First Post
- Thread starter WCM
- Start date
I'll bet you anything that I don't watch whoever those people are nor do I rely on CNN for the majority of my information about current events. CNN is more of a tabloid these days than a legit news source. Do you think that Reuters, AP, the BBC, NYT, WSJ are all "fake news" too?
Please carry on with your cliches and wishful thinking. It's better if you "conservatives" (hahaha!) believe in myths about us non-MAGATs.
But you support genocide. You want to kill all the Jews in Israel because the land should be ruled by Islam.
Because Muslims only control 99% of the land in the middle east, and the greedy Jews won't give you the other 1% - NO FAIR!
Supporting genocide and the destruction of Israel shows bad character. Ultimately you are a Muslim Supremacist, not a conservative.
So you wanna ignore all the on-topic content of my post, chime in with a total non-sequitur about Phan (whoever that is) for some reason, then tell me "what adults do" lol.
When we put aside the insults, people often find they share common grounds on a lot of issues.
At repolitics I saw the same thing... No leftists there would admit to watching CNN, but they all repeat the exact same BS narratives somehow.
If CNN's narratives are always the same as the ones that you believe, then why don't you just go straight to the source for your news?
So fking ironic that you'd say that lol.
Do you consider all of them to be independent sources from one another?
Do you think that they all do their own independent journalism and just randomly end up with all the exact same narratives? That gives the illusion of it all being true, right?
You're in for a surprise, dear owl. Google TNI. "Trusted News Initiative".
You'll find out that all those people you named, who all coincidentally ended up with the EXACT same covid narratives and the EXACT same Russian collusion narratives were all collaborating. Not "allegedly" collaborating, they bragged about it. They were "officially" collaborating.
And it wasn't just them. They had FB, Google, YouTube and Twitter following along with them. And the Euro Broadcasting Union, CBC, etc.
If you think back to the beginning of covid, all of those people were saying the exact same things on full blast, 24/7. They all backed Lord Fauci. But what's worse is they all went directly against all kinds of things, for example: the possibility of the BSL4 lab as the origin.
No big deal right? Well, it is a big deal, because while all those news orgs were saying "the pangolin did it!", the social media giants were scrubbing all talk of the BSL4 lab from the internet. How legit is that? Kinda scary, maybe? Like book-burning in real time...? People were getting shadow-banned and banned from FB and Twitter for talking about the BSL4 lab, because "They're spreading dangerous disinformation! We need to protect the public!"lol.
And in case you forgot, before Elon Musk bought Twitter, we were all told that shadow-bans were just an urban myth. Conservatives were mocked for talking about shadow-bans. "Twitter and FB are above that. They would never intrude of freedom of speech just to shut down conservative ass-clowns! HAHAHAHA! HAHAAAA! HAHAHAAAA!" And that was actually an important legal distinction, because those platforms got freedoms from regulatory bodies because they theoretically weren't "content editors", but controlling what people were allowed to talk about legally made them content editors.
Not just the BSL4 one either... How about the NYPost being banned from social media for saying things about the laptop that were all known to be true by the FBI [who had the laptop in their possession for 11 months at that point...] "51 former intelligence officers" were all lying about the laptop, and TNI all went with their story. Is it a big deal that the TNI collaborators banned a major news publication from social media, and no major publications spoke out against that absurd level of censorship, just before a presidential election? You tell me, wise owl.
TNI, from CBC: https://www.cbc.ca/news/cbc-news-trust-project-1.4855367
- CBC News added its name Tuesday to a growing list of news organizations around the world that are committed to enhancing transparency and building trust with their audiences.
Other participants in the Trust Project, an initiative housed at the Markkula Center for Applied Ethics at Santa Clara University, include the New York Times, the Economist, the Globe and Mail and the Washington Post.
- The Trusted News Initiative is a partnership, founded by the BBC, that includes organisations from around the globe including; AP, AFP, BBC, CBC/Radio-Canada, European Broadcasting Union (EBU), Financial Times, Information Futures Lab, Google/YouTube, The Hindu, The Nation Media Group, Meta, Microsoft, Thomson Reuters, Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, Twitter, The Washington Post, Kompas – Indonesia, Dawn – Pakistan, Indian Express, NDTV – India, ABC – Australia, SBS – Australia, NHK – Japan.
Your "several sources" theory was just a sad illusion. You have been getting the exact same shit from different piles this whole time
Imagine walking into a Midwest union hall and telling the workers you have a healthy distain for half of them.
Just because you are dishonest and lack critical thinking skills, does not mean that the rest of us are so handicapped. You got banned from that forum, didn't you?
I'm going to try to plow through this verbal diarrhea but probably won't make it to the end. You know what poor attention spans we Leftist Scum have, right?
Yes, they are all independent corporations with their own staffs, CEOs, policies, shareholders, boards of directors. They are CORPORATIONS. I thought I'd enlarge that to make it clear. They are in business to make money. Of course they often run the same stories -- they are competing for a share of the audience. They show what they believe viewers want to see. That's one reason why CNN and other news media, including and especially Fox, have gone more tabloid and much less hard news. We watch NBC. Every night they have a story about some teenager, usually a pretty White girl, goes missing in a foreign country, or a husband is on trial for allegedly killing his wife, or some Hollywood star died/got married/got divorced/went to rehab. Tabloid stuff, isn't it? That's what their bean counters say people want.
Ah. I see why you are so terrified. Quelle horror!
Time to
Owl, it's pathetic that you can't even acknowledge what you just looked at.Just because you are dishonest and lack critical thinking skills, does not mean that the rest of us are so handicapped. You got banned from that forum, didn't you?
I'm going to try to plow through this verbal diarrhea but probably won't make it to the end. You know what poor attention spans we Leftist Scum have, right?
Yes, they are all independent corporations with their own staffs, CEOs, policies, shareholders, boards of directors. They are CORPORATIONS. I thought I'd enlarge that to make it clear. They are in business to make money. Of course they often run the same stories -- they are competing for a share of the audience. They show what they believe viewers want to see. That's one reason why CNN and other news media, including and especially Fox, have gone more tabloid and much less hard news. We watch NBC. Every night they have a story about some teenager, usually a pretty White girl, goes missing in a foreign country, or a husband is on trial for allegedly killing his wife, or some Hollywood star died/got married/got divorced/went to rehab. Tabloid stuff, isn't it? That's what their bean counters say people want.
Ah. I see why you are so terrified. Quelle horror!
Time to
When was the last time you saw a bunch of people get together to come up with a story, and suppress other information, when they were telling the truth?
If I wanna tell the truth, I just tell the fkn truth, I don't gather 6 other people together and get everyone to make sure that we're all saying the same thing before we speak, while trying to silence others.
Do you remember how they tried to stifle conversation about the BSL4 lab, birdbrain?
It was obviously really important for them to get the pangolin narrative out there, and suppress info about the BSL4 lab, but why, owly?
Was it because "the guy who was spreading the pangolin narrative knew that he had actually funded research to make the bat coronavirus transmissible among human cells just a block away from the wetmarket"?
Think about that for a second... Before you ever saw Fauci utter the word pangolin, he already knew that the only other, and more likely alternative, was "the virus I created a block away" lol.
Would you have "trusted the science" if you knew that mr science incarnate had probably created covid in the first place?
My prediction: you ignore the facts here and come back with more sandbox insults.
Isn't it weird that it took a while for Democrats to oppose genocide?
But I just gotta know: how can Democrats oppose genocide, yet side with the ayatollah and the Palestinians, who have been openly calling for genocide against Israel for decades? That's like saying "I hate football, but I love the Dallas Cowboys and and Seattle Seahawks!"
Matt Dillon
Retardium User
AP/Reuters puts out the propaganda, and the networds all regurgitate it with their own little personal spin added. FOX too.At repolitics I saw the same thing... No leftists there would admit to watching CNN, but they all repeat the exact same BS narratives somehow.
If CNN's narratives are always the same as the ones that you believe, then why don't you just go straight to the source for your news?
So fking ironic that you'd say that lol.
Do you consider all of them to be independent sources from one another?
Do you think that they all do their own independent journalism and just randomly end up with all the exact same narratives? That gives the illusion of it all being true, right?
You're in for a surprise, dear owl. Google TNI. "Trusted News Initiative".
You'll find out that all those people you named, who all coincidentally ended up with the EXACT same covid narratives and the EXACT same Russian collusion narratives were all collaborating. Not "allegedly" collaborating, they bragged about it. They were "officially" collaborating.
And it wasn't just them. They had FB, Google, YouTube and Twitter following along with them. And the Euro Broadcasting Union, CBC, etc.
If you think back to the beginning of covid, all of those people were saying the exact same things on full blast, 24/7. They all backed Lord Fauci. But what's worse is they all went directly against all kinds of things, for example: the possibility of the BSL4 lab as the origin.
No big deal right? Well, it is a big deal, because while all those news orgs were saying "the pangolin did it!", the social media giants were scrubbing all talk of the BSL4 lab from the internet. How legit is that? Kinda scary, maybe? Like book-burning in real time...? People were getting shadow-banned and banned from FB and Twitter for talking about the BSL4 lab, because "They're spreading dangerous disinformation! We need to protect the public!"lol.
And in case you forgot, before Elon Musk bought Twitter, we were all told that shadow-bans were just an urban myth. Conservatives were mocked for talking about shadow-bans. "Twitter and FB are above that. They would never intrude of freedom of speech just to shut down conservative ass-clowns! HAHAHAHA! HAHAAAA! HAHAHAAAA!" And that was actually an important legal distinction, because those platforms got freedoms from regulatory bodies because they theoretically weren't "content editors", but controlling what people were allowed to talk about legally made them content editors.
Not just the BSL4 one either... How about the NYPost being banned from social media for saying things about the laptop that were all known to be true by the FBI [who had the laptop in their possession for 11 months at that point...] "51 former intelligence officers" were all lying about the laptop, and TNI all went with their story. Is it a big deal that the TNI collaborators banned a major news publication from social media, and no major publications spoke out against that absurd level of censorship, just before a presidential election? You tell me, wise owl.
TNI, from CBC: https://www.cbc.ca/news/cbc-news-trust-project-1.4855367
TNI from BBC: https://www.bbc.co.uk/beyondfakenews/trusted-news-initiative/
- CBC News added its name Tuesday to a growing list of news organizations around the world that are committed to enhancing transparency and building trust with their audiences.
Other participants in the Trust Project, an initiative housed at the Markkula Center for Applied Ethics at Santa Clara University, include the New York Times, the Economist, the Globe and Mail and the Washington Post.
- The Trusted News Initiative is a partnership, founded by the BBC, that includes organisations from around the globe including; AP, AFP, BBC, CBC/Radio-Canada, European Broadcasting Union (EBU), Financial Times, Information Futures Lab, Google/YouTube, The Hindu, The Nation Media Group, Meta, Microsoft, Thomson Reuters, Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, Twitter, The Washington Post, Kompas – Indonesia, Dawn – Pakistan, Indian Express, NDTV – India, ABC – Australia, SBS – Australia, NHK – Japan.
Your "several sources" theory was just a sad illusion. You have been getting the exact same shit from different piles this whole time
Typical leftist: just plain stupid.
T. A. Gardner
Serial Thread Killer
It's been truly disappointing, acolyte owl.
You should really be alarmed that all of those outlets are posing as independent news organizations when they're really just narrative streamers. And again, it's not like they're just trying to tell the story the way they see it, they're intentionally lying and attacking free speech.
You have to admit that at the end of the day, you'd think that with all of their combined brainpower (hundreds of thousands of people, spread all over the world, with access to mountains of information), they'd be right more often than not, but they get a lot of really easy ones completely wrong.
They conspired to ban the NYPost from social media, Owl, and they had the story 100% wrong. Isn't it just a bit weird to you that the people who got it all wrong had complete control of the story, and they got to shut down the truth? That's not fkn alarming to you?
And remember: not one of those guys even noticed Biden's dementia ffs, and they all had access to him several times a day. Even after the debate meltdown they still tried to pump up his ires for a couple days, but it was too late, because the American public all saw it.
Isn't that weird for you? Their story went "He's perfectly fine" for 2 full years while he was muttering through one question ever 3 days in an ice cream shop. Then they kept working the "perfectly fine" narrative for a couple days after the debate meltdown. Only after it was crystal clear to them that they could no longer get 40% of Americans to buy it, they finally acknowledged that Biden's mind was shot, and the Dems needed a new candidate.
Is the job of a global media cartel really to lie about something as serious as "a US president with full-blown dementia" for a couple years, and then react to it once everyone on the planet finally knows? Aren't they the ones who are supposed to be figuring that stuff out and relaying it to idiots like you? No?
Why do you even bother watching those guys if they're only going to tell you what you had to figure out for yourself?
I know the answer, I just wanted to make you see it for yourself.
There's no "personal spin" to speak of.
They literally work together to put out a completely united front.
I understand that Fox has their own bias, but it's nowhere near as strong as the TNI bias, and it's the opposite of what TNI is saying. Eg, Fox was fully aware of the accuracy of the NYPosts's story about Hunter Biden, and made that clear in real time. Tht's the exact opposite of what TNI would have had them do.
No one reading this thread sees you as a person who just "destroyed someone" lol.^ ^ ^
Insults like "birdbrain"?
Another MAGAT loser, destroyed.
My work here is done.
You cited 5 or 6 orgs as "valued and trusted news outlets of the highest integrity" and I proved to you that they actually all conspire together to consolidate their narratives - which usually end up being 100% wrong - and to block verified information from reaching the public.
The simple fact of the matter is that TNI were 100% wrong about the Biden laptop and the BSL4 lab leak theory, but they actively engaged in pushing a false narrative and actively attacking the truth and free speech.
You do not have 5 "news" sources, owl. You get all of your "facts" from one dishonest cabal.
Into the Night
Contributor
Illiteracy: 'Magat' is not a word, Owl.
You can't blame Democrat propaganda on anybody else, Owl.