Is Global Warming A Hoax? Discover The Climate Change Facts And Fiction

What growing contingent of scientists? Dentists? It certainly isn't any scientist that actually studies climate.

The most vocal scientist, Willie Soon, has been accused of fraud for failing to reveal the funding for his research. There really is no one else out there since Fred Singer turned 90 a few years ago.
Take it to the source, you gelatinous pile of leftism, I'm just the messenger.

Now, be a good little flower child and drum up a source that blows this one out of the water. ;)
 
What growing contingent of scientists? Dentists? It certainly isn't any scientist that actually studies climate.

The most vocal scientist, Willie Soon, has been accused of fraud for failing to reveal the funding for his research. There really is no one else out there since Fred Singer turned 90 a few years ago.

Yet another ignorant bugger, where do they come from? Here are just a few scientists that do not worship at the altar of climate alarmism. There are many more and growing by the day.

Judith Curry
Nic Lewis
Richard Lindzen
Freeman Dyson
Nir Shaviv
Ivar Giaever
Fred Singer
Ian Plimer
Harrison Schmidt
Roger Pielke
Will Happer
Roy Spencer
John Christy
Jasper Kirkby
Richard Keen
Stanley Goldenburg
Frederic Seitz
Robert Jastrow
William Nierenberg
Robert Laughlin
Lennart Bengtsson
Horst-Joachim Lüdecke
Nicola Scafetta
Harald Ynderstadt
Hermann Harde
Maria da Assunção Araújo
Nils-Axel Mörner
Henrik Svensmark
Camille Veyres
Gernot Patzelt
Helmut Alt
Stefan Kröpelin
Michael Schnell
Friedrich-Karl Ewert
Günter Ederer
Michael Limburg
Joanne Nova
Peter Evans
Peter Ridd
James Taylor
Susan Crockford
Thomas Wysmuller
Henri Masson
Wolfgang Müller
Holger Thuss
Bjørn Lomborg
 
Last edited:
While many people in the media and scientific community claim the climate change science is settled, do the facts back that up? Derisively called "deniers," climate change skeptics continue to challenge the so-called conventional wisdom, asking "Is global warming a hoax? Is man-made global warming the dire threat environmentalists claim?"

Recent global warming agreements brokered by the U.N. seek steep reductions in world C02 output to slow the presumed warming of the earth's atmosphere, while also seeking alterations in the economy that would move energy sources away from fossil fuels toward renewable natural energy.

But a growing contingent of scientists and economists call into question the climate change dogma, saying that the temperature data show no clear recent warming and noting that the benefits of global warming, if it existed, might be greater than the costs. This split will define the political debate in the near term.

https://www.investors.com/politics/global-warming-hoax-climate-change-facts/




The sky is freezing the sky is FREEZING!!!!

-- The Left

Don't the flat-earthers go on - and on and on and on and on! Why, I wonder. I hope someone's paying for these ludicrous essays of theirs.
 
Yet another ignorant bugger, where do they come from? Here are just a few scientists that do not worship at the altar of climate alarmism. There are many more and growing by the day.

Judith Curry
Nic Lewis
Richard Lindzen
Freeman Dyson
Nir Shaviv
Ivar Giaever
Fred Singer
Ian Plimer
Harrison Schmidt
Roger Pielke
Will Happer
Roy Spencer
John Christy
Jasper Kirkby
Richard Keen
Stanley Goldenburg

Lennart Bengtsson
Horst-Joachim Lüdecke
Nicola Scafetta
Harald Ynderstadt
Hermann Harde
Maria da Assunção Araújo
Nils-Axel Mörner
Henrik Svensmark
Camille Veyres
Gernot Patzelt
Helmut Alt
Stefan Kröpelin
Michael Schnell
Friedrich-Karl Ewert
Günter Ederer
Michael Limburg
Joanne Nova
Peter Evans
Peter Ridd
James Taylor
Susan Crockford
Thomas Wysmuller
Henri Masson
Wolfgang Müller
Holger Thuss
Bjørn Lomborg

"fogcatcher" just continues to prove the point, he offers forty something individuals, which often turn out to be anything but scientists, even had a weatherman one time, as a counterbalance to the thousands of studies completed by actual climate scientists supporting man made climate change.

As I've said it is the false equivalence "deniers" employ continuously attempting to muddle the facts

(again, now it is time for the personal attacks, "cunt" is his latest import)
 
Why? Because a bunch of ball sucking invertebrates are screaming about the ozone? lol.

15 years after the day after tomorrow, and counting... ;)

No, you fucking flat earther. Because a bunch of scientists are actually watching it.

But, then again, science is something foreign to Bible thumpers. :rofl2:
 
Take it to the source, you gelatinous pile of leftism, I'm just the messenger.

Now, be a good little flower child and drum up a source that blows this one out of the water. ;)

An opinion piece is your source for science?

If you want to see that warming HAS occurred unlike your source claims, go here:
https://climate.nasa.gov/vital-signs/global-temperature/

Your "source" is written by an ignoramus who is totally ignorant of the current science.
 
The overwhelming percentage of scientists are not only believers but alarmed at what the evidence shows. You can buy a scientist when you have the money and power of the deniers. The fossil fuel industry has a bottomless pit of cash to buy off scientists.
But, if it is true, as the vast majority of scientists say, then we better get at it. It can save the globe. If they are wrong, we have cleaned the air, land and water. Which to me is a great achievement. The only mistake is doing nothing and risking it all for short term profits.
 
Yet another ignorant bugger, where do they come from? Here are just a few scientists that do not worship at the altar of climate alarmism. There are many more and growing by the day.

Judith Curry
Nic Lewis
Richard Lindzen
Freeman Dyson
Nir Shaviv
Ivar Giaever
Fred Singer
Ian Plimer
Harrison Schmidt
Roger Pielke
Will Happer
Roy Spencer
John Christy
Jasper Kirkby
Richard Keen
Stanley Goldenburg
Frederic Seitz
Robert Jastrow
William Nierenberg
Robert Laughlin
Lennart Bengtsson
Horst-Joachim Lüdecke
Nicola Scafetta
Harald Ynderstadt
Hermann Harde
Maria da Assunção Araújo
Nils-Axel Mörner
Henrik Svensmark
Camille Veyres
Gernot Patzelt
Helmut Alt
Stefan Kröpelin
Michael Schnell
Friedrich-Karl Ewert
Günter Ederer
Michael Limburg
Joanne Nova
Peter Evans
Peter Ridd
James Taylor
Susan Crockford
Thomas Wysmuller
Henri Masson
Wolfgang Müller
Holger Thuss
Bjørn Lomborg

I do have to laugh at your list..

This about Lindzen...
The November 10, 2004 online version of Reason magazine reported that Lindzen is "willing to take bets that global average temperatures in 20 years will in fact be lower than they are now".[76] However, on June 8, 2005 they reported that Lindzen insisted that he had been misquoted, after James Annan contacted Lindzen to make the bet but claimed that "Lindzen would take only 50 to 1 odds".[77]

Such a skeptic that he would only take 50-1 odds in 2004 that the temperature would be lower. He would have lost unless we suddenly have 10 major volcanoes erupt in 2022.

Herman Harde's lack of credentials can be found here:
http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2018/04/harde-times/

Henrik Svensmark in March of 2018 said this -
“I believe there's no doubt that CO2 is a greenhouse gas. […] So there's no doubt that CO2 is also affecting climate"
 
4 Climate scientists?

Geez. I hope you don't tell Congress they are Climate Scientists or you would be guilty of perjury.

Richard Keen - Meteorologist
Stanley B Goldenberg - Meteorologist
Jay H Lehr - A PHD in Ground Water Hydrology and Geology.
 
Is global warming a hoax?

The best advertisement for the utter stupidity and willful ignorance of the climate denier corps are posts like this.


Next up: There is an vast, international conspiracy of climate scientists who are faking the data to perpetrate the global warming hoax!
 
Back
Top