Finally, intelligent gun regulations

Might as well give it up, toilet brush. Ain't gonna read it. :laugh:

Today, 04:15 PM
Truth Detector
Insane Level of Addiction

This message is hidden because Truth Detector is on your ignore list.

Translation: Dumb douchebag prefers to wallow in stupidity and ignorance. :clap:
 
Me neither. I do recall the idea to change annual fees and insurance. Why the conniption over doing the same for all other rights?

You can have all the rights you like as long as you pay the requisite fees, taxes and insurance. Isn't that the precedent being advocated here?

Do you have a right to live in the U.S.? Do you have to pay taxes? Aren't taxes eroding your right to live here?
 
People with an "attractive nuisance" like a backyard pool usually do pay more in homeowner's insurance premiums.

Which explains why a lot of po' folk don't have them. But we're not talking about luxuries, we're talking about rights. Unalienable rights. Human Rights.

https://www.state.gov/wp-content/up...t-of-the-Commission-on-Unalienable-Rights.pdf
PREFATORY NOTE
As the Commission’s work on this Report was nearing its completion, social convulsions shook the
United States, testifying to the nation’s unfinished work in overcoming the evil effects of its long
history of racial injustice. The many questions roiling the nation about police brutality, civic unrest,
and America’s commitment to human rights at home make all the more urgent a point we had already
stressed in the Introduction and elsewhere in this Report: The credibility of U.S. advocacy for human
rights abroad depends on the nation’s vigilance in assuring that all its own citizens enjoy fundamental
human rights.
With the eyes of the world upon her, America must show the same honest self-examination
and efforts at improvement that she expects of others. America’s dedication to unalienable rights — the
rights all human beings share — demands no less.
 
Do u think Dylan Roof or Stephen Paddock was worried about being sued?:laugh:...fucking stupid bitch

Yes, I'm sorry, but you ARE a fucking stupid bitch. Well, I'm not sure about the "fucking" part, since it's obvious no one will do that with you, Incel. lol
 
How many did Trump lose? This isn't about losing seats. This is about a massive red tsunami. Democrats brought this on because they really are that stupid.

Republicans lost 41 House seats in 2018. Is that because Republicans were stupid for electing Trump?

Define "massive."

 
Which explains why a lot of po' folk don't have them. But we're not talking about luxuries, we're talking about rights. Unalienable rights. Human Rights.

https://www.state.gov/wp-content/up...t-of-the-Commission-on-Unalienable-Rights.pdf
PREFATORY NOTE
As the Commission’s work on this Report was nearing its completion, social convulsions shook the
United States, testifying to the nation’s unfinished work in overcoming the evil effects of its long
history of racial injustice. The many questions roiling the nation about police brutality, civic unrest,
and America’s commitment to human rights at home make all the more urgent a point we had already
stressed in the Introduction and elsewhere in this Report: The credibility of U.S. advocacy for human
rights abroad depends on the nation’s vigilance in assuring that all its own citizens enjoy fundamental
human rights.
With the eyes of the world upon her, America must show the same honest self-examination
and efforts at improvement that she expects of others. America’s dedication to unalienable rights — the
rights all human beings share — demands no less.

Sorry, but guns are not an unalienable human right. They're merely something granted in the Constitution's 2nd amendment, which can be changed at any time.
 
Might as well give it up, toilet brush. Ain't gonna read it. :laugh:

Today, 04:15 PM
Truth Detector
Insane Level of Addiction

This message is hidden because Truth Detector is on your ignore list.

Tweedle Dum, without a doubt, doesn't have the keys to the outside of his "home".

5nbxx2.jpg
 
Sorry, but guns are not an unalienable human right. They're merely something granted in the Constitution's 2nd amendment, which can be changed at any time.

The right of self-defense is an unalienable right.

Exactly; Changed at anytime. Go ahead and set the precedent of denying American's their right of self-defense and watch others use that precedent to deny other rights like voting, free speech, running for office, etc. You and I won't see the final results, but your grandkids will.
 
The reasoning is that reduced access to gun means less killing. When I applied that reasoning to obesity, a serious health issue in America, reduced access to food means reduced obesity, all the genius could muster is ...this is about obesity.

and it's about denying people of color access to their 2nd amendment rights.
 
Nothing suggest failure than a slippery slope unconstitutional argument or claim.

Again, how would this make our streets safer?
:palm:

Requiring classes for concealed carry is unconstitutional as well.

Again, how would that make our streets safer?
:palm:

No court ever ruled it was unconstitutional to require classes for a concealed weapon permit. There are many stricter regulations than buying insurance which are all constitutional.

I never said it would make our streets safer. That is why I clearly said "..not that I think insurance accomplishes anything."
 
Do you have a right to live in the U.S.? Do you have to pay taxes? Aren't taxes eroding your right to live here?

Yes. Yes. No, but interesting logic. So why not charge for voting rights?

Let's be honest; you and I are among the two smartest people on this thread. We're intelligent, sane and educated adults. Yet look who won the election in 2016. Look at how close the election was in 2020.

Go ahead and charge a gun owners fee. I can afford it but what I want in return is to stop all the fucking morons and poorly educated dipshits who can't find their ass with both hands but can vote.

Shouldn't voters at least be able to able to pass a citizenship exam? Pay a fee for the liability of electing dumbasses? A small user fee to pay for the election workers and security guards. Same logic, right?
 
Yet Republicans gained two in the Senate. It was because voters were stupid for listening to the media. :palm:

In other words, Republicans had a net loss of 39 seats in Congress in 2018.

Voters did not listen to the media in 2020 because they had four years to judge his character and performance and chose to vote him out by 7 million.


My point was simply that the president's party almost always loses seats in midterms--trying to blame that on the media or voters being stupid ignores reality.
 
Back
Top