500,000 kids could lose lunch due to trump

I know no one who doesn’t want hungry children fed. Our Catholic Charities feed them every day.

The sock and others like him never mention the obligation of parents to provide sustenance for the children that they have.

Should parents who have no children pay for others who have children that they can’t or won’t feed?

Should parents who struggle and sacrifice to feed their own children, subsidize those irresponsible parents?
 
I know no one who doesn’t want hungry children fed. Our Catholic Charities feed them every day.

The sock and others like him never mention the obligation of parents to provide sustenance for the children that they have.

Should parents who have no children pay for others who have children that they can’t or won’t feed?

Should parents who struggle and sacrifice to feed their own children, subsidize those irresponsible parents?

Another thing you know nothing about. 1,7 million American kids are food insufficient. https://mashable.com/2016/07/14/child-hunger-united-states/ Child hunger was a real problem until we found out you know better.
 
:lolup:

The always ignorant “show me where the Constitution says”. Always good for a laugh. :rofl2:

What's good for a laugh is when you can't show it yet still claim it should be done.

What's also funny is that after you posted a picture claiming it was me and where I lived, you were challenged to show up and do what you said you do prompting you to go into hiding.
 
Indeed.

I know no one who doesn’t want hungry children fed. Our Catholic Charities feed them every day.

The sock and others like him never mention the obligation of parents to provide sustenance for the children that they have.

Should parents who have no children pay for others who have children that they can’t or won’t feed?

Should parents who struggle and sacrifice to feed their own children, subsidize those irresponsible parents?
No and no.

These phony bleeding hearts are enablers of poor and abusive behavior, probably for votes.
 
What are you doing, are you a teacher as well???
No I am not a teacher. I volunteer quarterly at an at risk school. I have a relative that works as a teacher for a last chance turnaround school. I buy school and personal items in bulk to support the students.
 
F
No I am not a teacher. I volunteer quarterly at an at risk school. I have a relative that works as a teacher for a last chance turnaround school. I buy school and personal items in bulk to support the students.
Thanks for your charity, SC.

We support Catholic Charities, financially and physically.
There are hungry children in our area, many of whom are hungry because their parents are buying drugs instead of food.
 
No and no.

These phony bleeding hearts are enablers of poor and abusive behavior, probably for votes.

Bleeding hearts is the correct term to describe them. They talk about kids not being fed yet none of them on this thread have stepped up and volunteered to feed any of the kids. They encourage and enable irresponsible parents, claim they care, then support someone else footing the bill.

A bleeding heart is someone that claims to support a cause yet finds ways to spend someone else's money to pay for it.
 
No I am not a teacher. I volunteer quarterly at an at risk school. I have a relative that works as a teacher for a last chance turnaround school. I buy school and personal items in bulk to support the students.

That's exactly how it should be done and should be left up to the one choosing to do it not to the government to mandate you do it.
 
There is nothing wrong with helping people that are truly in need. However, It is wrong to be forced by government through taxes to do it.

Again, that's the way it should be done. When it comes to who, how, when, and where, the only one that can determine how he/she is going to help is he or she.
 
Back
Top