'Hell, yes, we're going to take your AR-15, your AK-47' - Beto "Whitey" O'rourke

[Into the Night]

Do you really think our military will shoot American citizens? Shoot their own family members who own guns?

The military so far hasn't, but the BATF has.

 

[Into the Night]

They were armed to the teeth. They’re all dead.

So were the government agents. They aren't dead.

It has happened in reverse you know.

 

[Into the Night]

Those were liberals. Who cares.

Those were liberals who were attacking. Who cares.

 

[Into the Night]

Didn’t like the truthful answer, did you bitch?

Let’s have more Wacos and Ruby Ridges and thin you ignorant cocksuckers out. Let’s start with your end of the country, pussyfart.

Where is that? Buttfuckville, USA?

You really want to start a war, don't you?

 

[archives]

WRONG. Changing the Constitution is not interpreting it. It is CHANGING it. The Supreme Court does not have authority to change the Constitution. Neither to they have the authority to interpret it. See Article III of the Constitution of the United States.

No one said they were changing it, rather, they interpret what it means, did you actually think the Constitution was meant to stand just as it was written back in the 18th Century?

The Court determines what is constitutional and unconstitutional, and they have ruled guns can be regulated

 

[OG Yurt]

WRONG. Changing the Constitution is not interpreting it. It is CHANGING it. The Supreme Court does not have authority to change the Constitution. Neither to they have the authority to interpret it. See Article III of the Constitution of the United States.

Then overturn Marbury v Madison....

 

[Into the Night]

Right here, ignorant liar.


The late justice also more generally offered the belief that "like most rights, the right secured by the Second Amendment is not unlimited." It is "not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose."

Additionally, Justice Scalia strongly suggested that his reading of the Second Amendment would still allow laws prohibiting felons from owning guns, prohibiting the carrying of firearms near schools and government buildings, and ”laws imposing conditions and qualifications on the commercial sale of arms.”

The only issue Heller ruled on was that you could have a loaded handgun in your home for self protection and that it is an individual right.

SCOTUS also upheld (not Heller) a ban on assault weapons in Connecticut after Sandy Hook.

Comprende dumbfuck?

Quotes from Heller. Checkmate

Neither Scalia nor the Supreme Court has the authority to change the Constitution.

 

[OG Yurt]

No one said they were changing it, rather, they interpret what it means, did you actually think the Constitution was meant to stand just as it was written back in the 18th Century?

The Court determines what is constitutional and unconstitutional, and they have ruled guns can be regulated

To argue the flip side, cite that authority given to the Court from the Constitution. You can't because it doesn't exist.

 

[Into the Night]

Those are quotes DIRECTLY from the Heller decision, idiot.

Try to get some education, cuntwhistle

Scalia does not have the authority to change the Constitution.

 

[OG Yurt]

Neither Scalia nor the Supreme Court has the authority to change the Constitution.

You're talking about.... shall not be infringed?

 

[Into the Night]

Banning is as extreme as it gets, stoner. And it’s constitutional.

God, what a fucking stupid person.

No, it's not constitutional, dumbass.

 

[Into the Night]

The government came “to get you”?

The radical group was building its own explosives

I build my own explosives. I am a pyrotechnician as well, you see.

 

[Into the Night]

No one said they were changing it, rather, they interpret what it means,

Lie. Changing the Constitution is changing the Constitution. You can't couch it in lies.

did you actually think the Constitution was meant to stand just as it was written back in the 18th Century?

For what has not been amended, yes.

The Court determines what is constitutional and unconstitutional,

WRONG. The Court does not have authority to change the Constitution by line item veto!

and they have ruled guns can be regulated

The Court does not have authority to change the Constitution.

 

[Into the Night]

Then overturn Marbury v Madison....

No need. The court does not have authority to change the Constitution. Any attempt for them to do so has no legal force.

 

[Into the Night]

To argue the flip side, cite that authority given to the Court from the Constitution. You can't because it doesn't exist.

Article III.

 

[archives]

Lie. Changing the Constitution is changing the Constitution. You can't couch it in lies.

For what has not been amended, yes.

WRONG. The Court does not have authority to change the Constitution by line item veto!

The Court does not have authority to change the Constitution.

Again, they are not changing the Constitution, don't know why you keep repeating that lie, rather interpreting it, they are not changing anything

And to make it even more relevant, show us verbatim where in the Second Amendment, the actual words, that anyone in America can own any kind of weapon they want without any restrictions.

Even the gun manufacturers advertising you are regurgitating is their interpretation on what the Amendmemt says, fortunately the definative interpretation is that of the Supreme Court, and they have ruled guns can be regulated

 

[nolongertolerant]

Those were liberals who were attacking. Who cares.

??

 

[Rusty Bell 65]

The military so far hasn't, but the BATF has.

Yes, another gov't agency that should be abolished, they have too much power.

 

[Into the Night]

Again, they are not changing the Constitution, don't know why you keep repeating that lie, rather interpreting it, they are not changing anything

You are arguing a change in the Constitution by the Supreme Court. They do not have that authority.

And to make it even more relevant, show us verbatim where in the Second Amendment, the actual words, that anyone in America can own any kind of weapon they want without any restrictions.

There is no clause that specifies a weapon by type of brand. Nothing in Article I specifies a weapon by type or brand either.

Even the gun manufacturers advertising you are regurgitating is their interpretation on what the Amendmemt says, fortunately the definative interpretation is that of the Supreme Court, and they have ruled guns can be regulated

The Supreme Court does not have authority to change the constitution.

 

[Into the Night]

??

It wasn't just liberals being shot. It was liberals that were attacking the national guard troops that were being shot. Good riddance.