Executive branch can be sued by parties in court and held to account in the judicial branch if they do not fulfill their obligations under administrative lawThat land falls under the authority of which branch of government, cupcake?![]()
Executive branch can be sued by parties in court and held to account in the judicial branch if they do not fulfill their obligations under administrative lawThat land falls under the authority of which branch of government, cupcake?![]()
Heh. I handle bombs regularly. I like lighting fuses!Just one more thing to make liberal's heads explode.
Absolutely.If Obama did it, libturds would be on their knees singing praises and Kumbaya.
You can sue if you don't like the shape of someone's nose on their face.Executive branch can be sued by parties in court and held to account in the judicial branch if they do not fulfill their obligations under administrative law
If the contract was won then why does NPS have no idea the amount of the contract? At this point you are just making shit up.Utterly nothing suggests that.
No doubt they won the contract months ago and were called Friday evening to start work the next day.
You don't have to take my word. You could go look at the testimony in court on the 12th.I'd take your word for the lack of Cost Breakdown, but to do so would be foolish.
Yet you can't point to a single thing I said that was not true. You only claim it MIGHT have been something else.You post what you think will tarnish the enemy of your party, not what is true or accurate.'
That's funny. So you are saying the pictures of heavy equipment removing trees is a figment of my imagination?You are creating a scenario that is not supported by fact or evidence.
You are painting a picture you believe supports your claims - that is based on nothing more than your desire to attack the enemy of your party.
What facts are known? Clearly you are ignorant of the testimony in court on Monday.And?
Again, you are building a straw man that has no relation to the facts that are known.
Just so you know, all that speculation by you and @T. A. Gardner about how this was work being done by contractors may just be fantasy on your part. If the testimony is accurate, the work is being done by National Park Service employees.Utterly nothing suggests that.
No doubt they won the contract months ago and were called Friday evening to start work the next day.
Why do you hate the US Constitution? The Constitution gives the courts the power over any time the government is sued.You can sue if you don't like the shape of someone's nose on their face.
Big hairy deal.
You cannot sue a branch of government.
I really don't care who is doing the work. My point was, and is, this judge overstepped her authority in micromanaging this project.Just so you know, all that speculation by you and @T. A. Gardner about how this was work being done by contractors may just be fantasy on your part. If the testimony is accurate, the work is being done by National Park Service employees.
View: https://x.com/MacFarlaneNews/status/2109652261030723856
Now look up what The National Park Service is.If the contract was won then why does NPS have no idea the amount of the contract? At this point you are just making shit up.
You don't have to take my word. You could go look at the testimony in court on the 12th.
Yet you can't point to a single thing I said that was not true. You only claim it MIGHT have been something else.
That's funny. So you are saying the pictures of heavy equipment removing trees is a figment of my imagination?
What facts are known? Clearly you are ignorant of the testimony in court on Monday.
The National Park Service supervisor and the Deputy Director of the National Park service who authorized the work have no idea what the cost is.
View: https://x.com/MacFarlaneNews/status/2109664203963506972
View: https://x.com/MacFarlaneNews/status/2109691268871672020
Just so you know, all that speculation by you and @T. A. Gardner about how this was work being done by contractors may just be fantasy on your part. If the testimony is accurate, the work is being done by National Park Service employees.
View: https://x.com/MacFarlaneNews/status/2109652261030723856
Did she go to the golf course and point to which trees couldn't be cut down?I really don't care who is doing the work. My point was, and is, this judge overstepped her authority in micromanaging this project.
You might want to reread that and look up words you don't seem to understand, such as managing and conserving. It doesn't mean destroying and tearing down.Now look up what The National Park Service is.
I'll help ya out here.
"The U.S. Department of the Interior (DOI) is an essential part of the executive branch of the U.S. government, responsible for managing and conserving the nation’s natural resources and cultural heritage. Established on March 3, 1849, the DOI emerged to address various domestic duties as federal responsibilities expanded. Today, it oversees significant land and resource management activities through its nine major bureaus, including the Bureau of Land Management, which manages vast federal lands, and the National Park Service, responsible for maintaining numerous national parks and historical sites."
![]()
U.S. Department of the Interior (DOI) | Science | Research Starters | EBSCOhost
<p>The U.S. Department of the Interior (DOI) is an essential part of the executive branch of the U.S. government, responsible for managing and conserving the nation’s natural resources and cultural heritage. Established on March 3, 1849, the DOI emerged to address various domestic duties as...www.ebsco.com
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M5QGkOGZubQ
You're very naive, cupcake.You might want to reread that and look up words you don't seem to understand, such as managing and conserving. It doesn't mean destroying and tearing down.
Reporting on what happened in court isn't a lie. Multiple news services have reported the same thing.As expected, your "evidence" is from a sleazy leftist hate site. McFarlane has ZERO credibility, nor does the MeidasTouch hate site. McFarlane who was FIRED from CBS because he is a leftist tool who distorts and fabricates stories.
What source told you that the removal of trees was a "Cost Plus" contract?As legitimate sources have already noted, the contract is "Cost Plus" - an extremely common type of contract. McFarlane is a fraud, as are you. Both of you once again engaging in demagoguery and slander - which is literally ally you do.
You're very naive, cupcake.
Rusty each time you speak you prove you are poorly educated.Isn't it funny that libturds think anyone who disagrees with them is uneducated? Pee Pee is a prime suspect...
Great, as soon as the next Dem POTUS is in, lets implement that.yes. that's why injuntions need to be eliminated.
ya but that is a stupid point proved wrong already.I really don't care who is doing the work. My point was, and is, this judge overstepped her authority in micromanaging this project.
The Constitution is over and Trump does not give a fuck about the law.ya but that is a stupid point proved wrong already.
The judge in no way has micromanaged this project.
She got a simple agreement from the gov't in the way all courts do in such a position and the gov't violated it.