AI Conscious?

RQAA. Answer the questions put to you.

Jesus Christ and God's existence is not important? The parable of the talents is meaningless?
Oh? You think the dietary laws and various other laws of each of these cultures is unimportant?
you first, bitch.

you cannot understand basic words.

what does 'sum of the law and the prophets' mean to you?

you're a fraud and an imbecile.
 
So why do you laugh when I point out that there is no evidence for the soul?

Genuinely curious. Also, nota bene, that when I say I've done the study that is informal. I'm not writing a fucking science paper (I'm already published in actual science journals in actual physical science), so let's drop that silliness.

But a lifetime of observation leads me to easily FAIL TO REJECT THE NULL HYPOTHESIS that there is no soul.


No explain why you think it is funny to doubt a soul when you, yourself, are an atheist.
Sounds to be that you are so full of shit that you do not have room for a soul.
 
Sounds to be that you are so full of shit that you do not have room for a soul.

Do you honestly think there's a non-zero chance that I have an invisible unicorn living in my home?

Please tell me you don't believe that.

If you don't believe me, however, you will be going against your own position so I am waiting with baited breath to see how you square this circle.
 
Do you honestly think there's a non-zero chance that I have an invisible unicorn living in my home?

I have no idea of what "invisible" things live in your home. AND NEITHER DO YOU.

Please tell me you don't believe that.

I do not "believe" anything. If I am making a blind guess about something...I call it a guess; if I am making an informed guess about something...I call it a guess; if I am supposing something...I call it a supposition; if I am making a conjecture or hypothesis about something...I call them conjectures or suppositions. I do not hide those kinds of things with the word "believe" in any of its forms.

So I AM telling you that I don't believe that.
If you don't believe me, however, you will be going against your own position so I am waiting with baited breath to see how you square this circle.
Wait underwater without a breathing devise if you want.

I am telling you that I do not "believe" that.
 
OK. So you live your life like a paranoid schizophrenic.

No I do not. But you live your life like a jerkoff.

Invisible beings are PROBABLY in the traffic lights....you better say some nice things to them when you are outside.
I have no idea if any invisible beings exist or not. NEITHER DO YOU. If things are invisible...THEY ARE NOT VISIBLE. And they may not be detectable in any other way. I have no problem with you blindly guessing there are no invisible things.

I wonder if you are correct...or if you are, as I said earlier, just full of shit.
 
No I do not. But you live your life like a jerkoff.

The man who thinks there's at least a 50/50 chance (he can't say) that invisible beings are controlling the weather from the traffic lights doesn't live like paranoid schizophrenic?

Intersting.

I have no idea if any invisible beings exist or not.

Do these "invisible beings" control your life?

NEITHER DO YOU. If things are invisible...THEY ARE NOT VISIBLE.

electrons are invisible. I can show you the evidence that they exist.

And they may not be detectable in any other way. I have no problem with you blindly guessing there are no invisible things.

I wonder if you are correct...or if you are, as I said earlier, just full of shit.

Please, hit up the Thorazine and take the caps lock off.
 
The man who thinks there's at least a 50/50 chance (he can't say) that invisible beings are controlling the weather from the traffic lights doesn't live like paranoid schizophrenic?

Intersting.

It might be. But I have never said it is 50/50. I have no idea of what the odds are.
Do these "invisible beings" control your life?

What invisible beings are you referring to? The one's you blindly guess do not exist? Or something else?
electrons are invisible. I can show you the evidence that they exist.

Okay. So what. Are you saying the only things that exist are thing that can be detected (evidenced) by humans...the currently visible senior beings on planet Earth, a speck of dust circling a fairly nondescript star in a fairly nondescript galaxy among trillions of other galaxies in the part of the universe known to those humans?

Is that what you are saying, because that is what I can reasonably infer from what you are arguing...and anyone with a functioning brain can tell that is an absurdity.

Please, hit up the Thorazine and take the caps lock off.
Son...you ought to quit while you are only far behind.

I doubt you will. So I thank you for that.
 
It might be. But I have never said it is 50/50. I have no idea of what the odds are.


What invisible beings are you referring to? The one's you blindly guess do not exist? Or something else?


Okay. So what. Are you saying the only things that exist are thing that can be detected (evidenced) by humans...the currently visible senior beings on planet Earth, a speck of dust circling a fairly nondescript star in a fairly nondescript galaxy among trillions of other galaxies in the part of the universe known to those humans?

Is that what you are saying, because that is what I can reasonably infer from what you are arguing...and anyone with a functioning brain can tell that is an absurdity.


Son...you ought to quit while you are only far behind.

I doubt you will. So I thank you for that.
You are just a sceptic. That accomplishes nothing.
 
It might be. But I have never said it is 50/50. I have no idea of what the odds are.


What invisible beings are you referring to? The one's you blindly guess do not exist? Or something else?


Okay. So what. Are you saying the only things that exist are thing that can be detected (evidenced) by humans...the currently visible senior beings on planet Earth, a speck of dust circling a fairly nondescript star in a fairly nondescript galaxy among trillions of other galaxies in the part of the universe known to those humans?

Is that what you are saying, because that is what I can reasonably infer from what you are arguing...and anyone with a functioning brain can tell that is an absurdity.


Son...you ought to quit while you are only far behind.

I doubt you will. So I thank you for that.

Are you in any way familiar with MATHEMATICS? (That's the one with NUMBERS, not the letters)

In mathematics there are estimations which allow one to make solid decisions even when it isn't exactly 100% known perfectly. Take for instance something called an "infinite series" which, per the name, is infinite. It cannot be wholly solved. BUT many of these infinite series CONVERGE on a value.

Take Pi as another example. You can't possibly know pi to all its digits (it's infinite) so I guess you can never calculate the area of a circle. You can never calculate....well about 1/3 of any given equation in physics. You simply don't know anything about circles because you can't know pi perfectly

Look at CALCULUS (that's the class your smarter friends in high school took while you were over in shop algebra). There's a "Lim" function which provides a value for a function as it APPROACHES some input value.

There are also countless shortcuts or estimators in math which serve perfectly well to come to SOLID DISCRETE SOLUTIONS even when all the data is less than 100% known.

Even in INFERENTIAL STATISTICS (google that so you'll understand) scientists allow products to go out on the market as effective treatments for, say, illnesses, after they have tested it and "rejected the null hypothesis" that the drug didn't have any effect. Again, the data is NEVER perfect.

ALL OF THIS IS DENIED TO YOU because you are some sort of zealot for perfected knowledge.


Like I said, let me know when you make it past the Hume module in your online philosophy-for-morons class and we can further discuss.
 
Back
Top