Judge Orders Trump Administration to Answer for Tree Removals at D.C. Golf Course

[Into the Night]

If the contract was won then why does NPS have no idea the amount of the contract? At this point you are just making shit up.

NPS does know the value of the contract, even if some individuals in NPS don't.

You don't have to take my word. You could go look at the testimony in court on the 12th.

Irrevelance fallacy.

Yet you can't point to a single thing I said that was not true.

Lie.

You only claim it MIGHT have been something else.

Word games won't work, liar.

That's funny. So you are saying the pictures of heavy equipment removing trees is a figment of my imagination?

Yes.

What facts are known?

The facts he stated. Go learn what 'fact' means.

Clearly you are ignorant of the testimony in court on Monday.

Irrelevance fallacy.

The National Park Service supervisor and the Deputy Director of the National Park service who authorized the work have no idea what the cost is.

...so? The NPS does know what the the cost basically is.

 

[Into the Night]

Just so you know, all that speculation by you and @T. A. Gardner about how this was work being done by contractors may just be fantasy on your part. If the testimony is accurate, the work is being done by National Park Service employees.

...and contracted workers and equipment, liar.

 

[Into the Night]

Why do you hate the US Constitution?

DON'T TRY TO HIDE BEHIND THE CONSTITUTION YOU DESPISE!

The Constitution gives the courts the power over any time the government is sued.

No, it doesn't, liar.

The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States, and Treaties made, or which shall be made, under their Authority;--to all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls;--to all Cases of admiralty and maritime Jurisdiction;--to Controversies to which the United States shall be a Party;-

That is not power over the government, liar.

 

[Matt Dillon]

I guess that makes you stupid because you don't know that people can sue the executive branch for not following the law.

Ultimately what The Executive Branch says is the law in matters such as this, fucktard.

 

[Jarod]

You know why. Soros partisanship.

Take an 8th grade government class, then you might figure it out. Check Federal Jurisdiction.

 

[Jarod]

So judges are arborists and know what trees need to be taken out now?

STFU, you fucking moron.

Derp, derp.

 

[Poor Richard Saunders]

Ultimately what The Executive Branch says is the law in matters such as this, fucktard.

No. It isn't. We have this little thing called the Constitution which gives courts the power to decide what the law is.

 

[Poor Richard Saunders]

DON'T TRY TO HIDE BEHIND THE CONSTITUTION YOU DESPISE!

No, it doesn't, liar.

That is not power over the government, liar.

Just when I think you can't get any stupider, you prove me wrong.

It seems you can't read. The power to judge all suits against the government doesn't mean power over the government. .

 

[Rusty Bell 65]

Rusty each time you speak you prove you are poorly educated.

And that is because you are incapable of understanding that it is not me who thinks that of you... it is this guy who RECOGNIZED it in you...

Here is mocking you for being a gullible easy mark...

Here he is mocking you for having no ethics or moral core...

And despite the above Rusty you will read it and NOT understand it. You will again say it is me saying it and not Trump saying it. You do not understand you are calling Trump the libturd. And that is because you are poorly educated.

I don't read your bullshit, Pee Pee. You are a stupid person.
You obviously haven't a clue what education is. your posts reflect so.
If you did, you wouldn't accuse those of us who are educated as being uneducated.
Your worthless posts reflect the ignorance you claim of others. And no, Trump wasn't talking about me.
So, in conclusion, it is YOU, libturd, who is uneducated in both life experiences and common sense.

 

[QP!]

Ultimately what The Executive Branch says is the law in matters such as this, fucktard.

Once again you prove how stupid you are when it comes to America and American law and the Constitution.

No, Obama and Biden did not get to dictate what the law is without Courts being able to check and balance them. That you are now arguing no Court should have been able to stop what they wanted to do as "Ultimately the Executive says what the law is" is you showing your stupidity moving to its max level.

 

[QP!]

I don't read your bullshit, Pee Pee. You are a stupid person.
You obviously haven't a clue what education is. your posts reflect so.
If you did, you wouldn't accuse those of us who are educated as being uneducated.
Your worthless posts reflect the ignorance you claim of others. And no, Trump wasn't talking about me.
So, in conclusion, it is YOU, libturd, who is uneducated in both life experiences and common sense.

As always Rusty you never fail to amuse us as you admit you 'do not read'. FLOL.

Over and over i prove to you it is Trump and not me, pointing out you are poorly educated but because you are poorly educated you cannot understand it so round and round we go.

Back to you Rusty. Time to show you do you understand it again.

Rusty each time you speak you prove you are poorly educated.

And that is because you are incapable of understanding that it is not me who thinks that of you... it is this guy who RECOGNIZED it in you...

Here is mocking you for being a gullible easy mark...

Here he is mocking you for having no ethics or moral core...

And despite the above Rusty you will read it and NOT understand it. You will again say it is me saying it and not Trump saying it. You do not understand you are calling Trump the libturd. And that is because you are poorly educated.

 

[Matt Dillon]

Once again you prove how stupid you are when it comes to America and American law and the Constitution.

No, Obama and Biden did not get to dictate what the law is without Courts being able to check and balance them. That you are now arguing no Court should have been able to stop what they wanted to do as "Ultimately the Executive says what the law is" is you showing your stupidity moving to its max level.

It's an Executive Bureau that serves at the pleasure of the president. The president decides what is done with Federal lands, not some circuit judge, fuck off.

 

[QP!]

It's an Executive Bureau that serves at the pleasure of the president. The president decides what is done with Federal lands, not some circuit judge, fuck off.

Ok listen here you pea brain moron.

NO. the executive and President DO
NOT own the assets of the government that are in their branch. THEY MANAGE THEM under set rules.

And they only manage them because Congress let's them and Congress can fire them from doing so by taking away that management power and giving it elsewhere.

So no, you backward ass Magat stupid hillbilly freak Trump has no power to just decide and courts are REQUIRED to settle any dispute over them when they may be breaking the law or rules of how they were set up to be managed by Congress

 

[evince]

So judges are arborists and know what trees need to be taken out now?

STFU, you fucking moron.

Under your logic here no one would be able to qualify as a judge

It’s not about trees you idiot


It’s about following the law

The judge is a law expert idiot

 

[evince]

It's an Executive Bureau that serves at the pleasure of the president. The president decides what is done with Federal lands, not some circuit judge, fuck off.

Cite the laws to prove your point

 

[Into the Night]

Just when I think you can't get any stupider, you prove me wrong.

It seems you can't read. The power to judge all suits against the government doesn't mean power over the government. .

You just said it did. Which is it, dude??
Hint: You are wrong either way.

The courts in the United States do not have the authority to judge all lawsuits against the government of the United States.

For example: North Korea could file a lawsuit in North Korea against President Trump. Does any court in the United States have jurisdiction over North Korea? It could even win. Do you think they will be able to collect damages?

No court in the United States has the authority to write law. Indeed, their ruling MUST comply with the law. If one law conflicts with another, the higher law prevails and the other is discarded for the plaintiffs and the defendants only.

The Supreme Court has the additional authority to rule a law passed by Congress unconstitutional, but that is all.

 

[Into the Night]

Ultimately what The Executive Branch says is the law in matters such as this, fucktard.

Basically correct.
The President, as Chief Executive has full authority over the executive branch. He can hire, fire, advance, demote, anyone he wants.
He has all the authority he needs to authorize the National Park Service to maintain and improve a golf course under their jurisdiction, including removing overgrown or diseased trees.

No judge has any authority to usurp the Chief Executive of his power or authority.

 

[Into the Night]

Take an 8th grade government class, then you might figure it out. Check Federal Jurisdiction.

Random phrase. No apparent coherency.

The federal government has jurisdiction over the entire United States and all of its territories, Pretender.

 

[Into the Night]

No. It isn't. We have this little thing called the Constitution which gives courts the power to decide what the law is.

DON'T TRY TO HIDE BEHIND THE CONSTITUTION YOU DESPISE!

No court has any authority to write any law.

 

[Into the Night]

Just when I think you can't get any stupider, you prove me wrong.

It seems you can't read. The power to judge all suits against the government doesn't mean power over the government. .

Yet you claim it does. Now you are just contradicting yourself.