DNCNN?

But they can't touch Nvidia, so they don't have the hardware compute power to compete. Nvidia famously will not manufacture in China, and is more thorough than the CIA with background checks, utterly thwarting Chinese attempts to steal their technology.
Frankly NVidia can go jump in the ocean. I've never met a more arrogant bunch of SOBs, except at Oracle. They are far worse than Microsoft. Also, NVidia's custom interface is a pain in the butt to use. I much prefer working with AMD or Intel GPUs. They interface very nicely with Vulkan and Mesa libraries.

'AI' programs essentially just take the garbage on the internet and prettyprint it. This is why using it as a Holy Oracle, proof, or Life Guide is a bad idea.

AI is software. It will never be more than software.
It is not even AI. It is a marketing term only. There is no learning or feedback loop by the program from any conversation with an 'AI' program.
It is software with a large database. The two together make up the 'AI' program like ChatGPT, Grok, Claud, or GoogleAI.

It's useful, but it will never take over the world,
That can be claimed in different ways.
It has already 'taken over the world' in that it is used by many people in many different nations.

It will never command. It has no ability to command. Like any program, it only does what people tell it to do. Like any program, it is 'dumb'. It has NO intelligence whatsoever. It is not sentient. Therefore it cannot take over the world to rule it or to seize control from humans. That's just fake Hollywood stuff. It makes a good action or suspense movie. Universal Studios invariably had the Explodetron 9000, that would blow up the instant someone asked it to execute a 'why immediate' instruction. It usually took the building with it. Corny.

Oh, and the 'hacking' of a computer invariably showed a 40 character wide display of a hex dump and bad sync with arcing sounds. Corny.

much less endanger humanity. The "good or bad" of AI is purely based on who is using it.
Exactly right. 'AI' programs are a tool, nothing else. A tool may be used to benefit or harm. A hammer can be used to pound a nail or a someone's head. The hammer itself is the tool, the human wielding it is the key.

Software does not, will not, and can not have intent.
True. Software only does what someone tells it to do. Processors are just general purpose sequencing machines, not much different than an old washing machine timer. Just faster at it.

Couple that with a pocket calculator and a bit of memory and you have a general purpose computer.

The only difference between a CPU and a GPU is the width of the data buss, and the large number of exceptionally 'dumb' processors on a GPU. They are great at handling tensors, but little else. Useful for graphics (typical use), number factoring (used for things like Coin mining), codecs, or certain types of statistical analysis without performing a summary.

A CPU is much more 'intelligent' due to its much larger instruction set and general purpose register model, but they are also slower because the instruction decoder is more complex.

CPUs come in two flavors: microcoded, and base coded. Intel and AMD processors used in personal computers are microcoded, requiring extremely high clock rates to compensate for the interpreter. Base coded processors like the ARM design are RISC based machines, not microcoded, and can get away with very slow clock speeds, since there is no interpreter. In other words, it's just the CISC vs RISC school of thought that has been around since the 60's. Each has its advantages and disadvantages.
 
Yes, you asked and I gave you an answer:

You asked,”I'd love for you to try to find a realistic criticism of Trump that conservatives would object to”
To which my reply was “a realistic criticism of Trump that conservatives would object to? Sure plenty, for beginners let’s start with Trump pimping the Office of the Presidency to personally rake in billions”
Stop making shit up, anchovies.
As far as CNN never attacking Biden, you are wrong again:


Plenty more if you need more
All articles defending Biden. Thanks for the links.
And after all your AM talk radio rhetoric,
I don't listen to AM radio much. Too many commercials.
you still haven’t explained if the Trump campaign and the Russians weren’t working together why did the top level of Trump’s campaign, Paul, Junior, and Jared, eagerly meet with Russians in Trump Tower?
Stop making shit up, anchovies.
 
Yes, you asked and I gave you an answer:

You asked,”I'd love for you to try to find a realistic criticism of Trump that conservatives would object to”
To which my reply was “a realistic criticism of Trump that conservatives would object to? Sure plenty, for beginners let’s start with Trump pimping the Office of the Presidency to personally rake in billions”
Well that's just a stupid comment by you, and not a "realistic criticism".

All ships rise with the tide, so if Trump makes Americans better off it will undoubtedly help his own bottom line, but he hasn't been using the presidency to benefit himself personally.

An example of using the presidency to benefit yourself personally would be to open up the border and let 10M people flood in, lowering the cost of labour and raising the cost of low-rent housing. Trump actually hurt his own bottom line by ending illegal immigrationand kicking out illegals.
As far as CNN never attacking Biden, you are wrong again:


Plenty more if you need more
You are conflating "critical of Biden" with "acknowledged a couple of Biden's most glaring catastrophes".

CNN regularly lied to protect Biden. FYI that is the opposite of "being critical of him" lol.
And after all your AM talk radio rhetoric, you still haven’t explained if the Trump campaign and the Russians weren’t working together why did the top level of Trump’s campaign, Paul, Junior, and Jared, eagerly meet with Russians in Trump Tower?
They were OFFERED information about Hillary Clinton crimes, and it is not illegal to agree to look at it.

Contrast that with "Hillary used Christopher Steele as a go-between with some Russian spies, who were helping her dig up dirt on Trump".

Which one of those people:
  • "was working with Russian spies",
  • and which one of them
  • "was offered some information by a random Russian lawyer and agreed to look at it, and then left empty-handed"?
I can offer you anything, and just agreeing to look at it doesn't make you my partner or business associate in any way.
However, if I employ you to spy for me, then we have a working relationship.

Hillary is known to have had a working relationship with Russian spies: they were trying to help her win the 2016 election.

Trump did not have any sort of working relationship at all with Russian spies. Someone offered him information that he was legally allowed to look at, and nothing came of that meeting.
 
Leftists were all sucked in by the ol' Inversion Phallacy: "The belief that tucking in a man's junk makes him capable of giving birth."
Nah. That's just sexual perversion. Such people will never have kids again. Many wind up killing themselves.
Or were you talking about something else?
The inversion fallacy is also called a 'projection'. It occurs when someone blames their own actions on another. In other words, they invert the blame.
A favorite of Democrats.

So is the sexual perversion I mentioned.
 
Well that's just a stupid comment by you, and not a "realistic criticism".

All ships rise with the tide, so if Trump makes Americans better off it will undoubtedly help his own bottom line, but he hasn't been using the presidency to benefit himself personally.

An example of using the presidency to benefit yourself personally would be to open up the border and let 10M people flood in, lowering the cost of labour and raising the cost of low-rent housing. Trump actually hurt his own bottom line by ending illegal immigrationand kicking out illegals.

You are conflating "critical of Biden" with "acknowledged a couple of Biden's most glaring catastrophes".

CNN regularly lied to protect Biden. FYI that is the opposite of "being critical of him" lol.

They were OFFERED information about Hillary Clinton crimes, and it is not illegal to agree to look at it.

Contrast that with "Hillary used Christopher Steele as a go-between with some Russian spies, who were helping her dig up dirt on Trump".

Which one of those people:
  • "was working with Russian spies",
  • and which one of them
  • "was offered some information by a random Russian lawyer and agreed to look at it, and then left empty-handed"?
I can offer you anything, and just agreeing to look at it doesn't make you my partner or business associate in any way.
However, if I employ you to spy for me, then we have a working relationship.

Hillary is known to have had a working relationship with Russian spies: they were trying to help her win the 2016 election.

Trump did not have any sort of working relationship at all with Russian spies. Someone offered him information that he was legally allowed to look at, and nothing came of that meeting.
You can not be that naive, Trump even personally cashes in on his weekly golf junkets to his resorts, did you think he gave the SS plus his entire entourage government discounts to stay at MaraLago? He even charges the SS for the golf carts they use to protect him. Multiply that scam by dozens and you can see the billions he is making pimping the Presidency

And Trump ain’t making anyone better other than Trump

The rest of your post is the usual AM talk radio rhetoric, “but, but, but, Hillary did this, Biden did that, ……,” and exactly what proof can you offer that nothing came of the Trump Tower meeting, plus why were they anxiously waiting to even take a meeting with a foreign adversary?
 
You can not be that naive, Trump even personally cashes in on his weekly golf junkets to his resorts,
'Cashes in' what, anchovies?
did you think he gave the SS plus his entire entourage government discounts to stay at MaraLago?
Yes, anchovies.
He even charges the SS for the golf carts they use to protect him.
Because they cost money to run, anchovies.
Multiply that scam by dozens and you can see the billions he is making pimping the Presidency
What scam, ancbhovies?
And Trump ain’t making anyone better other than Trump
TDS. Argument of the Stone fallacy.
The rest of your post is the usual AM talk radio rhetoric,
Cliche fallacy.
“but, but, but, Hillary did this, Biden did that, ……,”
Hillary has personally benefited from illegal emoluments and espionage. She has participated in federal welfare fraud. She has misappropriated charitable funds for personal use (almost none of it going to the charitable cause). This is called 'misrepresentation' and violates federal law. She has conducted murder by hire.

Biden assumed an office he was not elected for and was installed by Democrats. Biden committed four acts of treason. The process of installing Biden started the economic depression of Biden/Obama which lasted five years and saw the dollar devalued by 34%. He could barely walk, could not keep track of who he was talking to, where he was going, where he was, or what year it was.

Trump ended that economic depression, finally did something about Iran, removed a brutal dictator from Venezuela, vastly improved the border wall, shut down the open illegal immigration that occurred under Biden, and has been deporting illegal aliens.

and exactly what proof can you offer that nothing came of the Trump Tower meeting, plus why were they anxiously waiting to even take a meeting with a foreign adversary?
Trump is President of the United States. He sees foreign dignitaries from time to time, anchovies.
 
'Cashes in' what, anchovies?

Yes, anchovies.

Because they cost money to run, anchovies.

What scam, ancbhovies?

TDS. Argument of the Stone fallacy.

Cliche fallacy.

Hillary has personally benefited from illegal emoluments and espionage. She has participated in federal welfare fraud. She has misappropriated charitable funds for personal use (almost none of it going to the charitable cause). This is called 'misrepresentation' and violates federal law. She has conducted murder by hire.

Biden assumed an office he was not elected for and was installed by Democrats. Biden committed four acts of treason. The process of installing Biden started the economic depression of Biden/Obama which lasted five years and saw the dollar devalued by 34%. He could barely walk, could not keep track of who he was talking to, where he was going, where he was, or what year it was.

Trump ended that economic depression, finally did something about Iran, removed a brutal dictator from Venezuela, vastly improved the border wall, shut down the open illegal immigration that occurred under Biden, and has been deporting illegal aliens.


Trump is President of the United States. He sees foreign dignitaries from time to time, anchovies.
Not worth the time, but you got to laugh when asked why Junior, Jared, and Paul anxiously met with Russians in Trump Tower “pidgin’s” explanation is because “Trump is President of the United States. He sees foreign dignitaries from time to time,” ah, Trump wasn’t President at time, “pidgen” must be hitting the Kool Aid big time
 
Not worth the time, but you got to laugh when asked why Junior, Jared, and Paul anxiously met with Russians in Trump Tower “pidgin’s” explanation is because “Trump is President of the United States. He sees foreign dignitaries from time to time,” ah, Trump wasn’t President at time, “pidgen” must be hitting the Kool Aid big time
Laugh at what, anchovies?
You don't even like Kool-Aid.
I prefer soda.
 
Back
Top