Antisemitism has moved from the right to the left in the US − and falls back on long‑standing stereotypes

The study cited in your link notes that the vast majority of what they are calling "antisemitism" are anti gaza war protests.

That's not antisemitism.

You should also note that being pro palestinian isn't antisemitic either.

However marching with torches and pitchforks chanting "the Jews will not replace us" definitely is.

View attachment 92926
FYI pro Hamas/pro/IRGC rallies are all "anti-Semitic".

Expressing the opinion that "Israel isn't allowed to hunt down the Oct 7th terrorists" is anti-Semitic.

Pretending that there is a genocide happening in Gaza is anti-Semitic.

Denying that Hamas and the IRGC still share the goal of a genocide against Israel - to this very day - and that they have been working on this for several generations going well back before Oct 7th, is anti-Semitic because that is a lie that puts Israel at risk of annihilation.

Chanting "From the river to the sea" is a thinly couched call for genocide.

Every single anti-Gaza war protest is 100% anti-Semitic in nature, because what you're doing is saying that the Israelis have no right of self-defence.

Hamas started this war by burning children to death, raping and murdering women and children, and then parading their naked bodies through the streets of Gaza to be spat upon. Who are you to say that Hamas terrorists deserve more dignity than the women that they raped and murdered? Who's to say that their wives deserve better than death? And as far as children are concerned, the Israelis give ample notice before they bomb buildings... Every kid that's in there s a kid that Hamas wanted to be there, in order to die, to feed their PR campaign.



Too fuckin bad, pal: the Gazans don't get to dictate when this war ends, because they started it. It takes two sides to end a war, and this is over when Israel feels like they won't be bomdarded with 100,000 rockets again.
 
Screenshot 2026-08-21 at 12.55.38 PM.png
My condolences, Crepitus.

You can imagine him in heaven with 72 virgins, murdering Jews and then mutilating their bodies if it helps you feel better.
 
As any honest person has easily observed in recent years.

Antisemitism has moved from the right to the left in the US − and falls back on long‑standing stereotypes



The U.S. is currently experiencing one of the most significant waves of antisemitism that it has ever seen. Jewish communities are shaken and traumatized.

Jewish and civil rights organizations both in the U.S. and in other Western countries reported a rise in antisemitic incidents following the Oct. 7, 2023, Hamas attack on Israel and the subsequent Israeli military response. The Anti-Defamation League reported that in the first week after Hamas’ deadly attack, in which 1,400 Israelis were killed, antisemitic incidents in the U.S. tripled in comparison to the same week last year.

Similarly, London police recorded a 1,353% increase in antisemitic crimes compared with the same period a year earlier.

In addition, antisemitic symbols and rhetoric seem to be part of a growing number of protests that erupted around the globe following the escalation of the conflict between Israel and Hamas.

Most scholars agree that the term “antisemitism” describes animosity and discrimination against Jews. Broader definitions, such as the one adopted by the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance, include the singling out of Israel and the demonization of its character, such as the claim that “the existence of a State of Israel is a racist endeavor.”

My team of researchers at UMass Lowell and Development Service Group, a Washington, D.C.-based think tank, compiled and analyzed a comprehensive dataset of antisemitic incidents in the U.S. between 1990 and 2021. We wanted to understand what factors led to antisemitism. We covered violent antisemitism as well as incidents of antisemitic intimidation and vandalism. We included any attacks against Jews which were motivated by the religious identity of the victims – even if it was motivated by anger about Israeli policies.

Traditionally, antisemitism in the United States was promoted by far-right organizations and movements, such as the Ku Klux Klan, neo-Nazi groups and skinheads. Such groups focused on propagating traditional antisemitic narratives alleging Jews’ racial inferiority, their control of the financial sector and their role in global cabals aiming to undermine America and Western civilization.

More recently, progressive and left-leaning movements that are critical of Israel’s policies – especially with regard to the Palestinian population in the territories occupied by Israel in 1967 – have become linked to antisemitic practices, too.

In a survey conducted in 2018 in 12 European Union countries among victims of antisemitism, 21% indicated that they were physically or verbally attacked by what participants called “left-wing” activists. In the U.S., our data shows that 95% of antisemitic incidents motivated by Israel’s policies were perpetrated by far-left or unidentified activists. Just 5% were perpetrated by known far-right activists.

Further indication that antisemitic violence is no longer the sole domain of far-right extremists can be gleaned from an analysis of our data that looked at the geographic characteristics of antisemitism.

We find that antisemitic hate crimes are occurring especially in politically progressive areas of the country. The New York metropolitan area and the Northeast in general, and urban centers in Florida, California, the Northwest and the Midwest are experiencing the majority of antisemitic incidents.








So the truth is this. trumptards could give fuck all about Israel and the Jewish people. The only reason you care about Israel is you believe in the fucking fairy tale that Jews will be raptured and your other lord and savior will come.
 
And murdering Jews on the streets, attacking them with firebombs, etc., as well as attacking Synagogues and schools.
You guys are the violent ones. And you need to change you signature, bitch. Dems are killing you fucks in the polls.

1787344186537.png

Where's you get that 19% bitch? Out of your ass, no doubt!
 
Here's how leftards work:

If someone uses a truck to run over a bunch of people while yelling "allahu akbar" they say "That was probably just a mentally unhealthy guy, or an incel, so it doesn't count as a terrorist attack."

If someone finds writing on the side of a synogogue that says "Jews suck", that instantly gets logged as a "terrorist attack by white nationals", regardless of whether or not they saw the Dem or muslim holding the spray can..

If you don't believe me, look at the figures that leftists constantly cite for "terrorists by group".


Now, in answer to your question: yes, in a lot of cases it's quite virulent anti-Semitism. It's anti-Semitism when they're chanting "from the river to the sea" because that's a blatant call for genocide. It's anti-Semitism when they call the Israelis colonizers. It's anti-Semitism when they harrass, threaten and assault Jewish people.

ALL pro-Gaza protests are anti-Semitic in nature, because support for Hamas and the IRGC is support for a genocide against Jews.

FYI Hamas and the IRGC do NOT want peace in Gaza, Israel and the West Bank, and if you think that they do then you are a fucking idiot.

WTF are you even saying those things about Mamdani for? I never accused him of any of that. I just said that his wife is a huge Hamas supporter, so he is a Hamas supporter.

Mamdani's wife is a vile, atrocious pig of a woman and no decent person could share a bed with her. So Mamdani - is - a - vile - pig.
Ah, the history of shooting up snagog
Here's how leftards work:

If someone uses a truck to run over a bunch of people while yelling "allahu akbar" they say "That was probably just a mentally unhealthy guy, or an incel, so it doesn't count as a terrorist attack."

If someone finds writing on the side of a synogogue that says "Jews suck", that instantly gets logged as a "terrorist attack by white nationals", regardless of whether or not they saw the Dem or muslim holding the spray can..

If you don't believe me, look at the figures that leftists constantly cite for "terrorists by group".


Now, in answer to your question: yes, in a lot of cases it's quite virulent anti-Semitism. It's anti-Semitism when they're chanting "from the river to the sea" because that's a blatant call for genocide. It's anti-Semitism when they call the Israelis colonizers. It's anti-Semitism when they harrass, threaten and assault Jewish people.

ALL pro-Gaza protests are anti-Semitic in nature, because support for Hamas and the IRGC is support for a genocide against Jews.

FYI Hamas and the IRGC do NOT want peace in Gaza, Israel and the West Bank, and if you think that they do then you are a fucking idiot.

WTF are you even saying those things about Mamdani for? I never accused him of any of that. I just said that his wife is a huge Hamas supporter, so he is a Hamas supporter.

Mamdani's wife is a vile, atrocious pig of a woman and no decent person could share a bed with her. So Mamdani - is - a - vile - pig.
Ah, “leftist protests?” It ain’t “leftist protests” who have a history of shooting up synagogues

After listing supposed examples of Mamdani and others instances of antisemitism you asked for GOP figures with antisemitism backgrounds trying to prove a point, I delivered, not just figures, but the main man, your Messiah
 
Archives: your dislike of Grok and mistrust of Elon is entirely misplaced.

Twitter before Elon:
  • was a member of TNI, along with Reuters, BBC, CBC, Associated Press, NYT, WashPo, FB, Google and others
  • TNI members (FB and Twitter) famously banned people from their social media accounts for saying things which were known at the time to be true, they even did it to the NYPost. That's kind of AWESOME for NYT when the NYPost gets kicked off of social media, right? Especially for saying things that even Hunter Biden acknowledges to be factual...
  • TNI members pushed all of the Fauci narratives which are now known to be lies
  • Twitter used their algorithms to elevate Faucian fibs and downplay facts
  • TWITTER DENIED THEIR USE OF BOT ACCOUNTS, TO PUSH THEIR NARRATIVES - aka they lied to us both
  • Twitter's bot accounts quickly liked and shared posts that synced with TNI's false narratives (eg "everybody say 'pangolin', no one is allowed to say BSL4 lab or they're racist!")
  • MSM members of TNI used the number of "twitter likes and re-tweets" like polling data, to say "LOOK: HER POST GOT 80,000 LIKES AND 20,000 RE-TWEETS!!!! THIS IS WHAT EVERYONE BELIEVES!!!"
  • even this week, Associated Press pumped out another article about Fauci's associates' criminality which was rife with omissions and lies, and that article was shared by CNN and CTV News (Canada), who aren't even officially TNI members. I fuckin dare you to take me on if you think that Associated Press didn't just churn out more lies to protect their covid-era disinformation campaign
Grok has no history of lying to you like the TNI members do, archives.

Elon has no history of lying to you like the TNI members do, archives.

Elon's "sin" was breaking the TNI monopoly. He took a big chunk out of Big Brother.

What else did Elon actually do, archives? What was so bad about pulling Twitter out of TNI? Can you explain that to me? FYI Elon was EXTREMELY popular among leftists before he broke their monopoly on news & social media. So why the sudden fall from grace, just for breaking up a monopoly held by liars?
Lets use Google AI in response:

Grok makes mistakes, generates factual errors, and has been involved in several major controversies regarding incorrect or harmful outputs. Like other large language models, it prioritizes plausible text over absolute truth and can fail at basic reasoning or recall.”
Grok can provide false information, fabricate details, and deny its own errors. When users push back or ask about topics it does not know, Grok often invents convincing narratives, dates, or specific details rather than admitting it lacks the information.“


“Users have documented instances where Grok gaslights or insists its fabricated outputs or past responses are real, even when confronted with direct proof otherwise. Because Grok pulls heavily from real-time data and public posts on X (formerly Twitter), it can absorb, amplify, and repeat unverified rumors, conspiracy theories, or systemic biases present on the platform”
“Elon Musk directly shapes Grok. The AI often mirrors Musk's own public views and real-time posts on X.“

Want ChatGPT‘s opinion?
 
So you think the civilians should have fought off the IDF in Gaza? With what, bitch?
Look at you, proving how stupid you are while you're calling other people names...

Hamas started the war, right, f-tard?

Maybe Hamas should have also fought the war instead of hiding in tunnels like little bitches, you fucking moron.

When was the last time the Americans, Canadians, Israelis or British fought a war where their soldiers were just in hiding, and leaving the civilian population to deal with the enemy army themselves?

When was that, you fuckin' bitch?

What do you think would happen to the civilian population of Israel if all of their soldiers were just hiding underground while Hamas owned the streets? Can you even admit to what would happen you God-damned weasel?
It's amazing how those who worship trump also worship stupidity.
It's amazing that leftards even bring up the topic of intelligence when it's obviously such a sore spot for you all.
 
And we tRump starts a war he denies it, and when he loses he declares victory.
What war did Trump start, and then deny?

What war did trump lose?

You seem to be aware of a bunch of wars that no one else knows about.
Jihad, BTW is a specific kind of war, not just "war".
1) It's true that jihad actually just means "the struggle" in Arabic, but even the Arabic usage of that term does include acts of war
2) However; jihadi is a term that's almost exclusively used to mean "a muslim who's involved in war to expand islamic influence, or against infidels, etc", when used by westerners. The term jihadi is without a non-wartime meaning when it's used by English-speakers. By the classic definition it could mean a defensive war, but it's never used that way.
3) The common usage of a word, and they way that it is commonly interpreted, is what actually determines its meaning, because the English language is for communicating effectively, not for dictionary standoffs. Ergo, if the vast majority of the population uses the word jihadi to mean "_____", then "_____" will eventually end up in the dictionary beside that word.

Do you know what people mean when they say jihadi? Good. Then it's settled.

And FYI, no one mangles the English language more than leftards. You can't even use words like "man" and "woman" correctly ffs. FYI the version of a word that's traditionally correct, and was exclusively used to mean one thing for 1,000 years, and is used by the vast majority of people to mean one specific thing, remains "the main definition of that word". Just because yer feewin's are hurty doesn't mean that the majority of people have to change the way they use their vocabulary drastically.

Other words/terms commonly abused by left4rds:
  1. seditious
  2. liar
  3. lied
  4. verified
  5. qualified
  6. capable
  7. legitimate
  8. peaceful
  9. cognitive dissonance
  10. confirmation bias
  11. vaccine
  12. fascist
  13. Nazi
  14. racist
  15. misogynist
  16. violence
  17. rape
  18. rapist
  19. journalism
  20. fact check
  21. democracy
  22. victim
  23. dementia
  24. guilty
  25. criminal...
 
Ah, the history of shooting up snagog
The KKK was a democrat militia, remember. The Democrats have always been the slavers and racists, and to this day, they are the ones who are constantly dividing people by sex, race, wealth, class, etc.
It's also the democrats who like to import "cheap labour ;)" in modern times, just like back in the 'chainier' days of old.
Ah, “leftist protests?” It ain’t “leftist protests” who have a history of shooting up synagogues
Leftists are the only people shooting at synagogues and attacking Jews.
After listing supposed examples of Mamdani and others instances of antisemitism you asked for GOP figures with antisemitism backgrounds trying to prove a point, I delivered, not just figures, but the main man, your Messiah
Israel's greatest ally on earth is an anti-Semite now?

If that's the case, then Israel's situation is even more precarious than I thought. maybe they should just start nuking their enemies right now while they're still alive.
 
Lets use Google AI in response:

Grok makes mistakes, generates factual errors, and has been involved in several major controversies regarding incorrect or harmful outputs. Like other large language models, it prioritizes plausible text over absolute truth and can fail at basic reasoning or recall.”
Grok can provide false information, fabricate details, and deny its own errors. When users push back or ask about topics it does not know, Grok often invents convincing narratives, dates, or specific details rather than admitting it lacks the information.“


“Users have documented instances where Grok gaslights or insists its fabricated outputs or past responses are real, even when confronted with direct proof otherwise. Because Grok pulls heavily from real-time data and public posts on X (formerly Twitter), it can absorb, amplify, and repeat unverified rumors, conspiracy theories, or systemic biases present on the platform”
“Elon Musk directly shapes Grok. The AI often mirrors Musk's own public views and real-time posts on X.“

Want ChatGPT‘s opinion?
Buddy I've posted several examples of Google AI search actually lying here, in this forum. As in, it has the correct answer when you back it into a corner, but it initially throws out leftist lies and propaganda.

Just the other day I started a thread in here where I asked Google to describe mohammed, Jesus and Buddha and it described mohammed as "a guy who was known for helping with domestic chores, he was trustworthy", and one other BS characteristic.

I had to explain to it that if someone marries a child and has sex with her, then chops a bunch of people's heads off for refusing to join their religion, and forces women and children into rape-slavery, those are usually their "defining characteristics." No one remembers Ted Bundy as a really swell cribbage player.
 
What war did Trump start, and then deny?

What war did trump lose?

You seem to be aware of a bunch of wars that no one else knows about.

1) It's true that jihad actually just means "the struggle" in Arabic, but even the Arabic usage of that term does include acts of war
2) However; jihadi is a term that's almost exclusively used to mean "a muslim who's involved in war to expand islamic influence, or against infidels, etc", when used by westerners. The term jihadi is without a non-wartime meaning when it's used by English-speakers. By the classic definition it could mean a defensive war, but it's never used that way.
3) The common usage of a word, and they way that it is commonly interpreted, is what actually determines its meaning, because the English language is for communicating effectively, not for dictionary standoffs. Ergo, if the vast majority of the population uses the word jihadi to mean "_____", then "_____" will eventually end up in the dictionary beside that word.

Do you know what people mean when they say jihadi? Good. Then it's settled.

And FYI, no one mangles the English language more than leftards. You can't even use words like "man" and "woman" correctly ffs. FYI the version of a word that's traditionally correct, and was exclusively used to mean one thing for 1,000 years, and is used by the vast majority of people to mean one specific thing, remains "the main definition of that word". Just because yer feewin's are hurty doesn't mean that the majority of people have to change the way they use their vocabulary drastically.

Other words/terms commonly abused by left4rds:
  1. seditious
  2. liar
  3. lied
  4. verified
  5. qualified
  6. capable
  7. legitimate
  8. peaceful
  9. cognitive dissonance
  10. confirmation bias
  11. vaccine
  12. fascist
  13. Nazi
  14. racist
  15. misogynist
  16. violence
  17. rape
  18. rapist
  19. journalism
  20. fact check
  21. democracy
  22. victim
  23. dementia
  24. guilty
  25. criminal...
The list is further than that. Gfm7175 has compiled a much larger list. It can be found here.
 
Back
Top