It is a coronavirus. This group behaves differently than the more familiar DNA viruses.
So?

Incomplete argument.
 
they are becoming less dangerous with each variant......the next, Demicron, will be 100% contagious.......the only symptom will be a burning fart that smells so bad the people around you pass out......it only happens once......Fauci will demand people mask their ass......

There is no such thing as a variant of a variant. It's not possible.
 
Bret and Heather said just yesterday that we might still get a very deadly form of SARS-COV2, and that it likely is now mutating in Animals is a bad omen. Omicron either came from an animal reservoir or it was man made likely.

There is no such thing as a variant of a variant. It is not possible.
 
They have been naming the variants after letters of the Greek alphabet. There are quite a few letters between "Delta" and "Omicron." Looks like every so often a new one proves to be contagious/virulent enough to replicate across wide populations. How many letters are left till we get to Omega?

Y38sKjq.jpg

Why wasn't Omicron named "Xi"? I understand that people would have been confused by "Nu", but what was the reason for skipping over "Xi"?
:speaknoevil:
 
No clue who "Bret and Heather" are but I'm guessing that they are nothing more than talking heads with no scientific education.

You're right about animals:

A third of Ohio deer test positive for COVID-19 virus

Hippos, hyenas, and other animals are contracting COVID-19

Can your pet get COVID-19? (Yep.)

Science isn't education. It is not a university, college, grade school, degree, license, certificate, or any other sanctification.

Science is a set of falsifiable theories.

Making up numbers and using them as data is a fallacy. Argument from randU fallacy.
 
Yes, that must be the answer. You drop two people's first names like everyone should know who they are, and expect everyone else to google them.
Guess you really ARE lazy! :laugh:
You must be ashamed of them. Let me guess -- they only appear on alt-Reichwing sites.
Buzzword fallacy.
And just like that, it turns out that I am 100% correct! I would be ashamed of quoting from morons like this, too: "Weinstein has been criticized for making false statements about COVID-19 treatments and vaccines.[5][6]" or this: "Heying has said that she has taken ivermectin to guard against COVID-19 and that she and Weinstein have not been vaccinated "because we have fears [about the side-effects of the COVID-19 vaccines], as we have discussed at length on this podcast." Heying compared the use of ivermectin for this purpose to taking anti-malarial drugs.[20]" (Wikipedia)

At least Ms. Heying appears to have kept more of her marbles than Mr. Weinstein. I can see why you were reluctant to give their full names.
So you never looked at anything except the usual Wikipedia bullshit. You ARE lazy. You let Wikipedia do all your thinking for you.
 
I heard an alarming number the other day for percentage of people who have a HS diploma who read at the 4th grade level or lower.

This is not even trying, in a sense America deserves to die as we are.

Define '4th grade level or lower', since they graduated! Paradox, dude. You can see how it can't be both!
 
Yes, that must be the answer. You drop two people's first names like everyone should know who they are, and expect everyone else to google them.

You must be ashamed of them. Let me guess -- they only appear on alt-Reichwing sites.

And just like that, it turns out that I am 100% correct! I would be ashamed of quoting from morons like this, too: "Weinstein has been criticized for making false statements about COVID-19 treatments and vaccines.[5][6]" or this: "Heying has said that she has taken ivermectin to guard against COVID-19 and that she and Weinstein have not been vaccinated "because we have fears [about the side-effects of the COVID-19 vaccines], as we have discussed at length on this podcast." Heying compared the use of ivermectin for this purpose to taking anti-malarial drugs.[20]" (Wikipedia)

At least Ms. Heying appears to have kept more of her marbles than Mr. Weinstein. I can see why you were reluctant to give their full names.

You gotta stay somewhat knowledgeable and honest and chill if you want to spend time with me.

So far you are failing.
 
It gets weaker and weaker as there are less hosts to infect. It will continue to get weaker to ensure it's survival. Soon to become another common cold 'variant.'

This thing is all but over.
Too bad the scientists don't agree. As the article states, there is no guarantee the next variant will be any milder or that vaccines, already working less on Omicron, will be any more effective against it.
Agreed. The anti-vaxxers are whistling past the graveyard and rehashing the "no worse than the flu" meme.

They are rolling the dice that the next variant doesn't have a 50% mortality rate.
 
really?....that which has evolved may never evolve again?......guess that means humans didn't evolve from single celled organisms.........has anyone told the biologists yet?......

Viruses don't evolve. They are not alive.
The Theory of Evolution is not a theory of science. It's a religion. If you want to believe it, that's your business.

That said, viruses can be mutated by a host cell. If it does, that is a completely new variant. It has NOTHING to do with the original virus. It is simply a new variant of that series. For covid19, if that happens, he becomes a completely new variant of the Covid/SARS series (covid21?). Such a mutation must first:

1) survive the attacks levied by the body's defenses.
2) make it to the outside world, and survive long enough to infect another host.
3) replicate in that host and again make it outside intact.

Covid19 itself is a variant. You cannot have a variant of a variant.

Concerning Delta and Omicron:

Consider that the so-called Delta 'variant' was introduced in the news the week after Nov 15th, along with many articles describing how dangerous it was to be with your families and friends during the holidays. This 'variant' apparently occurred in a single host and was found. In the next news cycle, this single mutation somehow made it around the world infecting thousands, as if it were able to travel at supersonic speeds.

The so-called Omicron 'variant' was introduced on EXACTLY the same week one year later, along with many articles describing how dangerous it was to be with your families and friends during the holidays. This 'variant' apparently occurred in a single host and was found. In the next news cycle, this single mutation somehow made it around the world infecting thousands, as if it were able to travel at supersonic speeds.

Don't you think there's something fishy about that?

Neither of them, of course are covid19. They couldn't be.

Neither of them exist, except as pure fiction by Democrats and other liberal fear mongers of covid19.
 
Back
Top