Moral relativism

Start at the beginning and list off every possible scenario. I will tell you in which ones it will be beneficial and in which ones it will be detrimental.
As far as a child's social and cognitive development is concerned, do you believe that hitting them with boards is beneficial or detrimental?
 
Too oversimplified. Everything depends on everything. Start listing.
How is it oversimplified? Corporal punishment has consistently been linked to aggression toward others, low self-esteem, depression, criminal behavior later in life and anti-social behavior in geneal, not to mention that it's, again, ADULTS hitting CHILDREN with boards and exposing them to incredible pain and public humiliation.

Does that sound moral?
 
Why do you care about clitorectomies? Is that really the number one moral issue you are concerned about?
It's a good example for discussing morality because it's a common practice, involves children and is absolutely terrible.
 
How is it oversimplified?
Stupid question.

Corporal punishment has consistently been linked to aggression toward others, low self-esteem, depression, criminal behavior later in life and anti-social behavior in geneal,
Anything can be "linked" to anything else. I can "link" you to a distant galaxy.

not to mention that it's, again, ADULTS hitting CHILDREN with boards
... who find the practice moral because of the positive results without any fabricated "linking".

and exposing them to incredible pain and public humiliation.
Your attempts to hyper-oversimplify are summarily rejected.

Does that sound moral?
Let's see, "linking" combined with gross oversimplification ... and declaring it universal when it isn't ... does not sound moral.
 
... who find the practice moral because of the positive results without any fabricated "linking".
"Finding" an immoral act to be moral doesn't make it moral. It is still adults hitting children with boards.

It's odd that you are debating the morality of adults hitting children with boards, but here we are....
 
Back
Top