Hiroshima, 6 August 1945

Yet the American ppl were told that Hiroshima and Nagasaki were necessary targets.

My dad was a scientist; he worked on one of the many small parts of the Manhattan Project. He believed that narrative at the time, too. But as the decades rolled on and more information came out, he changed his mind. He felt tremendous guilt over his role as a civilian scientist. No doubt many others did as well.

Even Oppenheimer was conflicted.
 
I have no problem fighting for what I believe in. I believe you are another one of the Deadbeats that turned your back on the Syrian women and children being gassed by Assad. When Obama wanted to make a surgical strike on Assad for violating the International Chemical Weapons ban, you and your Republican friends were all against it. 'Doormat'. When I use that word, I think of you.
OMG

U.S. Airstrikes Destroyed a Busy Afghanistan Trauma Hospital
https://www.wsj.com/articles/u-s-ai...l-six-years-later-it-is-reopening-11628251200
 
Each time I see the title I keep wondering... How is this a current event? But, meh... I'll leave it be.
 
I embrace the teachings of Jesus, do no harm, turn the other cheek, etc., but I do not practice any religion.

So. When the Twin Towers were knocked down and 3,000 Americans killed, you (like your Deadbeat sister) advocated for 'turning the other cheek'?
 
Even Oppenheimer was conflicted.
hindsight is 20/20

This is why I hate historical revisionism; same thing as Critical Race Theory
you can't judge event of the past from todays perspective

Im sure there is lot of angst. But it took 2 A- BOMBS to end the war. that should tell you something
 
Ummmmm...it takes two to make peace and only one to make war.

What was FDR supposed to do after Pearl Harbor, in your opinion?

c9c388_c0c0558f565d4e6685ac1c8f216ce768~mv2.gif

I understand defending ourselves. I still don’t support war. I will never view the nuking of Japan as necessary.
 
:) It's a Politics Forum, we're all here to voice our opinions. You support Deadbeats and being a Doormat. I support defending America and Western Values. (like NOT gassing women and children with Internationally Banned Chemical Weapons)

Nah, you just support your supposed right to write filth about the women here, annoy the males who think you're a chihuahua, and your right to provoke flame wars because that's the only way you know you're still alive. Now waddle on back to the angry, hangry spider's web with the rest of your gossip girl clique and let the adults talk, pumpkin. :rofl2:
 
Nah, you just support your supposed right to write filth about the women here, annoy the males who think you're a chihuahua, and your right to provoke flame wars because that's the only way you know you're still alive. Now waddle on back to the angry, hangry spider's web with the rest of your gossip girl clique and let the adults talk, pumpkin. :rofl2:


:laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh:

Translation: 'OK. I'm a Deadbeat. What can I say?'.
 
Each time I see the title I keep wondering... How is this a current event? But, meh... I'll leave it be.

Today is the 76th anniversary of the day we dropped the first atomic weapon on Hiroshima. The debate over was it justified or not continues, and thus is current. Your take?
 
There is absolutely no question that the two A-Bombs were necessary to stop the War and the killing.

And while in a general moralistic perspective, it saved Japanese lives, the MAIN thing was to stop the loss of American lives.

A million deaths were predicted if the US had to carry out their planned invasion of Japan.

The A-Bombs saved at least a million lives.

Period.

End of the argument.

"...the rationale for the atomic bombings has come to rest on a single colossal fabrication, which has gained surprising currency — that they were necessary in order to save a half-million or more American lives. These, supposedly, are the lives that would have been lost in the planned invasion of Kyushu in December, then in the all-out invasion of Honshu the next year, if that had been needed. But the worst-case scenario for a full-scale invasion of the Japanese home islands was forty-six thousand American lives lost.7

The ridiculously inflated figure of a half-million for the potential death toll — nearly twice the total of US dead in all theaters in the Second World War — is now routinely repeated in high-school and college textbooks and bandied about by ignorant commentators. Unsurprisingly the prize for sheer fatuousness on this score goes to President George H.W. Bush, who claimed in 1991 that dropping the bomb "spared millions of American lives."8

[url]https://mises.org/library/harry-truman-and-atomic-bomb

[/URL]
 
LOL! You won't defend yourself against me. You said you'd run to the cops. Fucking degenerate coward.

If you weren't a fucking moron you'd back up that lie with a cited quote. That said, if it makes you feel like a "real man" typing it, then go for it.
 
Back
Top