Focus groups- Trump helped himself in final debate

[archives]

Indeed.

I see “earl” is still swallowing the Rudi conspiracies, look around “earl,” it ain’t selling outside the Fox bubble, last night few had any idea what the hell Trump was talking about, and Biden nailed it when he said you can go to his income tax returns to see where his income comes from, leading Trump to regurgitate his infamous line everyone laughs at that he will release his taxes when the audit is over

But keep believing, it is entertaining and then the rest of us don’t have to listen to Fox nor the radio to get updates

 

[anatta]

Has a Democrat ever won one of Frank Lutz’s focus groups?

Neither candidate won, you could cherry pick from either to attack or defend the guy you like, which is exactly what both sides will do to spin the results

Trump did help himself, he countered the lasting image he left from the last debate, while Biden must maintained, Donny will probably get a small bump in the polls, but the Sixty Minutes interview is yet to be seen

yes they have.. If you use "cherry pick" one more time in my threads, I swear to Great Buddha I will ban you.
It's a FOCUS GROUP and these are the results

 

[Bigdog]

^Like we’ve been saying for four years lol.

If Trump would just stay out of his own way. It’s exactly that easy but it’s not. The frustrating thing is he’s entirely capable of pulling off ‘presidential’.

Which, gives the lie to the Trump caricature [pathologic personality; utterly incapable of controlling himself yada yada yada].

THAT is Trump’s biggest obstacle. Not Biden, the Democrats or their media lap dogs.

Trump’s biggest obstacle—is Trump.

I've always disagreed with that narrative. Trump simply tends to mirror those he engages with.

BTW, the Queen of England is fond of Trump.

 

[Phantasmal]

"Frank Luntz declares final debate a 'tie' — that bodes well for Biden"

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.wa...ate-a-tie-that-bodes-well-for-biden?_amp=true

I am utterly amazed they call it a tie when Trump lied over 50 times. It astonishes me they give Trump credit for lying just because he showed up and didn’t act like a lunatic.

 

[Phantasmal]

I see “earl” is still swallowing the Rudi conspiracies, look around “earl,” it ain’t selling outside the Fox bubble, last night few had any idea what the hell Trump was talking about, and Biden nailed it when he said you can go to his income tax returns to see where his income comes from, leading Trump to regurgitate his infamous line everyone laughs at that he will release his taxes when the audit is over

But keep believing, it is entertaining and then the rest of us don’t have to listen to Fox nor the radio to get updates

I got a big kick out of him saying he prepaid his taxes

 

[anatta]

"Frank Luntz declares final debate a 'tie' — that bodes well for Biden"

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.wa...ate-a-tie-that-bodes-well-for-biden?_amp=true

Trump needed to change his image he did. Biden was incoherent on his policies -especially energy.

Trying to call a win of loss is a rorschach test

 

[archives]

yes they have.. If you use "cherry pick" one more time in my threads, I swear to Great Buddha I will ban you.
It's a FOCUS GROUP and these are the results

Well if they have it was far and few between, and how was I wrong, both sides will cherry pick from a ninety minute debate to attempt to show that their side won, Biden supporters will emphasize their guy’s bright moments and ignore his worse, as will Trump backers, can’t deny that reality

 

[Bigdog]

Has a Democrat ever won one of Frank Lutz’s focus groups?

Neither candidate won, you could cherry pick from either to attack or defend the guy you like, which is exactly what both sides will do to spin the results

Trump did help himself, he countered the lasting image he left from the last debate, while Biden must maintained, Donny will probably get a small bump in the polls, but the Sixty Minutes interview is yet to be seen

Yes, Luntz is a democrat.

Biden blatantly lied to us about fracking. We've all seen the videos.

 

[anatta]

I got a big kick out of him saying he prepaid his taxes

it's very possible to do it

 

[Cypress]

I am utterly amazed they call it a tie when Trump lied over 50 times. It astonishes me they give Trump credit for lying just because he showed up and didn’t act like a lunatic.

The bar is set so low for Trump, that as long as he does not light a bag of gerbils on fire" pundits are going to attempt to give him some credit

 

[Cypress]

Trump needed to change his image he did. Biden was incoherent on his policies -especially energy.

Trying to call a win of loss is a rorschach test

Good point, Trump is also claiming there is going to be a massive red wave

 

[anatta]

Well if they have it was far and few between, and how was I wrong, both sides will cherry pick from a ninety minute debate to attempt to show that their side won, Biden supporters will emphasize their guy’s bright moments and ignore his worse, as will Trump backers, can’t deny that reality

those are snippets. cherry picking refers to data..
You aren't completely wrong in the context you use it, its the CONSTANT REFRAIN of yours that is annoying

 

[archives]

Yes, Luntz is a democrat.

Biden blatantly lied to us about fracking. We've all seen the videos.

Luntz is a Fox stable, probably changed his registration when he took the job so he could claim he was objective for Fox so regulars as yourself
would swallow the disguise

 

[anatta]

Good point, Trump is also claiming there is going to be a massive red wave

of course. Politicians don't ever say the other guy is gonna win

 

[anatta]

Luntz is a Fox stable, probably changed his registration when he took the job so he could claim he was objective for Fox so regulars as yourself would swallow the disguise

the groups use self reporting of whom they support or are undecided.
The focus groups are legit.. They are used to gauge the reactions by various types of voters

 

[Bigdog]

Luntz is a Fox stable, probably changed his registration when he took the job so he could claim he was objective for Fox so regulars as yourself
would swallow the disguise

Biden blatantly lied to us about fracking. We've all seen the videos.

 

[archives]

those are snippets. cherry picking refers to data..
You aren't completely wrong in the context you use it, its the CONSTANT REFRAIN of yours that is annoying

And deciding upon what “snippet” to employ from over ninety minutes of “snippets” is cherry picking, pick what you want and leave the other, cherry-picking is a verb, an act of selecting some while ignoring the other

 

[Earl]

I see “earl” is still swallowing the Rudi conspiracies, look around “earl,” it ain’t selling outside the Fox bubble, last night few had any idea what the hell Trump was talking about, and Biden nailed it when he said you can go to his income tax returns to see where his income comes from, leading Trump to regurgitate his infamous line everyone laughs at that he will release his taxes when the audit is over

But keep believing, it is entertaining and then the rest of us don’t have to listen to Fox nor the radio to get updates

Do you really really believe that income from illegal influence peddling would show up on Biden’s tax return?

Really?

This Biden influence peddling scandal is relatively new but Mr, Bobulinski is a whistleblower and he is meeting with the Homeland Security

Agency and the Senate staffers.

The Boss, Beijing, Burisma Buyden (sic) scandal is not going away, anchovies, as much as you would like for it to.

 

[Earl]

Biden blatantly lied to us about fracking. We've all seen the videos.

For fracking one day and against later.

When did he lie, the first or the second time?

 

[Stretch]

For the last 4 years most people like Trump and understand that his background is executive business. Most people are middle class workers. We get it.
Rather than looking for a smooth and sometimes double talking, sound bite equipped politician who recycles the same word salads and "promises" every 4 years,
we appreciate Trump's actions and follow through. Hence, "promises made, promises kept."

IMO, there are just some other folks who have gotten into the habit (easy to do, I'm not condemning them) of expecting that more polished facade of how a
textbook politician should speak. We expect them to be a type of comfort food outwardly. This is not realistic. I'm glad that he doesn't fade into the swampy
background and try to blend in with the swamp critters.

Yup. Four years have passed. Maybe more folks finally "get it." We'll take actions over words any day.