Archaeology of the New Testament

[Into the Night]

Derp.
Derp.
Derp.

Argument of the Stone fallacy.

 

[ZenMode]

Inversion fallacy.

Inversion fallacy. Argument of the Stone fallacy.

Argument of the Stone fallacy.

Argument of the Stone fallacy. Bulverism fallacy.

Thanks for proving my point....again.

 

[ZenMode]

Argument of the Stone fallacy.

Inversion fallacy.

There certainly is. You just don't know what the word means.

There certainly is. You just don't know what the word means.

There certainly is.
https://www.amazon.com/Triple-XXX-ANTONIO-LONGNECKS-12-Ounce/dp/B001IW1VP2
There are also XXX sized shirts and other clothing.

Inversion fallacy.

Erp-a-derp.

 

[IBDaMann]

.

* Which humans do you believe have been on the planet for hundreds of thousands of years?

Do you want their names and locations?

That would be fine.

... that detail wasn't just pulled from the "internet".

* You did, in fact, pull that "detail" off the internet.

Correct and, as you already know, not all "Internet" was the same.

Too funny!

 

[IBDaMann]

99.99999 percent of the time, any discussion of humans on this forum is about our species homo sapiens, and it is so manifestly self evident nobody bothers to ask about it or play word games.

Why are you getting so defensive? Why are you pivoting? Instead, you should be explaining how you and he know, with certainty, about the unobserved past. Feel free to become defensive when your omniscience fallacies come under attack because you have nothing else.

Anyone who reads National Geographic, popular science articles, ...

... is in a world of hurt.

... has been aware for decades that the evidence is homo sapiens first evolved a few hundred thousand years ago.

You still haven't answered the question. Why should any rational adult adopt your conclusions about the unobserved past? ... because you read it on the internet? Is that why?

 

[ZenMode]

.

That would be fine.

Translation: I'm not attempting to have a serious conversation, I am only trolling.