A woman needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle.

I believe that one can believe in the principle of individual freedom and not have to agree with all that Libertarians believe.

Just as I believe one can believe in equal rights for women, such as women not needing their husbands to get a loan, while not agreeing with all that Steinem stood for.

Nor do I believe she simply stood for equal rights. She stood for much more and she had every right to support what she did, but what she believed wasn't above push back.
What did she stand for beyond equal rights?
 
If you are a libertarian You should love her.

ROFL

But I find that most libertarians pick and chose, they don't stay consistent with the ideology.

"Their" ideology as dictated by you.

I think on issues of women's rights, she simply argued a woman should be free to do anything a man is allowed to do and should feel free, if she choses, to exercise that right without societal pressure to do differently.

That isn't the issue. Her deep and abiding love in life was killing babies. But when she wasn't demanding babies be slaughtered, she disparaged and degraded women who failed to bow to her radical ideology.


Seems some here are very strongly opposed.

To radical leftism? Most who post here are strongly opposed to what you and the dutch socks promote.
 
ROFL



"Their" ideology as dictated by you.



That isn't the issue. Her deep and abiding love in life was killing babies. But when she wasn't demanding babies be slaughtered, she disparaged and degraded women who failed to bow to her radical ideology.




To radical leftism? Most who post here are strongly opposed to what you and the dutch socks promote.
You are citing an opinion piece as fact?
 
I think you are correct. I do not really consider myself a full libertarian, because I do believe in things like child labor laws, and that taxes are necessary to have a Country,
Where do you get the idea that "libertarians" oppose child labor laws? Is communist China "libertarian?" Is Sudan?


and some would say that my agreement to limitations on large corporations is not libertarian, but I think socially I am about as libertarian as it gets. The exceptions are that I believe in limits on gun ownership and I agree with some hate crimes laws.

So you oppose individual liberty and support restrictions on free speech. We know from the Stop Nick Shirley debate that you oppose freedom of the press as well.

But you're socially "libertarian" because stating the truth that you're an authoritarian doesn't sound as cool?
 
ROFL



"Their" ideology as dictated by you.



That isn't the issue. Her deep and abiding love in life was killing babies. But when she wasn't demanding babies be slaughtered, she disparaged and degraded women who failed to bow to her radical ideology.




To radical leftism? Most who post here are strongly opposed to what you and the dutch socks promote.
What is it that we promote?
 
How did she promote that idea?
Asked and answered.

What do you not grasp.

Let's repeat from another source;

{
Steinem remains committed to destroying women, motherhood and thereby the traditional family. Steinem has succeeded beyond even her own expectations.

Twelve years ago Jacqueline Kirby, M.S. in Single-parent Families in Poverty wrote:

One of the most striking changes in family structure over the last twenty years has been the increase in single-parent families. In 1970, the number of single-parent families with children under the age of 18 was 3.8 million. By 1990, the number had more than doubled to 9.7 million. For the first time in history, children are more likely to reside in a single-parent family for reasons other than the death of a parent. One in four children are born to an unmarried mother, many of whom are teenagers. Another 40 percent of children under 18 will experience parental breakup.

Ninety percent of single-parent families are headed by females. Not surprisingly, single mothers with dependent children have the highest rate of poverty across all demographic groups (Olson & Banyard, 1993). Approximately 60 percent of U.S. children living in mother-only families are impoverished, compared with only 11 percent of two-parent families. The rate of poverty is even higher in African-American single-parent families, in which two out of every three children are poor.}

 
Asked and answered.

What do you not grasp.

Let's repeat from another source;

{
Steinem remains committed to destroying women, motherhood and thereby the traditional family. Steinem has succeeded beyond even her own expectations.

Twelve years ago Jacqueline Kirby, M.S. in Single-parent Families in Poverty wrote:



Jarod doesnt grasp anything.
 
A smart man needs a leftist woman like he needs a hole in his wallet. The best leftist women ,...which isn't saying much,...are those born mute.
 
BTW,....what do you call a woman who has three kids from three different men? Fucked. :cool:She might as well push all her chips in right now because her life is pretty much TOAST. The odds of her ever finding a man of even half way decent quality are slim and none,...and THAT's no joke.

Well,...maybe she could get this guy.... :ROFLMAO:

 
Last edited:
Back
Top