ou were never in grad school, Hugo. Your own illiteracy has already demonstrated it.You were never in grad school, Hugo. Your own illiteracy has already demonstrated it.
ou were never in grad school, Hugo. Your own illiteracy has already demonstrated it.You were never in grad school, Hugo. Your own illiteracy has already demonstrated it.
Tired old bullshit. You are artful at avoiding questions I'll give you that. Must be that liberal arts "education" you got.Yet people support Trump, who is nothing if not the cause of destruction.
Science is not a study.Science is not a study.
Science does not use consensus.
Science is not a community.
He's trying to call a TV show 'science'.
Science is not a community.Right, only fringe in the sense It's conclusions have not been widely accepted in the scientific community.
The Libet study seems to be from 1983, which is ancient by the standards of neuroscience.
An subconscious electrochemical signal four milliseconds before someone lifts an arm does not disprove we have veto power or the agency of deliberation
Hume is an intellectual powerhouse dont you know that?You were never in grad school, Hugo. Your own illiteracy has already demonstrated it.
Science is not a study.Science is not a community.
Science has no age.
This part is correct.
Void argument fallacy. TDS, Hugo.Yet people support Trump, who is nothing if not the cause of destruction.
Void argument fallacy. TDS, Hugo.
Void argument fallacy. TDS, Hugo.Yet people support Trump, who is nothing if not the cause of destruction.
Ooo. Nice shot Hume! I'll give you that one!So, Libet had no free will to do the experiment? The contradictions are enormous.
oo. Nice shot Hume! I'll give you that one!Ooo. Nice shot Hume! I'll give you that one!
A TV show is not science, Murphy. It is not a proof anything either.Watch the video if you find it fringe. Nova is hardly a fringe outfit
A TV show is not science, Murphy. It is not a proof anything either.A TV show is not science, Murphy. It is not a proof anything either.
Nova has often brought up fringe theories as 'science'.
It's a TV show, Murphy.
...and your point...?There are also split brain experiments which point to the brain’s ability to create a post hop justification of decisions. Read “Who’s in Charge” by Gazzanigga
No science here...move along...move along...Especially when you ignore the science
...and your point...?...and your point...?
Which is not a theory of science. It is a subjective opinion only.It's getting ridiculous how often you name drop people you've never read, and misrepresent what they believe.
"Renowned neuroscientist Michael S. Gazzaniga argues that while the physical brain is completely automatic and governed by deterministic laws, personal responsibility and freedom still exist as real concepts at the social level." [1]
Science is not a TV show.Hey I can’t care less if this interests you. I find it amazingly interesting.
I like science.
A TV show is not science.Hey make of it what you will. I understand it is scary and you are more into philosophy masturbation than science. That’s cool
Science is not a TV show, Murphy.And you are clearly dumb in some areas. Maybe science is not your strong suit
Didnt they say the science was over about climate change?Science is not a study.
Science does not use consensus.
Science is not a community.
He's trying to call a TV show 'science'.