A woman needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle.

Jarod, you obviously don't have to reply to this but I am curious this idea that she simply said women should have equal rights and that was essentially it.
Jarod, you obviously don't have to reply to this but I am curious this idea that she simply said women should have equal rights and that was essentially it.
I think that was the general gist of her life message. How can you say otherwise?
 
I think that was the general gist of her life message. How can you say otherwise?
The general gist of libertarianism is individual freedom. Pretty hard to be against that right?

But that principle can include specific positions or policies that people disagree with.
 
How many women go off totally on their own and live off the land throughout history?

7b286ac50d631f87ee8e7d04fe22b992.jpg
 
The general gist of libertarianism is individual freedom. Pretty hard to be against that right?

But that principle can include specific positions or policies that people disagree with.
If you are a libertarian You should love her. But I find that most libertarians pick and chose, they don't stay consistent with the ideology.

I think on issues of women's rights, she simply argued a woman should be free to do anything a man is allowed to do and should feel free, if she choses, to exercise that right without societal pressure to do differently.

Seems some here are very strongly opposed.
 
How many women go off totally on their own and live off the land throughout history?

7b286ac50d631f87ee8e7d04fe22b992.jpg
This is not history, this is in our current society where physical strength is less of a factor. HIstory has examples, Helen of Troy (fictional) and Joan of Arc, and Annie Oakley, and Emilia Earhart.
 
This is not history, this is in our current society where physical strength is less of a factor. HIstory has examples, Helen of Troy (fictional) and Joan of Arc, and Annie Oakley, and Emilia Earhart.

Did a fictional character, Joan of Arc, Annie Oakley, or Amelia Earhart "go off totally on their own and live off the land", Brad?
 
If you are a libertarian You should love her. But I find that most libertarians pick and chose, they don't stay consistent with the ideology.

I think on issues of women's rights, she simply argued a woman should be free to do anything a man is allowed to do and should feel free, if she choses, to exercise that right without societal pressure to do differently.

Seems some here are very strongly opposed.
Libertarians believe in the principle of individual freedom. Do you believe in it? If you do, that should mean you agree with all the policies they support right? Because that’s the argument you’re making here.
 
Libertarians believe in the principle of individual freedom. Do you believe in it? If you do, that should mean you agree with all the policies they support right? Because that’s the argument you’re making here.
I think you are correct. I do not really consider myself a full libertarian, because I do believe in things like child labor laws, and that taxes are necessary to have a Country, and some would say that my agreement to limitations on large corporations is not libertarian, but I think socially I am about as libertarian as it gets. The exceptions are that I believe in limits on gun ownership and I agree with some hate crimes laws.
 
Last edited:
I think you are correct.
I believe that one can believe in the principle of individual freedom and not have to agree with all that Libertarians believe.

Just as I believe one can believe in equal rights for women, such as women not needing their husbands to get a loan, while not agreeing with all that Steinem stood for.

Nor do I believe she simply stood for equal rights. She stood for much more and she had every right to support what she did, but what she believed wasn't above push back.
 
Do you consider yourself a libertarian? If so, can you explain your disagreement with her?
No, I consider myself a Centrist and a Realist. I want what works. I don't believe you can change basic human nature, only work with it. That means what Steinem advocated was mostly, if not entirely, wrong.
 
Back
Top