LOL!
You're still not getting it.
The tax cut is the problem here because the tax cut is what exploded the deficit by 32%. So you keep talking vaguely about "cutting spending", but you don't really have an idea of what that entails, nor do you have any plan to replace that spending with anything in the economy. When you cut government spending, you cut demand in the economy. If you don't replace that demand with any, you end up contracting the economy because there's less spending.
You clowns seem to think that for every dollar in government spending that is cut, there's an equal and opposite increase in spending from the private sector. And that's just fucking stupid. So you want to cut spending, but you don't really know what you want to cut, and then to top it all off, you're not replacing government spending with any other spending, thus you're contracting the economy.
What a fucking idiot.
I know the tax cut exploded the deficit (plus the large increase in spending). That is why I said I opposed it (you must have not read that part) without spending cuts. I know what I want to cut--everything. Eliminate many old and ineffective programs, allow competitive bidding for Medicare, stop government funding based on numbers, Social Security benefits that are not needed, and many more.
Consumer spending makes up 68% of the economy--that is the source of demand, not government spending. If you increase taxes that is taking money out of the economy. Without higher taxes you have to borrow which gives you a temporary boost in the economy at the expense of lower GDP later.