Being human is hard, this pair of psychologists say. Could accepting we don’t have free will make it easier?

Science is not a study.
Science does not use consensus.
Science is not a community.

He's trying to call a TV show 'science'.
Science is not a study.
Science does not use consensus.
Science is not a community.

He's trying to call a TV show 'science'.
 
Right, only fringe in the sense It's conclusions have not been widely accepted in the scientific community.

The Libet study seems to be from 1983, which is ancient by the standards of neuroscience.
Science is not a community.
Science has no age.
An subconscious electrochemical signal four milliseconds before someone lifts an arm does not disprove we have veto power or the agency of deliberation

This part is correct.
 
A TV show is not science, Murphy. It is not a proof anything either.
Nova has often brought up fringe theories as 'science'.

It's a TV show, Murphy.
A TV show is not science, Murphy. It is not a proof anything either.
Nova has often brought up fringe theories as 'science'.

It's a TV show, Murphy.
 
It's getting ridiculous how often you name drop people you've never read, and misrepresent what they believe.

"Renowned neuroscientist Michael S. Gazzaniga argues that while the physical brain is completely automatic and governed by deterministic laws, personal responsibility and freedom still exist as real concepts at the social level." [1]​
Which is not a theory of science. It is a subjective opinion only.
 
Back
Top