Ilhan Omar’s Shady Castle Starts to Crumble

No, he was not charged with rape or convicted of rape.

She doesn’t even remember what year it supposedly happened.

You’ve been duped…again.
No you are the one duped as a jury and judge BOTH found him to have raped E Jean.

you have one sole defense and it is not that he was not found to have done it, AS HE WAS, and it is that....

'due to an outdated NYS law via a technicality then, that was at odds with most other State and Federal gov't definitions that include 'digital and item' penetration as rape, the NYS did not. It does now but did not then. And because of that I, Earl say "Trump wins again',. And i will ignore the case that followed where the Judge rendered his ruling that in this case 'sexual assault is synonymous with Rape' and 'yes Trump raped her'... because i do not like that ruling. 'Trump wins again'. /Earl

You have to be a total shit stain to see a win in any of that when Trump, in almost any other State of Federally would have had the Rape finding and not the sexual assault one. If you are able to spin that into a 'win for Trump' in your head you are deep in TDS. And a shit stain on life.
 
How could it possibly be true if no criminal court found it to be true?

A court found Trump raped Carol.

Juanita Broaddrick signed an affidavit saying Trump did not rape her.
So truth is only determined in court? You assholes claimed trump is guilty of insurrection on Jan 6 but according yo you the claim in not true. Excellent.

Courts never make mistakes. The stupid bitch didnt even know when the supposed rape took place. There is no justice in NY. They changed their state law so the gold digging whore could file the case. If you think that was a legit trial then youre dumber than I imagined.
 
synonymous
/səˈnänəməs/
Synonymous is an adjective meaning that two or more words have the same or nearly the same meaning, or that two concepts are so closely connected in people's minds that one suggests the other.

Definitions and Uses
    • Literal Meaning (Words): Two words that mean the same thing, or can be interchanged in context without changing the core message (for example, annoyed and irritated).
 
How could a defendant prove their innocence if the plantiff cant remember when the supposed crime took place?
Many ways, a denial under oath would be a good start, and because her claim was based on her statement plus Trumps claims that he does such things... Him denying it one the record would have been strong evidence in his favor.
 
Many ways, a denial under oath would be a good start, and because her claim was based on her statement plus Trumps claims that he does such things... Him denying it one the record would have been strong evidence in his favor.
The best way is to prove innocence is that I wasnt where the vicitim claims I was but the supposed victim here didnt even know when the crime happened so the defendent cant show he wasnt there.

Even if trump had done that assholes like you wouldnt have believed him anyway. Not everyone is as stupid as you.
 
You clearly do not believe your claim about Trump, a criminal conviction is not necessary for something to be true.

Logical argument prevails.
You clearly do not believe your claim about Trump, a criminal conviction is not necessary for something to be true.

Logical argument prevails.
Then make a logical argument.

Key details of the verdict include:

    • The Rape Charge: The jury rejected the specific claim that Trump raped E. Jean Carroll under New York's narrow legal definition at the time (which required forcible penile penetration).
    You’ve been duped again.
 
The best way is to prove innocence is that I wasnt where the vicitim claims I was but the supposed victim here didnt even know when the crime happened so the defendent cant show he wasnt there.

Even if trump had done that assholes like you wouldnt have believed him anyway. Not everyone is as stupid as you.
Its one way, another is to controvert the only evidence against you, say you did not do it.
 
Then make a logical argument.

Key details of the verdict include:

    • The Rape Charge: The jury rejected the specific claim that Trump raped E. Jean Carroll under New York's narrow legal definition at the time (which required forcible penile penetration).
    You’ve been duped again.
The Judge said it was still rape by the common definition.
 
Did a Criminal Court say that is true?
Yes, you have been duped again.

Yes, court records and legal documents in Kilmar Abrego Garcia's cases indicate that he entered the United States without documentation as a teenager.
  • Teenage Entry: Court documents and biographical overviews state that Abrego Garcia arrived in the U.S. around age 16 (in 2011 or 2012) after his family sent him from El Salvador. [1, 2]
    • Crossing Details: Public court records note that he crossed the Mexico–United States border near McAllen, Texas, without authorization.
Give it up, you are not bright enough to understand that President Trump has never been convicted of rape and Garcia was an illegal immigrant.

Have a teenager explain all this to you.
 
The Judge said it was still rape by the common definition.
In a jury trial, the judge does not render a verdict, the jury does.

You’ve been duped…again.

You need to debate with some of the far left loons on this forum.

You don’t do well with informed and intelligent conservative posters.

You are near the point of irrelevance, like Wrong Way Wally and Pobre.
 
Last edited:
Then make a logical argument.

Key details of the verdict include:

    • The Rape Charge: The jury rejected the specific claim that Trump raped E. Jean Carroll under New York's narrow legal definition at the time (which required forcible penile penetration).
    You’ve been duped again.
Then make a logical argument.

Key details of the verdict include:

    • The Rape Charge: The jury rejected the specific claim that Trump raped E. Jean Carroll under New York's narrow legal definition at the time (which required forcible penile penetration).
    You’ve been duped again.
Logical argument, She said he inserted his fingers into her vagina against her will. Trump was invited to tell his side, yet he refused.

The only evidence is that he did rape her.
 
Back
Top