Good Mom with a gun.

Can't cut off support for children that aren't yours to support.

Well, your taxes (if you even pay taxes) go to fund assistance for children.

So you say you're opposed to assistance programs for children that you want to force women to give birth to.

And I'm the one rationalizing?


If they don't want kids, don't do what it takes to have them or accept the responsibility of having taken the action that did.

So you just don't want people to have sex because you're not having sex, huh? That's what this is all about. You can't stand that people can have casual sex, and you view sex as something dirty and should be done for procreation only. That's weird.


ell those bitches that have children they can't afford to stop demanding someone else support the little shits they chose to have. In other words, if I didn't get the pussy it came out of, it isn't my responsibility to feed it. If she can't, it's on her if it goes without.

Sounds to me like you want to outlaw casual sex.
 
If I give you permission to try and you can do it, it's not stealing. Just another excuse proving you're not a man.

If I was going to do it, I'd just wait for you to leave your house. Then I'd break in and take them without you being there. You know, like what 190,000 criminals do every year.


You can't beat your own ass.

Sounds like someone's auditioning to be Trump's next Press Secretary!


Go suck more Obama nigger dick, n-lover.

Your true colors shine through. Fuck you, Nazi pussy.
 
If I give you permission to try and take them from me, it's not lawbreaking. If you break in and steal them, you are a lawbreaker.

Right, and I'm not a lawbreaker...so this challenge of yours is just a bullshit way for you to avoid arguing on behalf of your beliefs. That's why I think it'd be so easy to get you to sell out.
 
Permission granted to try. The law has nothing to do with it.

The law has everything to do with it.

I am not a lawbreaker. But if I was, I'd just wait for you to leave, then I'd break in when you're gone and steal your guns. You have no defense for that.
 
Not what you seem to think it does. I'm still waiting on the specific powers you say they have. What you posted doesn't say what you claim it does.I didn't think a stupid nigger like POS like you would understand.

So I quote the Constitution, you don't understand what's written, so you feign being obtuse.

And then you toss out your racism for everyone to see.

It took me less than a day to get you to show your true, Nazi, racist colors.

Just think what I could accomplish if I dedicated all my time to you!
 
Back in the 1700's, there was no standing army, no real law enforcement agencies, and the threats of hostile native Americans and bears were a very real thing. But it's not the 1700's anymore. We have first responders now. Bears are mostly found in zoos. The founding fathers never anticipated such a thing. They also never anticipated a weapon that could fire thousands of rounds in a minute.

Whether you want to accept it or not, we live in a centralized economy. We live in a globalized world. Borders, which are artificial constructs, are breaking down thanks to technology.

So the world of 1770 bears no resemblance to the world of 2018.

all you're showing me at this point is that you're a moron with no real concept of history or the founding fathers intent
 
all you're showing me at this point is that you're a moron with no real concept of history or the founding fathers intent

You're so arrogant that you presume to know what the founders were thinking, based on what you've gleaned from bullshit modern sources and opinions.

Fuck outta here.
 
You're so arrogant that you presume to know what the founders were thinking, based on what you've gleaned from bullshit modern sources and opinions.

Fuck outta here.

oh bullshit. all one needs to do is read the federalist and anti federalist papers, the constitutional debate minutes, the commentaries delivered to those that voted on ratification to know exactly what the founders meant. they were extremely clear on the matters at hand. the other bullshit you have about issues that affect other people vs. issues that affect nobody........should pornography be prohibited then?
 
oh bullshit. all one needs to do is read the federalist and anti federalist papers

Which you've never done. Admit it. The federalist papers were written because the ideas expressed in them didn't make it to the actual Constitution. The FF couldn't agree on them, which is why the Federalist Papers are not the Constitution, and why many of them were written anonymously or had pseudonyms.


the constitutional debate minutes, the commentaries delivered to those that voted on ratification to know exactly what the founders meant. they were extremely clear on the matters at hand. the other bullshit you have about issues that affect other people vs. issues that affect nobody........should pornography be prohibited then?

Yeah, no, because you're referencing modern and biased interpretations of those things. You've never actually read them yourself; you've just read what other people wrote about them after they read them, right? Don't lie to me. I can tell when you're lying.
 
the commentaries delivered to those that voted on ratification to know exactly what the founders meant.

LOL! Commentaries, as you said. Which is another word for "opinion". And you never read those things. Instead what you did, because you're lazy as fuck, is that you went to the Cliffs Notes instead; you rely on warped right-wing bullshit "analysis" of opinions uttered 240 years ago, and you try to pass that off as your own wisdom. We both know you have never read those things, let alone the Constitution, yet here you are bullshitting about both anyway. That's because you're not really much of a deep thinker, but you are desperate for people to think you are.

If the Federalist papers were the intent of the FF, then they would be the Constitution. But they're not. So...::shrugs::...looks like you're shit outta luck.
 
No, I'm saying you're weak. Which is true; you're a weakling.
No, you're saying that you are weak. You are weak because there's no way in hell a pussy like you gets to call anyone else, weak. You're a fucking mangina, for Christ's sake lol.

Now get your ass back to the caves. ;)
 
Last edited:
You're damn right I'm coming for your guns because you're too irresponsible and careless to have them. Government's got nothing to do with it, and in the 240+ year history of this country, not once have guns in the hands of citizens ever been a bulwark against tyranny. Quite the opposite, actually. Our Constitution gives the government express power to violently and brutally squash any armed insurrection; a power that it's used dozens of times from Shays Rebellion to Ruby Ridge.

You're not coming for anything, bitch.

:facepalm:
 
I'm giving you permission to try. The law has nothing to do with it.

If you're so certain, step up, boy.

You can't take them. That's a certainty.

You need to realize that you're attempting to have a conversation with someone who named themselves "Derp".
That alone should have been your first clue.
 
You're so arrogant that you presume to know what the founders were thinking, based on what you've gleaned from bullshit modern sources and opinions.

Fuck outta here.
Only America hating manginas like me get to interpret the Constitution.

-- La Derp
 
You need to realize that you're attempting to have a conversation with someone who named themselves "Derp".
That alone should have been your first clue.

I don't consider it a conversation. That would involve two people having a clue and he doesn't come close.
 
Back
Top