Moral Question after Latest Bombshell - Support Platner or Not?

Would you support Platner if he was Your Candidate

  • I lean Right and if Platner were running in my state as a Republican I'd support him

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    9
Who they replace Platner with is crucial.
LMAO. Millions of you people voted for Kamala and Mamdani ffs. You cried for the ayatollah.

You'd all vote for Charles Manson if he wasn't a straight white male.



Leftists: so fking dumb that Biden truly did seem mentally healthy from their POV.
 
LMAO. Millions of you people voted for Kamala and Mamdani ffs. You cried for the ayatollah.

You'd all vote for Charles Manson if he wasn't a straight white male.



Leftists: so fking dumb that Biden truly did seem mentally healthy from their POV.
Wow that's a lot of wing nut horseshit you just posted there. Your daddy trump must be so proud.
 
LMAO. Millions of you people voted for Kamala and Mamdani ffs. You cried for the ayatollah.

You'd all vote for Charles Manson if he wasn't a straight white male.



Leftists: so fking dumb that Biden truly did seem mentally healthy from their POV.
Lol and you support an adjudicated rapist, convicted felon, who is deteriorating right before our eyes.
 
Again, I replied to your comment, and all you can come up with is an off-topic, generic, sandbox insult.

You basically just surrendered like a poor sport.
Yeah that reminds me of the lawyer joke two lawyers are talking and one says the other you're lying and the other one says yeah but hear me out.
 
LMAO. Millions of you people voted for Kamala and Mamdani ffs. You cried for the ayatollah.

You'd all vote for Charles Manson if he wasn't a straight white male.



Leftists: so fking dumb that Biden truly did seem mentally healthy from their POV.
Yeah you can try ton shit on leftists all you want but you've voted for a rapist, a felon and an idiot. Go blow yourself.
 
Lol and you support an adjudicated rapist, convicted felon, who is deteriorating right before our eyes.
Oh wow.
1) Trump is not a convicted r4pist. There has never been a criminal trial, because that would require actual evidence, while none exists.
2) Theyre's a new saying in law school now, thanks to the Demonrats: "The tenth attempt at a lawfare conviction's the charm"
3) How the hell would you know about dementia? You're so dumb that Biden appeared mentally healthy by your standards. FYI Trump can do much more than just give a mediocre answer a pre-rehearsed ice-cream-cone question once a week.

In case you don't know what an ice-cream-cone question is, that's when the Secret Service clears out an ice cream shop and fills it with actors to feign interest while an Alzheimer's sufferer takes multiple attempts to answer a single question, from a friendly reporter, that he has rehearsed for all of his lucid moments up to that point in the day (which, in fairness to Joe, was never more than 5).
 
Oh wow.
1) Trump is not a convicted r4pist. There has never been a criminal trial, because that would require actual evidence, while none exists.
2) Theyre's a new saying in law school now, thanks to the Demonrats: "The tenth attempt at a lawfare conviction's the charm"
3) How the hell would you know about dementia? You're so dumb that Biden appeared mentally healthy by your standards. FYI Trump can do much more than just give a mediocre answer a pre-rehearsed ice-cream-cone question once a week.

In case you don't know what an ice-cream-cone question is, that's when the Secret Service clears out an ice cream shop and fills it with actors to feign interest while an Alzheimer's sufferer takes multiple attempts to answer a single question, from a friendly reporter, that he has rehearsed for all of his lucid moments up to that point in the day (which, in fairness to Joe, was never more than 5).
I stopped at your first sentence. I did not say convicted did I. I said adjudicated.

I didn’t read the rest of you word salad.
 
Yeah that reminds me of the lawyer joke two lawyers are talking and one says the other you're lying and the other one says yeah but hear me out.
You just heard that one today and really hoped that it would make sense here, but for some strange reason, it landed like all your other posts.
 
Oh wow.
1) Trump is not a convicted r4pist. ...
A jury sat and heard all the evidence and made a finding that Trump had raped E Jean.

Now you can argue that by saying 'they could not find rape as they did not know for sure whether he used his penis and finger and thus they had to say 'sexual assault' via NYS statute' if you think that is a big win for Trump, but the Judge later made it clear when Trump tried to sue E Jean for saying he 'raped her' that the 'sexual assault' finding 'is indistinguishable from a 'rape finding' and in most States and the Federally Trump would have been found to have raped her as they did not have the outdated statute NYS did. Which is now fixed and also would call what Trump did, rape, if adjudicated today.
 
Back
Top