https://www.metroweekly.com/2018/07...gainst-state-gops-anti-gay-marriage-platform/
When it comes to policies that are designed to discriminate against gays -- whether its policies that allow gays to be discriminated against in housing, employment, etc -- the Republican party seems to be the main party pushing those policies.
So when a Republican in a state as red as Idaho came out in support of gay marriage -- it makes one wonder, is that stance a true conservative stance or is it anti-conservative? Dom Gelsomino is an openly gay, devout Christian who is running for the state legislature and he believes that while Democrats are more guilty of expanding government beyond its constitutional limits, the GOP has committed the same error when it comes to same-sex marriage. Another Idaho republican also supported gay marriage by saying "We as Republicans are and need to remain the party of inclusion, less intrusive government means government has no business in licensing families."
So I guess the question remains -- can you be a strong conservative and support gay marriage?
Can you be a strong conservative and support gay marriage?
The federal gov't should not be involved in the marriage biz.
why two men can not be married?
that's a serious question?
that's just silly, think how silly that is
They aren't. The feds didn't require gay marriage, the Constitution's equal protection clause prohibits states from discriminating against gays without a compelling reason (according to court interpretation).
That's IT? "Just think how silly that is?"
C'mon. That's impossibly weak. Try to articulate your position, or don't say anything.
She's been repeating that bleat for a while now...and apparently thinks that repeating it makes it sound less like a bleat.
It doesn't.
It is just her way of pretending her hateful prejudices are less than hateful prejudices.
you falling in line with changing a centuries old definition of an institution because an oxford publication decided to "re-define", and I'm the one spreading bleat?
ha
two men can not "marry" each other, that's just silly
https://www.metroweekly.com/2018/07...gainst-state-gops-anti-gay-marriage-platform/
When it comes to policies that are designed to discriminate against gays -- whether its policies that allow gays to be discriminated against in housing, employment, etc -- the Republican party seems to be the main party pushing those policies.
So when a Republican in a state as red as Idaho came out in support of gay marriage -- it makes one wonder, is that stance a true conservative stance or is it anti-conservative? Dom Gelsomino is an openly gay, devout Christian who is running for the state legislature and he believes that while Democrats are more guilty of expanding government beyond its constitutional limits, the GOP has committed the same error when it comes to same-sex marriage. Another Idaho republican also supported gay marriage by saying "We as Republicans are and need to remain the party of inclusion, less intrusive government means government has no business in licensing families."
So I guess the question remains -- can you be a strong conservative and support gay marriage?
it is a serious question. marriage is nothing more than a contract between two people, right? so why can't two men or two women marry?
Better question is why anyone would want to be a "strong conservative."
It's a mental defect
Responding to bold: wrong.
by all means, please provide a definition of marriage....and not a biased one, but the most basic of definitions...i.e. a union etc.
Why do you choose to be a nl?
you falling in line with changing a centuries old definition of an institution because an oxford publication decided to "re-define", and I'm the one spreading bleat?
ha
two men can not "marry" each other, that's just silly
It depends on the religion. The meaning that you exposed is from the liberal religion.
so marriage is a religious ONLY concept?