evince
Truthmatters
and you Putin nut sack washers claim its illegal for a human to enter the nation and ask for asylum which is a fucking anti constitutional lie
A primer and discussion of the 14th Amendment, Section 1.
- Thread starter Jarod
- Start date
and you Putin nut sack washers claim its illegal for a human to enter the nation and ask for asylum which is a fucking anti constitutional lie
What was he riding? A horse while was writing this?
By default since there was not much control of immigration at that time. But there is nothing in the 14th or naturalization laws that make a distinction between a child being born here who is the child of legal vs. illegal residents.
If Congress felt the 14th was being applied incorrectly it could have made that clear in later naturalization legislation but it remained those born here with no distinction between being legal or illegal.
Are doing shots in between your posts or something?
And it's all based on the opening statement. These persons are citizens and the Article continues to address these persons.
"All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States;"
Last edited:
The Constitution deals with asylum?
Yes, there was a need. The writer was continuing on with more to say on the same topic regarding citizens.
evince
Truthmatters
The second amendment applies to all arms. They didn't have any other intent. I am not advocating machine guns. As we saw in the 30's; that's a bad idea. But the founders did not place any limitations on the 2nd.
Mott the Hoople
Sweet Jane
No it doesn’t. It doesn’t say ANY person has ALL the rights of a citizen but that ALL people have the right to due process of law and equal protection under the law.
There's a LOT of irony in this statement. Here you are flailing trying to infer rights upon ILLEGAL aliens.
The world is laughing at you.
But you never do right? As you are with this issue? STFU, seriously.
I see that you get triggered when your inane arguments are shown to be inane. I am trying to figure out what your point even is. Who is not getting due process?
Constitutional rights apply to citizens. Due process is used when ILLEGALS cross our borders ILLEGALLY.
Unfortunately, it's necessary though. The grammar is what makes the distinction.
A comma would have shown a difference between person & citizen.
A semi colon shows that the two are the same (in the Article's context)
I have to laugh that you think your flailing and child like interpretations make you look educated. I am still not sure what argument you are attempting to make. Is someone not getting fair Due Process? Who is that?
You jerk off and then get made when you can't climax? Dumb.
Unfortunately, it's necessary though. The grammar is what makes the distinction.
A comma would have shown a difference between person & citizen.
A semi colon shows that the two are the same (in the Article's context)
Next you will argue that separate is equal.