500,000 kids could lose lunch due to trump

No, not after the teachers kick in. Afterall, THEY make so much you know. They buy school supplies for their kids. They have special days set aside in some cities and towns just for that. Maybe the GROCERY stores can set up special days to buy their kids food supplies, you know the non-perishables. Teachers have so much extra from their 'government' paid salaries.

Toxic Top pretends to be an ex-teacher on the Internet. Real teachers do, of course, support children receiving nutritious and well-balanced meals in order to facilitate learning. Even when, as you correctly pointed out, they're paying for them out of their own pockets. Nutrition is as much an essential part of education as are books, computers, and other supplies. A lot of which, as you again pointed out, teachers pay for out of their own pockets. My daughter's classroom. She is an actual teacher. Guess who paid for a good deal of this?

o5iArgE.jpg
 
This thread is a perfect example of the selfish, me-first, almost sociopathic "thinking" of many on the right. This country throws money right and left at bombs and armaments, wealthy people because they need more so that they can trickle down on us, and various other assorted bullshit programs. Yet the outrage from ppl in this thread is aimed at kids who go hungry, or who might go hungry, because that's just easier than doing something about the massive waste and unbalanced tax schemes.
 
This thread is a perfect example of the selfish, me-first, almost sociopathic "thinking" of many on the right. This country throws money right and left at bombs and armaments, wealthy people because they need more so that they can trickle down on us, and various other assorted bullshit programs. Yet the outrage from ppl in this thread is aimed at kids who go hungry, or who might go hungry, because that's just easier than doing something about the massive waste and unbalanced tax schemes.

Nazis always attack the weak!
 
Why don’t the parents of the children pay for their lunches, Snowflake?

If they can’t afford to pay for their own children’s sustenance, why did they have children for other parents to pay for their sustenance?

Irresponsible behavior by parents who have children that they can’t/won’t feed have consequences.

That very well could be earl.......... Or there could of been a death in the family, one or both parents are in Afghani_NAM defending you, their house burned down, etc etc etc............

Whatever, the kid has to eat, are you denying them even that earl???
 
Not the point, stupid! The point is that the Millionaire was able to do it under the current rules.

What is the nature of that Million?? A home or income of some type??

I dunno about there in Minni, but in many place in Calif your 50 year old track home is worth @ least that..

Is that the assets they are allowed to shield??
 
You probably had stuff they could take home (i.e. soap, deodorant, wipes, coats) I know of teachers buying dinner each day for their students.

That is very sad........ I know some that have had to take some in to live w/ their family for short periods & it is just a given they have to supply students out of their pockets...

30 years ago the lotto wanted us to vote to have it, they said it would all go to education, we would never have to worry about it again-in those days teachers didn't have to have all these expenses-really got duped on that one.....:palm:
 
Yes, that was an example from school districts in my area. The other is a hypothetical that IF parents spend the money as intended, do you still oppose those programs?

Since that what what You provided, that is what was addressed.

Now, you're moving the goalposts. You didn't pose it as a hypothetical.

I oppose any program where those that refuse to do for their own demand others be forced to do it. I don't owe their damn kids a thing nor do I think they owe mine anything.
 
Back
Top