No. They became rich capitalists. With work ethic and respect for their employees. Because they actually work alongside of them.Yep. They died for the rich Capitalists.
No. They became rich capitalists. With work ethic and respect for their employees. Because they actually work alongside of them.Yep. They died for the rich Capitalists.
Any reasonable society would put restrictions on this making the parents responsible for the welfare of their children.
So precisely accurate.So simplistic.
Wrong! That is Communism. In Capitalism, if you don't want to work no one is going to force you to. In Communism, you work or you go to the gulag, or get shot, or something.
I didn't. They are the same thing, only varying by degree. Don't go making shit up.Notice how quickly they gave up arguing that Communism and Socialism are the same thing…. They can’t defend it, but the still “believe” it, cuz Trump.
@T. A. Gardner @Stone
So controlled Capitalism? Socialism function under Capitalism.Any reasonable society would put restrictions on this making the parents responsible for the welfare of their children.
Either they're the same thing or they are notI didn't. They are the same thing, only varying by degree. Don't go making shit up.
This too is wrong. Communism is an economic system very similar to Socialism. However, because Communism is absolute, it requires a specific kind of government--dictatorship--in order to function. Socialism only requires a large, intrusive, government but not a dictatorship to work.See, communism is a form of Government, not just an economic system, and that is what The Sleepy PP cant understand. Or he does, but thinks you are stupid enough to fall for it.
@T. A. Gardner
Unfettered Capitalism is essentially a barter economy. That doesn't work anymore than a totally Socialist / Communist economy does.So controlled Capitalism? Socialism function under Capitalism.
The economic system in America isn't perfect, but it has done us well for ages
Citation? You are badly confused.This too is wrong. Communism is an economic system very similar to Socialism. However, because Communism is absolute, it requires a specific kind of government--dictatorship--in order to function. Socialism only requires a large, intrusive, government but not a dictatorship to work.
Correct. Neither Communism nor Capitalism are a form of government. Communism requires a dictatorship to work, so one goes with the other. Capitalism requires a free society to work so that means, realistically, some sort of democracy to work.Citation? You are badly confused.
There are Communist countries, but there are not Capitalist countries. Capitalism is not a form of government.
Socialism is not a form of government either. You see, it is not the same as Communism, no matter what the PP tries to program into your head.Correct. Neither Communism nor Capitalism are a form of government. Communism requires a dictatorship to work, so one goes with the other. Capitalism requires a free society to work so that means, realistically, some sort of democracy to work.
Different terms typically have different meanings. They do here. Social Security is a socialist program, not a Communist program. For what's is worth here is part of AI on the difference between socialism and communism:I didn't. They are the same thing, only varying by degree. Don't go making shit up.
I'm not saying Socialism is a form of government. But it requires a big, intrusive, overbearing government of some sort to work. It is the same as Communism, just differing by degree.Socialism is not a form of government either. You see, it is not the same as Communism, no matter what the PP tries to program into your head.
Social Security is a retirement / pension fund. Both Socialist and Communist systems have something similar embedded into them. At the more extreme, it is the only pension system the government allows. In most Socialist systems you can have a private retirement fund of some sort, even if just banked money, but that doesn't change the nature of the government run system.Different terms typically have different meanings. They do here. Social Security is a socialist program, not a Communist program. For what's is worth here is part of AI on the difference between socialism and communism:
'Communism and socialism are related left-wing economic philosophies, but communism is a more radical system that entirely eliminates private property, money, and social classes. While both ideologies emerged as a rejection of capitalist exploitation during the Industrial Revolution, they differ significantly in their scope, methods of implementation, and compensation structures. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]"
Social Security is a retirement / pension fund. Both Socialist and Communist systems have something similar embedded into them. At the more extreme, it is the only pension system the government allows. In most Socialist systems you can have a private retirement fund of some sort, even if just banked money, but that doesn't change the nature of the government run system.
You quote from AI isn't worth a thimble of piss.
As does this magat form of Capitalism/Kleptocracy we have seen growing since Trump 1 government.I'm not saying Socialism is a form of government. But it requires a big, intrusive, overbearing government of some sort to work. It is the same as Communism, just differing by degree.
Doesn't Capitalism require government for management?I'm not saying Socialism is a form of government. But it requires a big, intrusive, overbearing government of some sort to work. It is the same as Communism, just differing by degree.
Study up!I'm not saying Socialism is a form of government. But it requires a big, intrusive, overbearing government of some sort to work. It is the same as Communism, just differing by degree.
Social security is a government enforced retirement system, managed and operated by the federal government. Absolutely not Capitalism, absolutely is Socialism.Social Security is a retirement / pension fund. Both Socialist and Communist systems have something similar embedded into them. At the more extreme, it is the only pension system the government allows. In most Socialist systems you can have a private retirement fund of some sort, even if just banked money, but that doesn't change the nature of the government run system.
You quote from AI isn't worth a thimble of piss.