The most secure election ever and other lies.

[Into the Night]

No matter how you slice it, sworn affidavits are only what people think they saw.

"People" thought they saw secret suitcases of Biden ballots. It was investigated and it turned out to be normal storage bins for ballots and legal ballots.

Again, you are hanging your hat on 50/50 situations because it's all you have.

One of your favorite sworn affidavits is that of Jesse Richard Morgan.

Did you ever follow up to see how that turned out? I assume not.

The Investigation and Findings

• • Official Findings: A joint federal investigation by the USPS Office of Inspector General (OIG), the U.S. Postal Inspection Service, and the FBI reviewed transportation logs and interviewed more than 20 witnesses. [1]
  • Contradictions: Investigators found that Morgan used roughly six different trailers during October 2020 and did not use the specific serial-numbered trailer he claimed had gone missing on the date in question. [1]
  • Data Limits: Transport databases showed his actual cargo contained a standard, much smaller quantity of regular mail items rather than the massive volume of phantom ballots alleged.
  https://www.uspsoig.gov/sites/default/files/reports/2023-01/21INV00781.pdf

Trivial fallacy. Strawman fallacy. Argument of the Stone fallacy.
Suitcases are not valid bins. They were not legal ballots. This counting office broke the law.
You can't make any evidence just disappear, Void.

 

[Into the Night]

I read it completely once and parts multiple times.

Lie. Denial. You discarded it.

I also watch a YouTube video of an interview with him where he tells the story, again.

Lie. Synthesis. Youtube is not an affidavit.

The Investigation and Findings

An affidavit is not an investigation. Strawman fallacy.

• • Official Findings: A joint federal investigation by the USPS Office of Inspector General (OIG), the U.S. Postal Inspection Service, and the FBI reviewed transportation logs and interviewed more than 20 witnesses. [1]
  • Contradictions: Investigators found that Morgan used roughly six different trailers during October 2020 and did not use the specific serial-numbered trailer he claimed had gone missing on the date in question. [1]
  • Data Limits: Transport databases showed his actual cargo contained a standard, much smaller quantity of regular mail items rather than the massive volume of phantom ballots alleged.

https://www.uspsoig.gov/sites/default/files/reports/2023-01/21INV00781.pdf

Irrelevance fallacy.

...deleted image...

Assumption of victory fallacy.

 

[Into the Night]

But still fixed in 2024. Did you know that "fixed" and "revealed" mean different things in the English language?

That's literally what I said in the post you responded to.

"It was found out in 2024 and fixed in 2024. The governor hid it for 2 years."

Are you really dumb or really dishonest? I'm fine with either. I just want to know what I'm dealing with.

Not fixed, Void.

 

[Into the Night]

What evidence would you personally expect to see?

RQAA

First, I'm not a Democrat. I'm not registered as D or R.

You are a Democrat.

Second, yes, it should have been revealed sooner but it was also the new governor, a DEMOCRAT, who revealed it AND criticized the previous governor for hiding it.

Lie. Synthesis.

No, actually the first step in fixing is, by definition, the actual fixing.

It was not fixed.
You cannot fix what you cannot identify.

 

[Into the Night]

There weren't hundreds. There may have been half a dozen.

You realize that Georgia, under REPUBLICAN Brad Raffensperger, investigated every accusation of ballot harvesting and found nothing, right?

Trivial fallacy.
Argument from randU fallacy.
Lie. Denial.
Denial of history (revisionism).

 

[Into the Night]

You intentionally passed over your favorite ghost story - James Morgan (or what this name was) and the mystery of the vanishing trailer/ballots.

That was sworn affidavit. That was investigated by multiple federal agencies, including the FBI, and nothing was found.

Lie. Denial.

The reason you ignored it is because, once you acknowledge it, and the investigation, you have to either a) admit that it was all a tall tail and he didn't see what he claimed to see or b) start painting an eleborate conspiracy theory about the government's investigation.

The Democrat party is a conspiracy. It is no theory. False dichotomy fallacy.

It quit too if I were you.

Assumption of victory fallacy.

 

[Into the Night]

Link?

Link?

RQAA

 

[IBDaMann]

I read it completely once and parts multiple times.

Nope. I recall you insisting multiple times that you had read what I posted, all the while discussing some completely different event. You kept, and keep, referencing articles, YouTube videos and other subjective political commentary from your echo chamber instructing you on what to believe, commentary that is everything but the one sworn affidavit in question, and you remain steadfast in your OBEDIENCE to the DNC.

 

[ZenMode]

RQAA

Nope. I recall you insisting multiple times that you had read what I posted, all the while discussing some completely different event. You kept, and keep, referencing articles, YouTube videos and other subjective political commentary from your echo chamber instructing you on what to believe, commentary that is everything but the one sworn affidavit in question, and you remain steadfast in your OBEDIENCE to the DNC.

Yah, any way, it was investigated by multiple federal agencies and, not surprisingly, they found nothing.

Same with eye witness/affidavit signer Melissa Carone.

Out of curiosity, does it matter to you that what you believe is accurate?

 

[IBDaMann]

Yah, any way,

That's what I thought. So we're done.

[something unrelated] was investigated by multiple federal agencies

Why the sudden pivot to irrelevant trivia?

and, not surprisingly, [fictitious investigators of a fictitious event] found nothing.

Are you expecting producers to bid on the movie rights?

 

[ZenMode]

That's what I thought. So we're done.


Why the sudden pivot to irrelevant trivia?


Are you expecting producers to bid on the movie rights?

Sworn affidavits are constantly shown to be wrong.

Sworn affidavits are all you have.

Everything else you throw out is a distraction.

Do you care if what you believe is accurate?

 

[Into the Night]

Yah, any way, it was investigated by multiple federal agencies and, not surprisingly, they found nothing.

Void reference fallacy.
You can't make any evidence just disappear, Void
You are conflicting yourself again.

Same with eye witness/affidavit signer Melissa Carone.

Out of curiosity, does it matter to you that what you believe is accurate?

You can't make any evidence just disappear, Void.

 

[Into the Night]

Sworn affidavits are constantly shown to be wrong.

Bulverism fallacy.

Sworn affidavits are all you have.

Lie. Denial. Argument of the Stone fallacy.

Everything else you throw out is a distraction.

Inversion fallacy.

Do you care if what you believe is accurate?

You can't make any evidence just disappear, Void.

 

[IBDaMann]

Sworn affidavits are constantly shown to be wrong.

Give me a real example, i.e. post an actual affidavit recounting the 2020 election steal and let's discuss it. Until then, your assertion is dismissed.

Sworn affidavits are all you have.

I have mountainous eyewitness testimony and incontrovertible empirical evidence.

You have "Nuh-uhhh."

I also have my own observations, and those trump all of your cumulative dishonesty.

 

[ZenMode]

Give me a real example, i.e. post an actual affidavit recounting the 2020 election steal and let's discuss it. Until then, your assertion is dismissed.

I used the example that you have provided me, long ago, as an example. The Jesse Morgan story.

Other than the fact that it's been debunked, what makes that one suddenly unacceptable?

I've also provided the Melissa Carone sworn affidavit that was debunked in real time in the Michigan legislature.

There's also the two women in Georgia that were accused of illegal activity, by Rudy Giuliani, that was debunked, they sued him and won because he couldn't prove his claims.

I have mountainous eyewitness testimony and incontrovertible empirical evidence.

So, you provide me some examples of eye witness, sworn affidavits that haven been investigated and found to be legitimate.

You have "Nuh-uhhh."

I have examples of sworn testimony that were investigated and proved to be wrong.

I also have my own observations, and those trump all of your cumulative dishonesty.

What have you personally observed and where are the sworn affidavits for those observations?

 

[ZenMode]

Bulverism fallacy.

RQAA.

Lie. Denial. Argument of the Stone fallacy.

RQAA.

Inversion fallacy.

RQAA.

You can't make any evidence just disappear, Void.

RQAA.

Keep up or get out of the way.

 

[ZenMode]

You can't make any evidence just disappear, Void.

RQAA.

 

[IBDaMann]

I used the example that you have provided me,

Nope. You are using your delusional fabrication of testimony that was not given for an event that never occurred.

Other than the fact that it's been debunked,

Your omniscience fallacies carry no weight, especially when you are declaring that your fabrications have somehow been "debunked". What does that even mean?

what makes that one suddenly unacceptable?

So post the actual affidavit, right here in this thread.

I've also provided the Melissa Carone sworn affidavit

Look around, you did not post the Melissa Carone affidavit either. Post them both here in this thread.

 

[ZenMode]

Nope. You are using your delusional fabrication of testimony that was not given for an event that never occurred.

Then why did you post about it 2 years ago?

Post in thread 'REDUX: How Election Fraud Is Conducted By The Democrat/RINO (Uni)Party'

Jun 11, 2024

His own testimony was that he returned the ballots, if that's even what they were, to the spot where he picked them up. He has no idea where "they" went

You are a liar. Everything you post is an absolute lie that you pull out of your azz.

Jesse Richard Morgan saw the mail-in ballots. He had quite an odyssey in Pennsylvania, arriving at Lancaster. His truck was taken by someone else after he parked it for the night, and driven along a 25-mile route where the truck was stopped and parked eleven times.

• IBDaMann

Your omniscience fallacies carry no weight, especially when you are declaring that your fabrications have somehow been "debunked". What does that even mean?

They aren't my fabrications. They're affidavits that you provided to support your claims of a stolen election, they have been investigated and proved to be inaccurate.

So post the actual affidavit, right here in this thread.

Not sure why I'm posting the affidavit that YOU originally brought up, but ok.

https://www.pacourts.us/Storage/media/pdfs/20210603/212420-file-10836.pdf

Look around, you did not post the Melissa Carone affidavit either. Post them both here in this thread.

No. She was actually given a hearing in Michigan. She was given a chance to present her case. No reason to post her affidavit when you can hear it from her mouth.

View: https://youtu.be/7SnVvq_Aplk?si=IRNLjdnuxcZWXAoV

 

[Into the Night]

RQAA.

RQAA.

RQAA.

RQAA.

Keep up or get out of the way.

YARP