Of course they do. This "criminals don't care about the laws bullshit" is just that, bullshit. If the one selling or giving someone a gun knew they could go to prison for doing so they would think a lot harder about doing it. And if the criminal knew he could reduce his sentence by giving up that individual he would do it. To say it would not make a difference because a criminal is a criminal is simply fucking stupid.
The hell they don't. That is a perfect example of a good reason to keep semi autos with large magazines. Hogs do tremendous damage and tell me you could do this with a single shot rifle.
No it is not a felony for you to sell a gun to someone else and you have no way of knowing if that someone else is a criminal.
And how the fuck do you know if they are legally allowed to own one.
I see, to know if he is a criminal you just ask him. what the fuck do you think he will say?
No those laws are not in place. They are not in place for a gun dealer much less a private individual.
what a fucking stupid thing to say.
There is no law that prevents you from selling a gun to someone and since you have no way of knowing if he is mentally deranged and should not have one there is no law for you to be prosecuted for.
So what exactly was the press supposed to do? Just assume he was lying? Were they supposed to tell us what he said, but then say "oh, but he might be lying." The media did its job. It got the information, and reported it to the public. Then when new information was available, it reported that too. Journalists aren't psychic, we can't expect them to always know when people are lying.
And yes, the media is anti-white, but by saying the coverage of this story is anti-white, when it's not, you're making it easier for people to laugh our legit criticism off.
It's not that they reported the information they had, it's the way they reported it. The media was more than happy to put idiots like Kamalawhore Harris and Spartacus Booker on TV claiming what happened to Jussie was a modern day lynching.
Since what the faggot black boy claimed was a lie, none of those claims were true. Where have Harris and Booker been claiming they were wrong? The media looked for idiots like that to make such claims yet run from looking for them same idiots to say they were wrong.
When the coverage by the media emphasized WHITES in MAGA hats, it pushed the anti white agenda. The media, and plenty of those the media put front and center, made it another anti white rant. They wanted what the black faggot said to be true. Anything else was unacceptable to them and it showed.
There are already laws and plea bargains that address this and what have they stopped??
You're not going to make much money hunting hogs with a helicopter anyway.
It is if that person isn't legally allowed to have a gun.
There are ways to know. You ignore them.
By asking the right questions.
Well the press doesn't control what their guests say. And given what we knew, it sounded like it was a modern day lynching. It sounds like you think people should have assumed Jussie was lying.
Harris and Booker probably don't want to talk about how they were wrong because they think it makes them look bad. That's obviously not the fault of the press. They can't control if politicians don't want to come on to apologize.
While the media is anti-white, this specific case can't be blamed on the media. The kid was wearing a MAGA hat, what did you expect? And yeah, they probably did want what Jussie said to be true, because they get more material for propaganda, but they way they covered the story wasn't wrong.
What is the right question?
The parkland shooter was legally allowed to own one and should not have been based on what everyone found out inside of one day after the shooting. Tell me just how could someone have found out about the multiple times police said he was a fucking whacko? What question do you ask to find that out?
They don't hunt them like that to make money, they do it to save money. The cost of the damage caused by them is astronomical.